Police use Trojan-horse strategy to bust up loud frat party in Allston

The boys of Chi Phi, 16 Ashford St., know how to par-tay (scan here and here). When fed-up nearby residents began flooding 911 with calls early yesterday morning about the blarin' BU boys, the constabulary rolled into action.

But because the fraternity brother have been mean to the cops in the past - they've slammed doors in the faces of uniformed men with guns - Boston Police report they took a different approach this time: They sent in a youngish plainclothes officer first to scout out the scene:

The officer was invited into the party and inside that address observed 75-100 partygoers, many of whom were underage drinking from red plastic cups. The officers observed alcohol being freely distributed without regard to age with a “beer pong” in the basement. The officer further made note that this house was an active Boston University frat house belonging to Chi Pi. The officer also noted evidence of drug use in the house, namely a glass bong with marijuana residue in plain view.

After observing the above, the plain clothes officer opened the door for fellow officers who were able to enter and disperse the large crowd of partygoers some of who were able to flee.

Police report arresting ten lads on charges of being minors in possession of alcohol and disturbing the peace.

City records list the house as having just three bedrooms, but a value of $635,000.

Innocent, etc.

Comments

I'm not a lawyer...

...I don't even play one on T.V.

But isn't there likely to be warrent issues if/when it comes time to prosecute someone?

Not unless there's a search of the house

If you invite an undercover cop into your house, then anything in plain view is your fault. If you want the protection of your "castle", then you shouldn't lower the moat to just anyone who shows up at your doorstep. They can't search the place for further evidence (like a stash of pot in your closet or under a mattress) without a warrant after that, but they can seize anything they see you using in the commission of the crime that they're arresting you for (bong, alcohol, etc).

Double Secret Probation!

Says Dean Wormer...

Get serious

If the City of Boston, the Police, and BU were serious about this, the frat house would be shut down. Year after year it is the same thing over and over again in the Pratt & Ashford St area and those with the power to really make some changes never do.

Okay, so what do you

Okay, so what do you recommend? They've arrested the perpetrators, what next? B.U. can de-certify the fraternity I suppose, but to do that they will likely need to determine that the official fraternity apparatus was behind the legal violations, that it was supported by the national organization, etc. Is there evidence of this?

B.U. doesn't own the house, so even if they eject the fraternity, there will still be students independently living in Allston and holding parties. What legal mechanism does the university have other than after the fact punishment? Likewise, what prevention strategy should BPD employ?

Clearing banning all 16-24

Clearing banning all 16-24 year olds from stepping foot in Boston is the only solution.

how about the courts?

The maximum fine for disturbing the peace is 6 months in jail.

So after this party, you send the kids that live there to jail for 2 whole days. Then tell them the next time they will go to jail for 2 whole weeks, and then 2 whole months the time after that. 100% chance there are no more parties at that house until that group moves out.

Why don't we ever blame the judges on these things once in a while? I've seen judges clear up problems like these with quick stints in jail. And I don't mean anything serious, just a day or two.

The cycle

"100% chance there are no more parties at that house until that group moves out."

That tends to be the problem. With tenant turnover is so high in this city you really can't teach people a lesson that way if they are going to be gone in a few months anyway. The next group of yeah dudes moves in and the cycle starts again.

Kids will be kids... just

Kids will be kids... just because you didn't have any fun when you were a kid doesn't mean you have to go around acting like Ho Chi Minh. If you want peace and quite and are living in a notorious college neighborhood you're also part of the problem, don't kid yourself.... you should goto jail too for multiple counts of idiocy. :)

Already on that one

Between the early last call, the T shutting down at Midnight, and lack of anywhere to eat after 10 or so, Boston is well on the way to forcing all recent college grads to leave the area.

or maybe they just might grow up sooner?

Theres a difference between recent college grads having a get together, and a house with 200 students having a bash after 1am.

