Hey, there! Log in / Register
Allston merchants say World Series parking bans go too far
By adamg on Tue, 10/29/2013 - 10:08am
Scott Matalon says he came home from a weekend trip to find Harvard and Brighton avenues plastered with signs banning parking on Wednesday and Thursday between 4 p.m. and 2 a.m.
Matalon, owner of Stingray Body Art and president of Allston Village Main Streets, says the move is not just annoying, in an area miles from past championship violence - it's a business killer, because for Allston, Halloween is more like Black Thursday; it's "the biggest spending days we have."
"It kills the restaurants," he said, adding other businesses will also suffer when many of their customers can't park anywhere near them.
Matalon says he appreciates police wanting to keep celebrations from getting out of hand, but "there's preventative medicine and then there's overkill," especially in a business district "miles from Kenmore Square."
Matalon, who noted police have turned to this street clearing technique after other championship drives over the past couple of years, said neither he nor other merchants were notified ahead of time about the parking bans.
Boston Metro has some more on the parking bans, which will also include the Faneuil Hall area on Wednesday, when President Obama visits to push Obamacare in a speech there.
Neighborhoods:
Topics:
Free tagging:
Ad:
Support Universal Hub
Help keep Universal Hub going. If you like what we're up to and want to help out, please consider a (completely non-deductible) contribution.
Comments
Seriously?
What percent of business is from on-street parking? You should probably just relocate if this is a total killer -- doesn't sound like you're in the right neighborhood.
EDIT: All that said, I *do* think this area is a bit too far from Fenway to be putting restrictions on parking.
Basement-dwelling anonymous
Basement-dwelling anonymous troll preaches to local business owners over internet.
So... you would know better about what's good for these businesses than the business owners themselves? You think mighty highly of yourself. Get a job.
says an anon
Urb does have a job.. and Urb does know this stuff very well. Do not question the Urb.
What?
I live in an apartment which is not below ground, and it is not owned by my mother so I am paying my own way, and without a trust fund either (before that gets thrown out there next).
I do not think it means what you think it means.
Okay, ya' got me there.
Must have missed the preaching.
I work two. And I help out my family's business during holiday seasons. I'm also an [ignored] armchair consultant for the MBTA.
Urb is A-OK , he knows his
Urb is A-OK , he knows his onions.
Parking ban probably excessive, but....
I agree that it is unlikely that a substantial amount of business around there depends on on-street parking, however, knowing that the margins for restaurants are quite thin, it could still be disruptive.
I also agree that a parking ban is a little excessive, however, increased police presence and stricter enforcement is probably not - I do not believe that the merchant is correct in saying they are miles from any championship violence - I saw some (limited) violence down there after a Patriots Super Bowl win, after the one of the Red Sox WS wins and after Brazil won the world cup (2002?). It was nothing extremely violent, but it doesn't take much for things to escalate after some idiot gets it going.
The merchant is absolutely right that they should have been given more notice.
The parking ban around Faneuil Hall for the President is totally reasonable, routine, and should not surprise anyone.
What kind of statement is
What kind of statement is that? That location is near the Green Line but many customers probably do not live on the Green Line so they drive there. There are very limited parking options in that area. A business should re-locate if many of its customers drive? What?
Uhm...
Why wouldn't they? If my business was starving due to a lack of parking, I'm not going to demand parking subsidies and eminent domain to make parking lots. Your clientele base drives? Then you should be somewhere for driving.
I wouldn't mind so much if these owners were complaining about market rate parking.
Parking isn't for customers
Anyone who lives downtown knows that most suburbanites don't drive into the city with the expectation of finding street parking. If you do, it's a bonus and if you don't it's an inconvenience, but you just pony up and pay. On street parking is largely for employees. Perhaps it's different in A/B - but most of downtown is filled with workers at various retail establishments that drive in and play feed the meter and the 2 hour shuffle where the limits are enforced.
As I said below. Does it
As I said below. Does it require a business to starve for their complaint to be valid? Lost business is lost business. Even if they are still in the black, it doesn't mean their complaint is invalid or you telling them to move. I like to think the owners knows their own business more than you would.
Their complaint is about a parking ban in a bad time. It could be justified (most justifiable is preparation for any rioting), but regardless, I don't see it reasonable to disparage them. I acknowledge and look to you for you knowledge of city design and especially the MBTA. But this just seem to be hostile because the group inconvenienced is car users.
street festivities
It may be a significant distance from Fenway, but the bars (and houses) will be full of folks watching the game and as soon as it is over- they will stream out into the streets (well, they will if the Sox win) , particularly at the intersection of Brighton and Harvard, which is where I saw the no parking signs. Or at least- that's what I observed last time the Sox were in the World Series....
