Hey, there! Log in / Register

Slipper stripper loses job over $300 lap dance

A stripper caught by Boston Police detectives as she writhed on top of a patron at the Glass Slipper on LaGrange Street no longer works at the club, a manager told the Boston Licensing Board today.

Det. William Gallagher told the board that during a routine inspection around 1 a.m. on Oct. 27, he and another detective found a male patron lying on a couch on the club's third floor, a dancer on top of him, his hands gripping her buttocks. That violated state and city regulations, including Adult Entertainment regulation 1C, which specifically forbids customers from being allowed to grab a dancer's buttocks. Gallagher said the customer had paid $300 for the dance.

Glass Slipper manager Nicholas Germano did not dispute Gallagher's account of the $300 "private party" in a room set up for private parties.

Germano said dancers are told of the relevant regulations. Normally, a first violation results in a warning, but in this case, "it was so flagrant that we dismissed her immediately" after the club got a copy of Gallagher's report, he said.

Last year, club managers accepted similar responsibility for a similar lap dance.

The board decides Thursday what action, if any, to take about the infraction.

Neighborhoods: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

A "routine inspection," my ass.

Cripes, that was not punny.

up
Voting closed 0

The club had no choice; the detectives had them by the balls.

up
Voting closed 0

So...I see one of two options here.

Either the cops arrived just before that lap dance became prostitution...or that guy is a moron since $300 can buy you ACTUAL sex anywhere else in the city (ahem....according to data I heard back when Eliot Spitzer got caught paying $1000/hr for his over-priced hooker).

up
Voting closed 0

Nobody is that stupid.

up
Voting closed 0

For the sake of my fairest Nicole, I certainly hope that the detectives spared her sensibilities and did not recount all of the crude details of what transpires within such a maison de tolérance. It is not meet that a lady of her character should be exposed to base coarseness, or even to be apprised of the existence of such an establishment. It stands as tribute to her strength and to her commitment to the public good that she endured the testimony without swooning right away.

up
Voting closed 0

about to suggest that perhaps the licensing board could do a little reenactment, you know, to educate themselves about what might have transpired.

up
Voting closed 0