Agreed -- that comment is

Agreed -- that comment is pretty odd. I never had a problem transitioning to adult life by the time I was 21. To be honest, though, the fix is really to set the drinking age back to 18, in conjunction with your recommended progressive sentencing policy. Make it easy to drink in a bar or at a campus sanctioned event. Make it less easy to drink at a kegger.

That and allow happy hours to

That and allow happy hours to give students more incentive to A. drink earlier and B. drink for less. You aren't going to stop a city of college kids from drinking and having a good time, so maybe it's better to change how they are drinking and having a good time....

Or maybe

Boston will just force the ones without jobs to leave the area.

What if their job was hosting parties?

$5 a cup times 250 kids minus five kegs of Natty Ice at 44.99 a keg.......

Thats a good party.

Reality check...

Who are these "fed-up nearby residents"? What kind of person moves into a house / apartment on Ashford Street, next door to a house with greek letters hanging over the front door and a couch on the lawn and doesn't recognize what they're getting in to?

Sure sure... underage drinking, disturbing the peace, blah, blah, blah... It's freaking BU fraternity row! We've seriously got people talking about sending these guys to JAIL for 6 months?

There has been underage drinking by teenagers since the invention of a drinking age, and disturbance of the peace ever since "the peace" was defined... Can we please get a grip, assign them a small fine and a couple hours of community service, and move on with our lives?

I think you might need a reality check....

Those residents have been there a long time and have complained even longer. There are some years where the students are worse than others, but this has been a problem for a long time down there.

If the penalty is a joke, then the law is a joke.

reality check

Heres your reality check, if you decide to live in that neighborhood you have to accept a certian amount of that kind of behavior, so stop trying to be a dictator and move yourself and your family in a more sutiable location than right down the street of a major universtiy. try lower allston or brighton you'll be much happier (or will you?..... you'll have nothing to bit%h about anymore....)

change the law anon then.

Until then, you have to accept what the law is, not what you want it to be.

not rocket science

Mommy and Daddy's precious little BU poopers will sooner or later figure out that if you're going host underage drinking parties, then you'd better keep the noise levels down so no one calls the cops.

Yes indeed, reality check

I don't know which house you're thinking of, but it's not the one in question. 16 Ashford doesn't have Greek letters over the front door or a couch on the lawn, and it's been occupied by Chi Phi for less than a year. It doesn't have a long history as a big party house, unlike, say, 7 Ashford Court or 52 Ashford. And there are certainly people who have lived in the neighborhood for most of their lives (myself included), long before there were any students at all on Ashford or Pratt.

Community service would be great, especially if the next time they send through a community service crew to pick up the trash in the streets they also remember to COLLECT the trash, instead of leaving it in bags that sit all over the neighborhood for months on end.

reality check 1911

i love it when people get on these posts and start spouting about people moving into college neighborhoods. my family built the house i grew up in in 1911. there were no students living in the neighborhood. we were here first and you should respect your neighbors no matter how long they have been there.

Drink all you want, just STFU

Drink all you want, just STFU after 11 PM. Otherwise, I'm calling the President of the School's home number (yes, it CAN be found). Why? Because if I can't sleep, he can't either. :D Frats get shut down REAL fast after that. :DD

Chi Phi party photos

There was a link to some Facebook photos here, but they've been made private, so nothing to see.

Why?

Why would you post something like that? You are not only making matters worse for these kids, but that is disrespectful. Plus, those photos do not indicate anything illegal going on, so you are only posting random people on a website. This helps with no argument.

Because it was interesting?

I'm not sure how linking to a publicly accessible Facebook gallery is disrepectful. If the photos were in a private collection and I somehow got in and made copies and posted those, then, yes, that would be wrong.

Link doesn't work

It just redirects to Facebook's home page -- not even an error message or 404 page.

Ah, they must've noticed the links and turned it off

Basically, it showed a bunch of partyish and outdoor activities.

Seriously....