2004 or 2007?
Which year was the burning couch placed in the center of that intersection again?
See, this is why we can't have nice things...like parking for businesses at 4 PM.
Business
Thank you anono for taking a reasonable rebutting point and making it look like an ass. Why did you have to the first responder over anyone else who would see the same point?
I think it is perfectly sympathizable at the parking bans are disruptive for their business. To dismiss the owners that the cars are insignificant business is presumptuous as it requires to claim expertise of their business over the owners. Not to mention insulting to tell the owners to move just because they says cars are a major source of their business. Just because it is Allston with a lot of pedestrian business does not mean the people parking are any less valuable. I recognize Urb knowledge for urban design, but I can't but feel some of this dismissiveness is because the receiving end is cars and its drivers.
I do want to say this though. If the above wasn't posting those points above, I probably only be pointing out this. The parking may also have a safety reason. While I think Boston after multiple championships have learn to handle themselves better, I wouldn't be surprise this is also a precationary tactic to anyone wanting to vandalize cars. Regardless of the parking bans, I am hesitant to park my car in any of those areas tomorrow or Thursday around/past game time.
business owners and on-street parking
Business owners are famous for massively overestimating the effect that street parking has on them. Allston is no exception. It's a densely populated area with significant numbers of local customers patronizing businesses, the Green Line alone drops off over 500 people/hour typically during dining hours, and the on-street parking (~400 spots) is totally mismanaged.
I know Scott, I think he's a good guy, but I also think he's probably susceptible to this same kind of thinking. Maybe he caters extensively to suburbanites who come into the "scary city" on Halloween to get their special tattoos that day? Or more likely he is thinking about his employees, as I have heard him mention that before.
I do think the police are overreacting, and the blanket ban is unnecessary, but that seems to be the way they do things these days.
I remember a day this past year when all street parking on the major streets was banned: the blizzard this past winter. It was difficult to walk, difficult to drive, impossible to park, no T service, and yet the businesses that chose to remain open on Harvard Avenue were all jam-packed with people.
That's your opinion. Small
That's your opinion. Small businesses are struggling as it is. Why would local business owners lie? It's not as if the parking ban is going to be reversed. I would have expected hardcore cycling advocates to be in favor of independent local business...
I just cited hard facts
It's not my opinion that there were many people in businesses on the street even when parking had to be banned due to snow emergency. I saw it. People were there, in large numbers.
I also didn't say that the business owners lie. I said that they massively overestimate the effect of on-street parking, and cited research to back that up.
Your opinion is that a parking ban for one day is somehow going to cause the end of the world for small businesses? I call bullshit on that.
I'm not a hardcore cycling advocate but one reason that cycling advocates are better for independent, local business is because said advocates aren't blowing all their money on car repairs and gas tank filling.
calm down, buttercup!
Cite your sources. You can't just spew 'facts' without citation. Do you actually live in the city? ...I didn't think so.
You can't just spew 'facts'
Says the guy whose sole citation is "Why would they lie?"
Why would they lie is a
Why would they lie is a question not a citation. Stay in school, kiddo.
You're absolutely right.
You didn't actually provide any citation at all.
I can write my own rebuttals
Anono, I already pointed out the misfortune of your comments taking a valid point and making it sound like an ass. And somehow, you got to be the first person to respond. I was too busy to write my own response, but I think I rather take silence than you speaking for me.
As for my own response. Even if most business is by people in the already in walking distance or by the b-line - which I do imagine most of the business are by those modes. I don't think the response should be "Seriously? Go move to the suburbs." It is needless hostility. If he was complaining to a hypothetical B-line shutdown but he was still in the black by neighborhood and car patronizers, would it merit that type of response? It looks to me the response is because is mode affected is cars. Needless. Regardless if he is overestimating or not, lost business is lost business. And I'm sympathetic to that rather than viewing him as another urban destroying suburbanite.
If it he was pushed into the red, it would make him more sympathetic, but that's not required to make a point valid. And even if he was in the red by the loss parking, it doesn't mean the response he should move to the suburbs. I mean let's look at Matalon's business. Let's assume the loss of parking does hurt him. Applying that logic, he should move out into the suburbs. I bet to many people in Allston, would not be pleased by that. Businesses and where it should be have more factors than parking needs.
The 66 bus sucks. And the B
The 66 bus sucks. And the B Line is terrible beyond comprehension.
