Hey, there! Log in / Register

Rally at the Statehouse, Saturday 26 Noon

IMAGE(http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk143/nfsagan/Rally-To-Save-The-American-.jpg)

In Wisconsin and around our country, the American Dream is under fierce attack. Instead of creating jobs, Republicans are giving tax breaks to corporations and the very rich—and then cutting funding for education, police, emergency response, and vital human services.

On Saturday, February 26, at noon local time, we are organizing rallies in front of every statehouse and in every major city to stand in solidarity with the people of Wisconsin.

  • We demand an end to the attacks on worker's rights and public services across the country.
  • We demand investment, to create decent jobs for the millions of people who desperately want to work.
  • We demand that the rich and powerful pay their fair share.

We are all Wisconsin. We are all Americans.

This Saturday, we will stand together to Save the American Dream. Be sure to wear Wisconsin Badger colors—red and white—to show your solidarity. Sign up today to join in!

Not your cup of tea? Maybe this is. FreedomWorks Tea Party is holding a counter-rally at the same place and at the same time. (Does that seem like a recipe for trouble? If I were planning a counter protest and I wanted to avoid trouble, I'd schedule it at a different time or if the same time, then at a different place.) Here is FreedomWorks description if their counter-rally: "Show these Union thugs, Communists and Socialists what the American Dream REALLY looks like!" How do you show "Union thugs, Communists and Socialists" what the American Dream REALLY looks like? Does it involve provocation?

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Seriosly. HOw does the Wisconsin governors trashing of state workers affect me?

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, just stay at home quietly until they come for you

up
Voting closed 0

eh?

up
Voting closed 0

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me -- and there was no one left to speak for me.

Martin Niemöller

up
Voting closed 0

I see. The GOP is radically transforming the rules to benefit the GOP and their corporate allies, in this case Koch, without refard to how it effects Joe the so-called plumber.

That's why Walker passed corporate tax cuts in January before sticking it to private sector workers in February, demanding 18% more of their take home to fund health care and retirement benefits they earn. Folks squeezing to get buy would get less in the future and pay more for it.

So if they win this fight, all low and middle class folks will get less in the long run. It's the new neo-feudalism. You don't work for yourself, you work in debt for others.

Someone should try to tell the Tea Party folks that for the Koch Brothers "freedom" means more profits for the Koch Brothers: They don't really care much for the rest of us. David Koch ran for vice president in 1980. His ticket got 1% of the national vote probably becuase his big ideas were to end Social Security, the CIA and the FBI. This is what these people think is good government.

up
Voting closed 0

We are staging a creative, peaceful protest/sit-in in front of a Boston branch of Bank of America to say NO to recent budget cuts, and demand an end to corporate tax evasion and loopholes.

http://www.usuncut.org/actions/24

up
Voting closed 0

It's an anti-circumcision campaign.

oy.

up
Voting closed 0

Gathering in front of the Bank of America branch across from Out of Town News kiosk, the protest, now 40 strong, picketed the Bank as a security officer and about five Cambridge cops looked on. The police were smiling, and only interfered to keep the picketing to one side of the sidewalk.

Someone reminded me that this particular bank had merged at least four times; before BoA grabbed it, it was a BayBank; before that a Fleet Bank; originally -- and for many years-- Harvard Trust. In a nutshell, that's how the financial services sector is gobbling up local assets all over America and funneling profits into executives' and investors' private accounts. By the way, the Clinton Administration was responsible for removing major legal impediments that enabled corporations to make this vast takeover, so don't just blame Republicans.

Video & Pictures: http://www.usuncut.org/actions/24#gallery

up
Voting closed 0

I'm a Tea Party member, but from my perspective isn't this the pot calling the kettle black? When Democrats are elected aren't they supposed to clamp down on those rascally Corporations? Unions donate to liberal Democrat politicians far more consistently that Corporations donate to Republicans (GE is an example). So when Republicans are elected they will clamp down on those rascally Unions. I shed no tears for either side. Both have bankrupted our country serving their friends. Neither has thought about the good of the country as a whole for a very long time.

up
Voting closed 0

Oligarchs vs the Middle Class

up
Voting closed 0

Ah yes, the Koch brothers. Next you'll be telling us there is a "vast right-wing conspiracy" too. And that 9/11 was an inside job and "BushHitler is the REAL terrorist."