ALL college kids drink. This is a joke, don't cops have better things to do than break up parties where kids are just relaxing after a week of midterms? Whether it's a fraternity or not, it doesn't matter - if you put college kids in a house off-campus in allston, they WILL throw parties regardless. Don't be stupid and think otherwise. There are a lot bigger things to worry about, like the 5 people that got stabbed in brighton last week. Get real.

what you fail to understand anon

Is that the cops have to respond to these houses if someone calls 911.

Trust me when I say cops would rather be required to actually attend these parties and drink with the students as part of community relations.

And no one is putting them there.

ALL college kids != drink

i was a sober college student and i went to a dry campus. some kids drank, but most didn't.

you do a disservice to all young adults by basically saying that they can't be held to any kind of better standards than animal house antics.

a lot of kids drink. a lot of kids party. fine. but they are still responsible for their actions, and they could behave civilized if they wanted to. drink responsibly and the cops don't show up at your parties.

The problem is the police do

The problem is the police do not need to provide any proof of a noise complaint. If you are familiar with the address you would know that both houses next to the one in question are filled with students who party as well. They know the people who live there, same goes for those across the street. Noise was not an issue, it was simply a planned bust for the local cops. why else would they send a undercover into the party, before a noise complaint was called? Bottom line, there was no complaint called and because the police do not need to file proof of a noise call, they can do whatever they want.

i can hardly understand why people are trying to blow this story out of proportion. ten students arrested could have been 1 student or 50 . it was all up to the police how many people they wanted to take in for any reason at all. not impressed.

no one is impressed.

How do you know there wasn't a complaint for this address? Did you read the report or see the call log?

Of course you didn't

They clearly don't know all the neighbors

The frat boys clearly don't know all their neighbors - I know at least one close neighbor who is not a student and is not amused by massive parties ON A WEEKNIGHT.

It's bad enough that we're supposed to tolerate being tortured all night on Fridays and Saturdays because the only form of fun that's truly fun for the college crowd involves screaming (and firecrackers) in the streets in the wee small hours. The clowns who throw giant parties in the middle of the week deserve everything they get.

Throw the old people out of Allston

Sorry you failed to actually have fun in college, but seeing as I'm not a geriatric yet I'd like to be able to stay up late, dance with my friends, play drinking games, and have FUN (god forbid) before I get old and bitter like all of you.

Seriously, were you ever young?

i was young...

and i was a hellion, thank you very much. which is why i went to rehab and got sober before going back to school. where i then continued to have more fun than i had when i was younger and drank.

listen, kid, i don't mind that other people drink, so don't put that on me. i have an issue with the mandate that *all* kids drink, and your recent one that you can't have fun without drinking.

i may be showing my age, but you are doing any awesome job of showing your immaturity.

now GIT OFF MAH LAWN!

deleting comments

adam G,
why did you delete my previous comment about there not being an actual noise complaint? As i stated before, the police do not have to provide any proof that a noise complaint was ever called. If you were familiar with the area, you would know that the neighbors on both sides of this particular house are students who are friends with the residents. They would not call such a complaint, the police just use "noise" as a way to get into a home.

If there was a noise complaint called, then WHY was there already an undercover cop inside the home? That doesnt make any sense, it just points to the fact that the police had planned to try and bust up the gathering beforehand. I dont see the point in dragging these kids through the mud when they arent hurting anyone...you can keep up the delusion that no one drinks in college but lets be honest, if you bust this party there will be about a hundred other ones going on a few houses down.

I don't recall deleting a post like that

But maybe I'm just getting old.

But I assume the "deleted" post is this one. Here's the deal with anonymous comments: They don't go up right away; they go into a queue where I have to manually mark them for publication (damn spammers ruin everything). Sometimes I don't get to the queue right away, like, I go get something to eat or go cover something where I can't just sit around approving messages. The answer: Get an account and your post will go up automatically, without human intervention.

adam f you simply do not know what you are talking about.

