Hey, there! Log in / Register

If a tree falls in a park and a softball player is under it, the city might have to pay damages, court rules

The Supreme Judicial Court ruled today the city of Newton will have to show a lower court why it shouldn't be made to pay a softball player for serious injuries caused by a tree falling on him while he was waiting his turn at bat.

Edward Marcus sued Newton for negligence for the two broken vertebrae and two broken shoulder blades he suffered in July 8, 2007, when a tree rooted on land owned by Temple Shalom fell on him as he sat at McGrath Field. Marcus says the city failed to protect people by not pruning back the part of the tree that reached over the park.

The city, however, asked the judge in the case to simply dismiss the case, because state law exempts owners of parkland from suits if they don't charge a fee to access the land, and Marcus had not paid a fee to use the park that day.

Not so fast, the state's highest court countered. Although Marcus did not make out a check to the city of Newton, he did pay Coed Jewish Sports $80 to participate in its softball league, and the organization in turn paid Newton $1,200 for the right to use the park - with the money helping to defray the $12,000 a year Newton spends to maintain the park.

That Marcus did not pay directly to the city its permit fee to reserve McGrath Field is not material. What matters is that the city imposed this fee or charge for the exclusive use of the field during the reserved blocks of time; Coed Jewish Sports paid the fee on behalf of its league players, including Marcus; and he was injured while playing a game on the field during one of the reserved blocks of time. In the circumstances, Marcus was not participating in a recreational use of the city's property free of charge.

Neighborhoods: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

cut back infrastructure upkeep and repair, this is going to get worse. It's easy to cut back and call it spending cuts and saving money when the bad effects usually don't show up years or decades later.

Romney slashed funding to the state school systems and infrastructure repair. Anyone seen our roads lately, or costs of instate tuition?

But Liberty Mutual got a nice huge tax break for doing what they were going to do anyways. So I guess there's that.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm not a Mitt apologist but he hasn't ran the state since approximately 2004 when he started trashing us in the welfare states down south. Deval hasn't exactly restored the budget.

up
Voting closed 0

But he has managed the ship through an ice field. 2004-2006 is really when the shit hit the fan (economy) and states saw huge drops in revenues from all sources of income.

MA has done less belt tightening, but one only needs to look at our roads to see where the money to allow that was siphoned from.

I'm all for belt tightening in good times, and spending in bad; but it can't be done on the backs of our investments and future. Infrastructure and Education get cut to put money in the rainy day fund, rather then tax loopholes, give aways, and useless political apparition like the TPA, which is still technically around and only serves to pay it's employees with the doll it collects.

up
Voting closed 0

...hits a member of the congregation (or someone attending the temple's sports program) and the *city* has to pay?

up
Voting closed 0

I took a look at the website for coed jewish sports and it didn't seem as though they were affiliated with any particular temple.

That being said, it's odd that the actual owners of the tree would be less liable than the city. Maybe that's a different lawsuit?

up
Voting closed 0

Because the tree limb goes over the property line, responsibility lies with the owner on the side the limb is on. The owner of the roots only applies if the problem with the limb comes from a problem caused at the roots or if the roots owner did something to make the limb fall over the other side.

Similarly, our neighbor had the right to trim limbs of our trees where they crossed over her land (and especially over her house).

up
Voting closed 0