You do get your talking points from the Far Left playbook, don't ya, troll?

Yawn.

up
Voting closed 0

That's ok, he bores me too.

up
Voting closed 0

Sorry if outing the Koch Brothers and their antidemocratic conspiracies worthy of RICO action bore you. Doesn't make them less true, real, or factual.

Like a typical wingnut, your inability to deal with reality becomes a badge of idiocy rather than a fatal flaw in your character worthy of derision that it should be.

up
Voting closed 0

^the ignorant masses

up
Voting closed 0

Wisconsin's tea party-backed governor, Scott Walker, has launched an ideological crusade against his own citizens' collective bargaining rights. He's using the pretense of a state budget deficit to curb the rights of teachers and other public employees in his state to unionize -- rights we've recognized here in America for over 80 years to assure better working conditions and fairer compensation for all workers.

I just signed Senator Dick Durbin's petition supporting the fourteen brave Democratic state senators -- backed by tens of thousands of ordinary citizens protesting outside the State Capitol -- boycotting a vote on the governor's plan.

Please join me in showing your support for the "Wisconsin 14's" boycott, and stand up against Governor Walker's assault on the rights of American workers.

Thanks,

up
Voting closed 0

n/t

up
Voting closed 0

Mine is Jim Sullivan. What's yours?

Suldog
http://jimsuldog.blogspot.com

up
Voting closed 0

How is it brave to avoid one's responsibilities? Rather than participating in the democratic process, including debate and voting on legislation brought before them per the requirements of their jobs, these state senators have LEFT THEIR OWN STATE! That's not taking a stand, that's the legislative equivalent of holding their breath and stamping their feet because they're not getting their way.

up
Voting closed 0

Uh no. There wasn't going to be any debate. That's why they left. The governor and his legislative cronies were just going to use them for a quorum and railroad it through.

You fail.

up
Voting closed 0

With debate or without debate, that's pretty much how the system works. A quorum is present, and the majority decides what gets done. Sabotaging the entire process by going on the lam doesn't reflect the best traditions of representative democracy.

up
Voting closed 0

Do you have reason to believe that there is fraud involved? Were elections rigged? Have the rules in WI been changed so that a Republican vote counts more than a Democratic one?

Just because a vote is not going to go your way, you still need to do your job and attend the vote. All of government would come to a screaching halt if politicians refused to even vote on items they don't like.

up
Voting closed 0

You mean like what happened in the US Senate for the past few years?

Where Republicans blocked every single piece of legislation as long as possible, even stuff they supported in the end?

The rules permit it. The rules also permit the Senators in WI to not be present. Why shouldn't they do it then? Should the rules be changed? Probably. But until then, that's how it is.

up
Voting closed 0

Are you a liberal stooge or just stupid?

Your response in this thread and others make you seem just like another knee-jerk dittohead. You and some of these tea-party types are two sides of the same coin. It's a coin we could all do without.

up
Voting closed 0

Gov Walker never mentioned his plan for unions when he was campaigning. This move to take collective bargaining rights from teachers and nurses is a bomb he dropped on Wisconsin (his words: "drop a bomb") So, he cannot claim to have a mandate to pass this. I know this becuase I watched an interview with his opponent in last fall's election, the mayor of Milwaukee.

Second, the bill is extremely unpopular in Wisconsin. 61% oppose it. Walker pretends Democracy is a winner take all game. It is not. The will of the people is the purpose of representational government. That includes election day and subsequently too.

Third, using the quorum call, a legislative procedure, to block the bill is every bit as reasonable as using the filibuster which the GOP used a record number of times in the US Senate in 2009 and 2010, blowing away the previous use of it by three fold.

Four, the Wisconsin assembly (house) passed the bill last night. Now it goes to the Wisconsin Senate. Assembly speaker pro tem took the vote at 1:20 AM BEFORE 15 Democratic assemblymen had a chance to speak. The vote lasted 10 seconds and many senators were not given enough time to vote. Rammed it through.