The police will never drive around looking for parties to break up. They don't want to break up parties, it is that simple. Cops would rather drive around, sit somewhere and read the paper, hide and sleep, talk amongst co-workers etc. Breaking up parties is not on the list of things cops want to do during a shift. If the state legistature came up with a law that said people could be as loud as they wanted to inside a house 24/7, the cops would be the first in line to celebrate the new law.

Familiar with the area? You know every single resident in the area? You are that sure that no one would call in a complaint because the residents and students are on good terms?

From what I read in this article is that a noise complaint came into the address, and the cops knew this address as a place where the residents would shut the door on the police. So they got someone young looking that was already in plain clothes, he was invited in and saw first hand (plain view) illegal drinking and the disturbance.

Im sorry but its one of the crappiest parts of going to an urban school.

An emergency?

Anyone else perturbed that these residents "flooded 911" for a noise complaint?

New to Boston?

May not make any sense, but you're supposed to call 911 for anything requiring a police response, even stuff short of knife attacks.

Party line is back

I've never tried it, but they do have a separate number for noise complaints - on the BPD site.

The newspaper clearly got all

The newspaper clearly got all of its information out of the police report. The facts are the party was small only about fifty kids at the house, and that they assumed everyone was drinking at the house. If you really think there was an undercover cop she was not at the house long enough to see everything, considering five cops came busting into the house when a group of girls went to leave. Where was the mention of a breathalyzer? is it a fact that these kids were drinking because it seems a little absurd to arrest someone that was just at a party. Since apparently there was an undercover cop why didn't she try to arrest someone that lives in the house besides ten kids that were just at a party? The cops had a vendetta to stick it to the people that were hosting the party, unfortunately poor cop work led to ten random kids being arrested for being a college student in America.

Lets call Amnesty International..

boo fricking hoo

Good response Pete

These kids should be crying boo fricking hoo. Parties on Ashford street and around Bu are busted numerous times a week. The cops never arrest people at the parties they just tell everyone to leave. They are trying to make an example of these kids who will probably get off with no charges because the cops just arrested ten random kids.

What do you want the cops to do Tom?

Use up hundreds of hours of manpower every single week going to the same house parties and just telling people to leave? They ask them to leave becasue they are using their discresion not to charge them criminally. At some point (after the 5th, 10th, 50th time?), the law probably should be enforced don't you think?

I'd love to hear your opinion on what the police should do. And remember, there are actual laws regarding disrupting the peace, underage drinking etc.

If cops are enforcing the law

If cops are enforcing the law one out of fifty times dont you think the law should change? Considering a law isnt a law if its not enforced.

Ok Tom

But is that the cops problem? Or do you want the cops not to have discresion and simply enforce all laws or just the ones you or the cops think are important?

How about having BPD focus on

How about having BPD focus on actual crime (say, on Harvard Ave) and send BUPD to deal with parties?

So you want a private police force to enfroce these things?

On public property? Or on someones private property? Thats against the law anyway.

Again, the Boston police would love to focus on real crime, but when people call 911 to complain about noise violations, the police HAVE TO RESPOND.

Again, I asked the question about what you think the Boston Police should do if someone calls 911 to complain about noise, and there is actual noise.

A police officer does have to

A police officer does have to respond to a noise complaint, but is it necessary to bring ten police officers to the house to break up the party?If they were responding to a noise complaint two cops instead of ten would have been at the scene. They were clearly mad at the people living in the house, yet they managed to arrest ten random kids that most likely were not at the parties set before this incident.

Ok.

And what do you want those cops to do when no one answers the door?

Why would anyone in there

Why would anyone in there right mind open the door? If you open the door random people are arrested, if you don't the cops will eventually go away.

Oh I get it Ted.

But first, I want you to answer my question. What do you want the cops to do if no one answers the door?

