Hey, there! Log in / Register

Yes, Elizabeth Warren is running for the Senate

Her announcement. Maybe now that she's officially in the race, she'll stop treating all of her campaign stops, such as her formal announcement at the Broadway T stop this morning, as state secrets (reporters were told in advance, of course, but only on the condition they not tell anybody).

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

. . . That wears a Commonwealth of Massachusetts flag on their lapel and seeks to represent the interests of Massachusetts first and foremost and above those of DC and "America". Or in other words I won't be voting for anyone.

up
Voting closed 0

I've met Setti Warren and was very, VERY impressed with him in person.

up
Voting closed 0

Did she arrive in a truck?

up
Voting closed 0

I won't have to be driving to NH this year to "Make a difference".

Great news. That sound you hard this morning was a big grumble coming from Wrentham.

/Refused to even vote for Coakley, will work for Warren

up
Voting closed 0

I voted for Coakley ONLY because she wasn't Scott Brown. I will not be donating to Obama this time around unlike last time. However, I am going to see about volunteering to help Warren.

up
Voting closed 0

The problem is we need 60 votes and 1/2 the house.

Dem's who have soured on him are doing exactly what teahadists want. Their plan is to turn dem's on one another, and ruin the economy so much that voters vote for the other guy. Stop whining and work toward a super majority so Obama can actually get something passed.

While I'm disappointed that more isn't getting done, we need to face the truth that Obama can't simply wave his hands and make things happen in our form of government. Personally, I think he's played the teabaggers for the extreme nihilists they are. It's not going unnoticed to those who only go and vote every 4 years.

Anyone who though that one election would bring about some progressive utopia was fooling themselves. It was the first step, not the finish line. You don't build a political policy movement without years of groundwork and changing minds. Obama's been a great first step.

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, Obama has been dealt a group of Republicans who have turned our political structure into a game and the only way for them to win is to nuke the other side. I am well aware of that. You're not dealing with a simpleton who has soured on Obama because we're not living in a progressive utopia 3 years later. I'm well aware of the complex political landscape we live in. It's also why Warren will not only get my vote, but probably some of my hard-earned time.

However, Obama has not handled the game as it's been given to him very well at all. There have been escape hatches for him to take in the political processes. Yet, he's refused to use them in lieu of expecting the broken parts of our legislative system to suddenly snap back together as if the people that broke it suddenly cared about the effects of breaking it. On top of that, there have been very real ways were he has exposed himself to be far less progressive than he first positioned himself during the campaign. He has the ability to do more about ending our wars than he's chosen to do so far. He makes his recent speeches using the extremely flawed logic and terminology of the side that's attacking the country with a wrecking ball (he's allowing them to play on home turf and with their own rules rather than flip the script to more progressive rhetoric). He even went so far recently as to ignore his own appointed EPA head and hold to the "legally indefensible" ground ozone levels of the Bush administration...an action that took absolutely no input from the intransigents. He has also refused to task the Justice Department with investigating war crimes nor malfeasance in the banking industry...again, actions that would need no input from the other side. He has also basically done nothing to identify and hammer at the root causes of our current troubles, again playing by the Republican script of "debt resolution" being the means to better days.

You and HenryAlan are right. I'm not voting for the Republican candidate and if it came down to it then I'm probably voting for Obama in 2012...but definitely not a single dollar or hour of my time will be dedicated to helping him get elected. He's not the candidate he claimed to be in 2008 (there are entire websites dedicated to 2007 Obama vs 2011 Obama) and he's consistently pushed forward policy after policy from the Bush era that he alone has the means of controlling. That's not even me demanding a progressive utopia. That's me disappointed at our continuance as a jackbooted regime. There's an entire neutral ground he seems dedicated to keeping us out of as well.

Sorry about the national level political discussion, I know we try not to do that here...I just had to clarify because it felt I was being painted with too simple a brush.

up
Voting closed 0

unless you want to see Rick Perry or some other Republican take the Whitehouse. That's the choice, and while I can understand disappointment with Obama (much of which I blame on voter expectations), that doesn't make us better off with the alternative.

up
Voting closed 0

Wall Street's favorite Senator versus Wall Street's nightmare. Maybe Warren can also ask to go to Afghanistan for "training".

up
Voting closed 0

Fair is fair. While not in the NG, she's a lawyer too. Maybe they can share a desk inside.

up
Voting closed 0

Setti Warren, now Betty Warren? Reminds me of JFK's 1946 Democrat primary for Congress against Joseph Russo, among others, when corrupt old man Joe entered a second Joseph Russo to confuse the voters. I can't help but wonder if Karzai or Massie put her in the race. It will be great to see them all try to out-liberal each other in the primary, then have the victor race back to mainstream positions in the final. Who will Obama endorse or does anybody want that alcatraz albatross? As an unenrolled, I may have to pull a Democrat ballot in that primary.

up
Voting closed 0

Don't let anyone every say you aren't dependable. Clever - not. But dependable.

up
Voting closed 0

Voter fraud in action guys. It's not fraud when you're doing it for the "right" team.

Remember this next time Fish complains about voter fraud / intimidation BS.

up
Voting closed 0

in Massachusetts unenrolled voters can vote in the primary and are expected to select a partisan ballot.

up
Voting closed 0

No matter what the liberal elite tell you....she is not a viable candidate....Politics 101 Base…where is the Harvard Professor from Kansas base of support? Setti, Krazy Khazi et al have the moon bat vote on lock down. Good luck Joyce Linehan and her other phony sycophants …it’s easy to be a guru when you’re the only candidate in town, lets watch Joyce drum up support for this train wreck. Take Pernice on tour and give it a rest, no one beats Brown …..good bad or indifferent !!

up
Voting closed 0

Oklahoma.

How long does one have to live in Massachusetts to be considered a non-foreigner to folks like you?

up
Voting closed 0

Considering the fact that 3/4 of those polled in July loved the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and considering she was the primary impetus for the creation of this bureau (and probably feels it wasn't strong enough as it was established anyways) and considering she was played like a pawn by Republican Senators who held up her confirmation purely to try and leverage Obama into watering down the CFPB's powers....

If she runs a good campaign touting the successes she's ALREADY had in DC while fighting for the middle class against politics-as-usual and Big Finance, she'll win against Brown who has been a surprisingly decent stop-gap but ultimately has occasionally voted along party lines and opposed the will of the MA public (see below).

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/06/15/246013/mb...
http://videos.masslive.com/2011/08/500_mass_reside...
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinio...

up
Voting closed 0