Knesset debate interrupted in Newton

I got my statistics from things like official reports from the League of Nations in 1920.

Second, I never came close to saying it was okay for anyone to lob missles. Nor did I even mention Hamas or whether I think their approach is correct or even justified. Those are all things you have come up with out of thin air.

It is undeniable that Arabs lived in the area 70 years ago. There were about 800,000 to 1.3 million of them between the 1930s and early 1940s. Your description of an arid wasteland comes from a limited number of testimonials from the late 1800s. They don't account for other eyewitnesses who visited regions like the Jezreel Valley and found wheat and barley crops and lush soil (see the above link).

Of course, it's easier for you to characterize the situation as an aggressive Arab population, disgusting outcasts from Jordan really, demanding the now fertile and livable lands from the Israelis that the Arabs had abandoned long ago. It makes it easier to condemn them, right? However, that view of the situation is simply not true and in fact gives rise to the sort of animosity from the remaining Arabs whose families were deposed by the British and still find that process continuing to this day.

I'm not interested in propaganda, Israel's or Palestine's, but it's clear you have a bias against Palestinians. To ignore important historical context as to how both sides have arrived in their current position or to unilaterally support one side over the other given how neither one has remained free from aggression or fault in the matter will never allow for a peaceful solution to both peoples' problems.