But ok then. So police should just leave, summons in the owners, and then see the owners go to jail when they respond to court for the summons.

That works too.

Or just make it so police don't have to resond to noise complaints and have some other city department handle it. Does that work for you?

And you say random people like these "random" people didn't break the law? They were probably the ones who didn't cooperate.

That's against the law? No

That's against the law?

No actually, BUPD is allowed to patrol and enforce laws outside of the BU area. I've seen BUPD cruisers in Alston, and I've seen MIT cruisers on Bay State road.

BUPD are only allowed to enforce laws on their own properties

unless its a felony. And anyone has the right to do this whether you are a police officer or not.

College police patrol these areas so they can respond to calls on their properties (alarms, thefts, fights,). They can't pull over cars, can't stop people on public property, can't respond to private residences for noise complaints.

BUPD

Just to clerify...
Boston University has 50 state-trained and deputized police officers. All Boston University police officers are empowered by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to enforce criminal law and to make arrests not only on the campus grounds but also in the area surrounding the University. In case you missed something here, BUPD's officers ARE "REAL POLICE OFFICERS" their juristiction is BU's property and interests (surrounding areas. Just like a Malden "REAL POLICE OFFICER"'s juristriction is Malden and a Boston "REAL POLICE OFFICER"'s juristriction is Boston.

almost

Its clear that they could only enforce laws on their own property execpt in the decision from (Brown 2005?) where BUPD made a restraining order arrest on Comm Ave. A little different than enforcing all laws not on campus. And of course they have no authority to pull over motor vehicles on public streets.

They could probably start enforcing loud parties on private property, but they don't, and probably won't in the near future. This was my point about private police forces responding to private houses and enforcing MA general laws on people that might not have an effect on the University.

I think the BUPD is a great police force by the way, better than most cities and towns.

The BUPD werent the arresting

The BUPD werent the arresting officers

BU paper paints picture of students cowering in fear

The Daily Free Press is is not amused by the bust and claims it's obvious BPD is just looking for an excuse to bust some harmless college kids because of murders at Harvard and Brighton avenues:

... If BPD wants to arrest students for hosting parties, it should first make sure they feel safe in their own homes. The still-present threat of spilled blood should run thicker than beer.

Cry me a freakin' river

This editorial just comes off dripping of privilege. "Oh ho! Let the kids be kids and piss off their neighbors! Shouldn't you be out catching murderers!" You don't want to be arrested? Well, don't invite strangers into your party where you're doing illegal things and don't do illegal things and be more considerate of those around you so neither they nor the cops have a reason to come to your front door anyways!

Welcome to real life. Suck it up and stop whining. If you're not 21, don't drink and you won't have to worry about it. Don't do drugs and if you do, don't leave your paraphernalia out in the open at an open-door party. There were about 20 different screw-ups that led to this whole thing being what it was in the end. None of which involve how the cops behaved. Stop displacing the blame and grow up.

PS - The attitude fostered by an opinion piece like this is *exactly* why the cops should do MORE raids just like this.

If you're not 21 what are you supposed to do?

Boston has NOTHING for kids to do on Friday and Saturday nights. All the clubs are 21+ because they don't make any money if they can't serve alcohol. These kids are bored as hell and house parties are

A. cheaper than clubs/bars if you are 21

B. sometimes have good bands that clubs wont hire

C. Give something for bored kids to do on weekends.

We need to give these college kids something fun to do on the weekends.

seems to me...

... that the usual response to people being "shaken by a brazen murder" and have "no sense of security or safety" isn't to smoke up and throw a kegger for 75 of their closest friends.

Party On

I say the cops do what they did when I was a kid. That was kick the hell out of the people who deserved it and leave the good folks alone. When a cop told you to leave ,you left and partied somewhere else. Very simple. Telling cops you know your rights and asking names and badge numbers is asking for trouble. I know not all cops are good people but in todays world most are.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Location

Javascript is required to view this map.