In Wisconsin, there is a process for public comment. Over 500 cheeseheads testified about their objections to the bill, 400 were told they could not. That's not democracy. That's ram it through.

Republican assemblymen complained that their neighbors weren't speaking to them anymore. Just wait.

Budget repair is supposed to be a tool to manage finance issues. This bill is loaded with policy issues, some of which are giveaways to corporate interests like Koch Energy. One clause permits the governor to sell the states energy assets (electrical power plants, etc) with no bids!!! NO Bids means no competition and crony capitalism. Sweatheart deals for political allies. That's not Democracy. That's corruption.

I thought Republicans were FREE MARKET types that believed in good financial management. If the state is going to sell its power plants, shouldn't they get top dollar rather then screwed? If this passes they will get screwed by Walker's closed door crony capitalism deal for Koch Industries as payback for $42,000 in campaign contributions plus $1,000,000 in negative advertising for Walker opponent.

up
Voting closed 0

If by 'rammed it through' you mean voted, then yeah.

Effin democracy.

up
Voting closed 0

MA will be facing similar problems - we'll see what the D party does then, when the unions refuse to budge. Default?

up
Voting closed 0

“Unions are good — and they can be part of the solution,” Gov. Deval Patrick wrote. “Public sector unions have demonstrated over and over again their and your willingness to work with us to build a stronger commonwealth.”

“The attack on public sector employees and their unions is wrong for Massachusetts,” he added. “As long as I have anything to say about it, we will continue to modernize our government and renew our social contract with balance and respect.”

Deval Patrick 2/22/2011

up
Voting closed 0

Better make sure this isn't held on Evacuation Day - no government workers will show up. Of course, the rest of us will be working to pay for their bogus holiday.

up
Voting closed 0

ALL of us, not just those who pull a taxpayer-fudned union salary!

Which side are YOU on?

up
Voting closed 0

Because I'm pretty sure the "side of the taxpayers" wants its trash picked up, a quality education for its kids, and its streets plowed when it snows.

...or are you just a moron who thinks this is all about "bloated union contracts" when the state wasn't even in trouble until it gave all its money away to out-of-state corporations in tax breaks?

up
Voting closed 0

then? Or at least the overwhelming majority of taxpayers who aren't public-sector union employees?

Much of it is about bloated union contracts and excessive giveaways to public sector unions, and onerous laws and regs designed to limit competition (not to mention savings and efficiencies) in the delivery of the services you mention... or are you a just moron who believes in insulting others who dare differ from your dogma and mindlessly spouting the pro-union line?

(Are you AFL-CIO? NAGE? Or SEIU?)

up
Voting closed 0

This "taxpayers vs unions" mentality you're carrying is paradoxically incomprehensible. You've bought into the garbage from the corporations and Republicans who are attempting to pit the middle class against the middle class while they reap the benefits.

The "bloated union contracts" for public employees were okayed BY THE LEGISLATURES. That's your representatives and mine. It's not like the unions had some kind of great leverage or made their own contracts up. The "excessive giveaways" just DON'T EVEN EXIST. The pensions in Wisconsin (and most other state pensions) are a percentage of the BASE SALARY of the employees being put aside to be collectively invested by the state so that they can get it later during retirement. It's money these people ALREADY EARNED. Their pensions are ONE HUNDRED PERCENT their money just loaned to the state and now the state is claiming they have to "pay more"...which doesn't even make any sense.

Forbes magazine (yes, conservative FORBES magazine!) puts it in plain English for you: states weren't putting what they promised aside, they were investing so poorly (on investing advice from guys like Goldman Sachs...who then bet AGAINST the states' investments!!), they promised more compensation but didn't budget for it in future budgets, and promised retiree healthcare but didn't fund it either.

Any of that sound like it was the employees' faults?? The TAXPAYER wasn't paying attention while their elected representatives were screwing up the state's budgets. I'm all for the taxpayer but WE screwed up...so how is THAT the union members' faults? THEY worked for their money. They paid their taxes too. They should expect their just compensation that they've been promised by the people we put there to make these decisions who are now trying to ignore and back out of what WE taxpayers promised them. The whole thing is a monumental cock-up by pretty much everyone involved...except one group: the union members. What have they done wrong?