A friend of mine commutes from Cambridge to Allston. It typically takes an hour door to door to go less than 3 miles. It's even worse late at night, when the 66 runs every 20 to 30 minutes, *if* it's on time. And then there's the ever-popular T closing time.
So how do people from outside walking distance get to the many interesting restaurants, bars, and shops in Allston Village? Many of them drive. Even if you have to park a bit away from your destination, walking 5 to 10 minutes from a parking space is totally worth it, compared to wasting all night on the T.
Personally, I'd bike there if I could. But most people aren't up for the adrenaline rush crossing the Pike on Cambridge Street.
How impressive of you
You have a friend who commutes from Cambridge to Allston. Wow. That makes you an expert.
Oh wait, it doesn't. I am perfectly aware of the state of the "B" branch, the 66 bus and the 57 bus, because I use them all regularly. And so do a large number of other people. One of the reasons why they "suck" is because they are overcrowded. If I may paraphrase Yogi Berra: nobody goes to Allston Village, because the "B", the 66 and the 57 are overcrowded. I wasn't kidding when I said approximately 500 people per hour alight at Harvard Ave, because I actually sat there and counted it one day.
Regarding Cambridge Street, you may not want to bike or walk there, but many people do. And hopefully it will be much improved in the next few years.
Is your friend able-bodied?
If so, 3MPH is a casual stroll. Why does your friend take (and, apparently, complain about) the T when walking would be faster, cheaper, and under most conditions, more pleasant?
seriously
there are no meters and only 1 public lot in allston; there are salons, barbershops, restaurants, drug stores, auto parts and mechanics, skate shops, clothing, music stores and record shops, book stores, magic shops, pet stores, grocery stores, rental car agencies, and hundreds of small restaurants. relocating is idiotic: they opened their businisses there because its a vibrant area. the parking ban for 2 days is totally disruptive because a tremendous amount of business in allston is from driving: its off the pike, storrow drive, comm ave and is a hub between brighton and brookline.. allston isnt kenmore with 30k people in the streets creating a public safety hazard...drunk students having some fun is one thing to keep an eye on and be careful of, but pretty much shutting down one of bostons most vibrant shopping areas during a holiday is excessive, it hurts the businesses and also their employees who earn their money (and tips) from that business.
This is ridiculous
because the kind of people who are going to get rowdy in Allston post-Sox victory over Halloween don't have cars.
I think the city's just trying to reduce the number of people doing street parking so they can push everyone into paid lots, onto the T, or out into other municipalities, so someone else's cops (MBTA, Cambridge, Brookline, Arlington, Newton) can deal with the post-game nonsense.
Parking bans
Actually, as someone else in this thread already mentioned, the parking ban is most likely intended not to keep rowdies out of the neighborhood, but to keep those rowdies from having cars handy to vandalize.
I see
So they will all be conveniently packed into those private lot spaces when the firebug gets going.
(Lived through the Epic police stupidity in the Kenmore area in 1986 ... one told me that there was a "state of emergency" and then hung up on me when I laughed and I called out his lie. Then I called MIT and let them know who I talked to and how the cops weren't letting people get home after evening classes ...ESCAPE IS FUTILE! Sigh.)
The goal is to not have any
The goal is to not have any cars out there to get vandalized after the win - or having a drunk driver speed off and hit equally drunk pedestrians (like what happened after a Patriots win a few years ago). And to allow the Patrick wagons easy access to areas they're needed in.
I do think they're going overboard though - banning parking from a small sliver of Brighton Ave - from the White Hat Tavern down to Tavern on the Square - is probably sufficient. And starting at 4pm? If there's any tomfoolery, it won't happen til after 11pm when the Sox win. A 10pm-2am parking ban for a small area within a block of the Harvard/Brighton Ave intersection would be plenty sufficient.
Wait, people still call it the White Hat?
Jeez, that's a chestnut. And a 4 PM parking ban is asinine. You can always count on Boston's public officials for displays of ignorance and sloth.
Maybe the parking ban is at
Maybe the parking ban is at 4pm so that people don't have time to drive in, park, and get drunk before the parking ban kicks in at 11. Did that ever occur to you?
Why are you so upset that
Why are you so upset that people drive cars, trucks and/or motorcycles? Is it about parking that bothers you the most or just the fact that individuals drive motorized vehicles? Are you opposed to people riding on a bus? Is that okay? Frequently a bus has to pull over to pick people up at a bus stop. Does that offend you?
Do you talk to yourself a lot
Do you talk to yourself a lot on the T?
Are you okay?
Are you okay?
Well you want to be sure the
Well you want to be sure the tow truck drivers can clock out before the game, right?
