Hey, there! Log in / Register

Abandoned downtown gas station could become city's first charging station for electric cars

NorthEndWaterfront.com reports on a developer's plans for the old Mobil station at Friend and New Chardon streets.

Neighborhoods: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

There's nothing green about an asphalt area used to charge cars.

up
Voting closed 0

if they can't do this in the middle of the Common, don't do it at all!

But seriously, I thought electric cars would be charge-able with wall outlets, which could be in parking garages? What ever happened to that idea?

up
Voting closed 0

This is to extend your range.

up
Voting closed 0

Maybe it's for people too lazy to carry their car up to their apartment to charge it

up
Voting closed 0

Is this a joke? Its a surface parking lot with a little greenwashing. 6 outlets for the 24 spaces? Can't something more productive be put in a place the article says 30,000 people pass by than 24 parking spaces?

up
Voting closed 0

It's already little gas station (abandoned, granted) on an oddly shaped parcel. Even if you could figure out how to put something on there, what? Condos? No market. Office space? Ditto. A statue? Yeah, you could do that, downtown Boston doesn't have enough of those. Or an Irish pub.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm cool with the idea but why not have an outlet per spot?

up
Voting closed 0

IMAGE(http://www.boston-online.com/graphics/donuts.gif)

up
Voting closed 0

IIRC there's already a Dunkin at Haymarket right nearby. But when has that ever stopped them.

up
Voting closed 0

Yeah, downtown doesn't have enough. Why, you have to climb all the way up the stairs from the Dunkin' Donuts in the Government Center T stop to get to another Dunkin' Donuts - and then it's, God, a 15-second walk around the corner to the next one!

But give props to the Double-D for building a Dunkin' Donuts on Rte. 9 in Wellesley diagonally across from an existing Dunkin' Donuts.

up
Voting closed 0

"unnecessary redundant Dunkin's" award goes to the TD Garden, which has one DDs adjacent to the west entrance and another one a stone's throw (or is that hockey puck) in the commuter rail waiting area.

up
Voting closed 0

And just what exactly is wrong with a wee Irish pub? urrrp.

up
Voting closed 0

I guess Ms. Gorin is not going to be putting anyhting up on that site for a while.

This station is a good idea. You have to start somewhere.

As far as it being "green", what do you want? Rip up the pavement, the fill and let it go back to being the 1600's mill pond shore? Get over it.

up
Voting closed 0

Green Park & Charge will replace the petroleum-based 20th century filling station with an environmentally-conscious 21st century electric charging station.

And that environmentally-conscious 21st century electricity? It's generated by 20th century nuclear power and natural gas.

Edit: I tell a lie.

Gas: 36.6%
Nuclear: 25.6%
Coal: 15.2%
Oil: 9.8%
Hydro: 6%
Non-hydro renewable: 5.3%

http://oaspub.epa.gov/powpro/ept_pack.charts

up
Voting closed 0

A third of energy from non-carbon emitting sources is better than nothing, and natural gas emits less carbon per unit of energy than oil, so that's an improvement too. When a car is powered by gasoline, that's 100% Oil, so you can get improvements by cranking down to less bad alternatives.

Until solar powered cars become viable, it's not really possible to run cars on something that is truly green. (And even solar isn't perfect, since you still have to manufacture the panels.) Switching to electrical cars in the short term creates a modest reduction in carbon emissions, and since you're putting energy into the car in a neutral format, it makes it easier for future improvements to be made.

up
Voting closed 0

Green is relative

Thanks for saying it.

up
Voting closed 0

Of course green is relative, who ever said that "better" would be "perfect"? Our world isn't a vacuum with balanced polar, direct and balanced relationships. Ther are alot of inputs and outputs, green is being conscious of those and finding what's best in the larger system

up
Voting closed 0

Even charging your car using electricity from a coal fired plant, which is the most polluting way to get your electricity, puts less carbon into the air than driving the same distance in a gas burner would.

up
Voting closed 0

I'M sure the neighborhood assn is happy and nothing is cheaper to create and faster to deliver ROI than parking. So what? Unless the old gas tanks are there and have caused enviro damage that Gorin or future developer would have to deal with depending on how deal is structured.

up
Voting closed 0

There are 3 levels of recharging equipment:

level 1 is 120 volts (like your house outlet) and requires around 12 hours to fully recharge the car batteries

level 2 is 240 volts (need to spend a few grand to upgrade your home service) and takes about 6 hours

level 3 requires an expensive customized site, is 480 volts and about 30 minutes to fully charge a battery.

up
Voting closed 0

If youre paying a few grand to get a 240v outlet, youre being ripped off.

Many homes already have a 240v outlet for the dryer.

up
Voting closed 0

You're right. However, I was thinking of older homes like mine that have 100A service; I'd need to upgrade the service and get a new panel and run a 240 volt line to the garage.
Thinking on this somemore...wouldn't it be an electric code violation to run the 240 car charge line into the 240 dryer line; if both were operating it would be an overload.

up
Voting closed 0