Hell, in Wisconsin, they're even willing to take a few lumps for the team...but their ability to bargain in the future has NOTHING to do with the current budget issues. Why should they give up their right to come to the table?

I'm not a union member. Most of my entire family isn't in any union of any kind. But I am intelligent and capable of forming my own opinions based on the facts and not what some Republican jackass like Walker has to say. You don't seem like you've actually examined a single fact. You just want to paint me with a brush that you're familiar with..if I'm just a pro-union crony then you can safely ignore me, right? Because that doesn't fit your world view that these union people are some how draining us all dry without thinking about the rest of us, right?

Well, wake up, Sparky. The only people bleeding the rest of us dry are the ones at the top who keep taking our money, paying less and less in taxes to compensate for the size of their financial footprint on the rest of us, and the entire middle class is having to shoulder their burden as a result. If you refuse to realize what's going on outside of your cloistered bubble of artificial reality, you're part of the problem that got us here. They used their money and clout to raid our government funds (because we were already drying up in every other way due to their removal of industry and jobs overseas). We didn't do anything about it. We just bought the corporate-run media who kept us pre-occupied with nonsense and lacked any depth of coverage on the real direction we've let ourselves be led in. You think this is about "unions" vs. the "taxpayers", but it's really about the powerful vs. the rest of us. You're in the same boat as the rest of us, so wake up and stop trying to drill holes in it, asshole.

up
Voting closed 0

"corporations and Republicans"... yawn.
Try having an original thought for once, will ya?

And the current ELECTED legislature and Chief Executive in Wisconsin are seeking to pare back the exorbitant costs to ALL taxpayers that excessive union demands have brought to their state, not what Big Labor-beholden political jackasses sought to deliver to their union masters to pander for their votes. We need some of that here.

Wake up, sporto- the days of milking taxpayers are over... "asshole."

(BTW- what is it with you pro-union types? Always with the hateful invective and violence. Easier than thoughtful discussion I guess.)

up
Voting closed 0

They have limits on their powers to pull stuff out of there rear ends and call it law.

Because I'm The Governor And I Say So isn't democracy - that's insanity or just being an idiot petty tyrant. Walker seems to be pretty much "limits on power" challenged at best.

Then again, you probably are naive and foolish enough to believe that the conditions that led to the revolution were the result of dealing with a likely insane and "tyrannical" king. The colonial uprisings that begat the US were actually the result of the behavior of the 18th century equivalent of corporations - the Royally chartered entities - that had gained excessive power over commerce and economy in the colonies while unchecked by monarch not fit to or able to govern effectively. That might take a bit of study to understand, and is probably beyond you to grasp. Just because you are tired of hearing about corporate interference in our governments doesn't make it any less toxic or true.

up
Voting closed 0

I notice you cite "quality education" as something at risk if public sector unions are not allowed to continue enjoying lavish benefits and a defined benefit pension plan as well as corrupt influence over democratic pols, which are the benefit of union largesse each and every election cycle so long as they keep make promises with taxpayer dollars....

I'm sorry, when did private, parochial and charter schools become unionized?

up
Voting closed 0

Name one "lavish benefit" a Wisconsin teacher gets or shut the hell up.

And it better be torch and pitchfork worthy.

up
Voting closed 0

at a rate FAR below that of the private sector. Compensation that is comparable to the private sector (and in the case of teachers almost always is much higher than many private school educators earn, despite the often poorer preformances of public schools) but with few of the risks of layoffs that people in the real world have? And union contracts that make it virtually impossible to fire all but the very worsr of the worst.

But I get it- you and your ilk are satisfied with the status quo, in terms of stewarship of taxpayer $$$ and public union-worker performance (or lack thereof.) Many of us are not.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm in a public union. I pay at least as much toward my health care than I did in my previous private sector job, but now I have a deductible which I didn't have in my private sector job health care plan, and my copayments are higher.

up
Voting closed 0

Prove it.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm on the side of workers. I'm in a union. I am also a taxpayer.

up
Voting closed 0

Remembering that pensions are payment deferred for work already done, see this story: Wall St. stole it all: http://bit.ly/gplKD8

up
Voting closed 0

In Wisconsin last year Republicans with the help of the Tea-Party won big even though they were outspent by the Democrats. Now the governor and the Legislature are setting about doing exactly what they promised they would do: Cutting taxes to improve employment, controling govt. union power and cutting back on pension and health benifits to control the state budget.