They'll drink and drive anyway
Parking around Allston is actually quite easy even when you strip two blocks of Brighton Ave. What do you know about Allston?
I know a little bit about
I know a little bit about Allston, kid.
You are talking about the
You are talking about the same people that can't be bothered to put in parking meters, enforce 2hour parking in Allston/Brighton, or heavily punish illegal parking on game days. Pissing away revenue and making it even harder for business patrons and local residents to park since jerks (HELLO BROOKLINE OVERNIGHTERS) use Allston for a parking lot.
Yeah, I definitely side with the overnighters on that argument
(Expletive) Brookline.
I will never understand why
I will never understand why Boston allows Brookline to dump their resident's parking load on our city streets at night.
Exactly
Put up a tollbooth. $5 to cross into Boston on Harvard St. if you don't have a city resident sticker. Why doesn't Boston retaliate against Brookline for their nonsense? When did Boston stop wearing the pants of the two?
Me neither
For example, one of the closest streets to Brookline is Brainerd Road and it is left as completely unregulated parking near Harvard Ave.
People love to whine about parking but they won't even do the cheap, minimal, most basic step of signing Brainerd Road as resident-permit only.
Instead they insist that new housing must add millions of dollars to its construction pricetag in order to supply a ridiculous 2 parking spaces per unit (lately that's been talked down to 1 in some places).
It's pure irresponsibility.
There's plenty of parking
There's plenty of parking enforcement in Allston, including the non-metered two hour spots. Sure, you might get away with parking longer than 2 hours sometimes, but parking there all day is pretty much a guaranteed ticket. There's more metered parking than there's demand for along Commonwealth Ave. The problem with Allston is that there are ZERO pay lots or garages. Tired of hunting for a street spot and want to just pay $20 for a lot? Too bad, you're out of luck, because there aren't any.
More parking rules are not the answer. Case in point - just look at Sundays, when most parking restrictions aren't enforced, and everyone can still find a space.
Also, the city has a pretty good racket going by having much of the street sweeping begin at midnight on Allston's commercial streets - they're ticketing and towing cars when there's peak demand for the spaces, which makes things even worse. People are used to street sweeping happening either a) early morning or b) late overnight hours... not midnight. Couple that with the fact that many of the signs are missing, faded, or defaced.
Don't get me started on those meters
Absolutely no excuse for those to exist. None. Those can't possibly make any money. Who on Earth would pay for a meter between Packard's Corner and Allston St. during meter hours?
Sense does not enter into it
I watch it all the time. The meters go mostly empty until 6 p.m. when they shut off, and then people start parking in the spaces. Total mismanagement on the part of BTD. But you knew that already.
People love to complain about parking (it's the national pastime), but for the most part, I see ample number of parking spaces in Allston go empty, even in the free zone, most of the time when I'm walking around. The only time there seems to be any kind of "crunch" is peak dinner hours, like 6-9 p.m. on a Friday, right after BTD ends enforcement of meters (they still do 2-hour parking though).
The smart thing for BTD to do would be to actually apply a local, context-appropriate solution to managing on-street parking, instead of a blanket nearly city-wide policy which is one-size-fits-none (yeah yeah, the Back Bay meters go to 8 p.m. big whoop).
For example, they should look at the times of peak demand, and adjust meter hours and rates to match. That means the parking meters ought to run from 6 p.m. to 12 a.m.* only, and be priced to encourage turnover every 2 hours or so. Or better yet, have an occupancy target: aim for the price which results in about 85% block occupancy, which means there ought to be at least one free parking space on any given block at any given time (see Donald Shoup's research).
*Perhaps institute a policy which encourages potential drunk drivers to leave their cars behind overnight. Austin, TX does this using several programs, such as ticket forgiveness, prepaid meters, integration with the late night bus system (yes, even Austin has late night transit, ugh).
Whoa Whoa Whoa Whoa Whoa
People! This is why the rest of the nation thinks everyone from Boston is mildly retahded. Between the fundamentalism of Red Sox religion, and these empty comments from people who somehow think that Allston parking is ample and unnecessary (and that the MBTA is magical, or that it's a lovely, comfortable walk in the park or bike ride from Cambridge to Allston....) well, y'all just provin them right.
The contempt for anyone who
The contempt for anyone who doesn't worship a bicycle is disproportionately high on uhub. It's like a cult. Furthermore, many of them are hypocritical car owners who don't even live in the city. They could care less about small business owners in Allston/Brighton yet don't hesitate to cast judgement on their business practices.
Translation
"I don't have any real arguments to make, so I'll just sling some generalizations around and never explain why I'm here if it's such a fetid nest of NOT ME".
Or something.