In Massachusetts the Democrats with the help of the unions were the ones who won big. The Governor and the legislature HERE will set about doing, well, NOT what they promised but which any sensible person could see was consequence of the election: Raise taxes and cut local aid.

In 2012 there will be another election and voters from both states will be able to decide which corse of action they most approve of. They will look at things like their tax bill, the states' employment rates and the pensions and benefits to public employees compared to their own.

If the voters of Wisconsin are sufficiently unhappy with what the governor and legislature has done they will throw enough Republicans of office to begin reversing course, to return to the unions their powers and benefits and to raise taxes anew.

If the voters of Massachusett finally get fed up with the usual way of doing things on Beacon Hill they will throw enough Democrats out of office to begin the process of genuine reform which might include, amoung other things, a Right to Work law.

But here is the thing: Having gone to the demo on Tuesday of last week, I really don't get the feeling that the unions are very happy with this democracy thing if it doesn't go their way. It's almost as if unions are institutions that exist PRIOR to representative government and have a veto over what it does. And these unions and MoveOn.org groups are not "standing with Wisconsin" unless the only real Wisconsonians (?) are the ones that voted Democrat. After all, what Representative Capuano wanted to them to get "bloody in the streets" over was the actions of a legitimatly elected government which had NOT concealed its agenda before the election. Tuesday's union demonstration seemed to be saying to the Commonwealth's voters, "Don't even THINK of getting so uppity as to vote this way."

up
Voting closed 0

It doesn't make you immune to limits on executive power, give authority to declare a crisis and nullify rights, or provide unchecked authority to do as you please to satisfy your financial backers and people whose arses you promised to kiss.

LIMITS ON POWER AND AUTHORITY are part of what is called a REPUBLIC. The US is NOT a DEMOCRACY but a REPUBLIC.

Perhaps you should read up on the differences, and why our founders set things up such that the majority and that executives had limitations on their abilities to trample the rights of minorities and the citizenry.

up
Voting closed 0

"The US is NOT a DEMOCRACY but a REPUBLIC."

Actually it's both (the two are not mutually exclusive).

up
Voting closed 0

Isn't North Korea a Democratic Republic?

up
Voting closed 0

The (translated) full name of North Korea is "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea" and the full name of South Korea is just the "Republic of Korea."

up
Voting closed 0

"The US is NOT a DEMOCRACY but a REPUBLIC."

The first time I heard someone make the distinction when when I ran into an old friend about ten years ago. He's a hard-core right-winger who worked for Pat Buchanan's presidential campaign, and I learned that 'republic, not a democracy' was a far right-wing talking point. If you listen to Rush and the rest of the right wing talk radio types, you'l recognize it.

Interesting to see it quoted here in bed-wetting-liberal-land.

up
Voting closed 0

Language evolves. The Democracy/Republic distinction has shifted quite a bit since the days of the Founding Fathers, as the idea of "rule by the people" gradually started to seem less scary. The term for a government led by representatives elected by the people which also places restrictions on its own power to assure the rights of the governed is generally called "Liberal Democracy" by political science types.

up
Voting closed 0

Capitol Police Plan to Vacate the Capitol in Madison WI at 4PM; Civil Disobedience Planned. MORE

up
Voting closed 0

Here's a live feed of the protest in the rotunda in Madison WI. I wonder if the capitol police will leave it on while they arrest all of the cheeseheads (I mean out-of-state- union thug) who remain in the capitol after 4PM.

up
Voting closed 0

A unionized employee, a Tea Party member & a corporate CEO are sitting at a table. In the middle is a plate with a dozen cookies on it. The CEO reaches out & takes 11 of the cookies, then says to the Tea Party member "look out for that union guy, he wants a piece of your cookie."

up
Voting closed 0