Hey, there! Log in / Register

Explosive charges against Boston police officer

The Globe reports Plymouth police have charged a BPD officer with stealing "military-grade explosives" and storing them outside the house he used to share with his estranged wife.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

He'll be back on the job, with back pay and interest. I have a crystal ball.
Patricians, politicians, and police are subject to a different criminal justice system than the rest of us.

up
Voting closed 0

Patricians, police, and politicians ...
Have force to thank for their positions ...
Always scream for your submission ...
and no one's jamming their transmission.

up
Voting closed 0

If the estranged wife of a regular citizen reported plastic and high velocity explosives, the guy would be charged with having bomb making materials and labeled a terrorist. Rather than suspension WITH PAY, the guy would have high or no bail. The dumb kid who joked on Facebook about blowing up a school has been sitting in jail for many months waiting for trial. He had no explosives in his possession, not even NH fireworks, no plans, and no specific target. A cop who could kill and maim many more people with his high explosives than the Marathon bombers with gunpowder instead gets paid leave. With stiff penalties for unlicensed handguns, unlicensed explosives are being treated lightly - somebody could have easily stole them even if the cop wasn't a risk. Meanwhile sale and possession of even firecrackers and bottle rockets are illegal in Mass.

As to danger, the confiscated explosives are pretty stable, needing an explosive blasting cap to trigger, so no need for evacuating the neighborhood.

up
Voting closed 0

With 11 counts that could amount up to 210 years in prison. Seeing that there is some doubt that they are even his (he has son on active duty), it we be unwise for any civil service/union employer to suspend anyone without pay before proving in court this person is guilty.

The kid on facebook actually threatend someone, different than possessing dangerous items. That is common with firearms as well.

up
Voting closed 0

Did the estranged wife, with an axe to grind no doubt, or anyone else see Officer Merricks put the explosives there? About once a month, we read about homeowners finding military grade explosives (Vietnam, WW II souvenirs) that were left in a home or shed by a military veteran who has since moved or passed away. How do we know this isn't the case here? The "explosives" were apparently so docile that neighbors weren't even asked to evacuate. The current BPD regime (who apparently called Plymouth PD after the estranged wife called BPD) has a history of rushing to (bad) judgment, particularly with officers of color like Kirk Merricks, see Officer David Williams. Innocent until proven guilty, except for cops.

up
Voting closed 0

Auntie Zeituni Onyango must have planted those explosives!

Because cops NEVER do stupid/criminal things, especially not in the company of estranged spouses.

Perhaps you should just let the courts do their job?

up
Voting closed 0

Let the courts do their job? Exactly, that's why I noted innocent etc., mysteriously doesn't appear on UH when a cop is charged.

As for:

Auntie Zeituni Onyango must have planted those explosives!

You mean Obama's aunt who defied the deportation order? Nah, that would require work, which she is apparently allergic to. Still recall what she told Ch. 4's Jonathan Elias when questioned about her welfare and public housing benefits while jumping ahead of thousands of impoverished Americans on the waiting list.

“I didn’t take any advantage of the system. The system took advantage of me. I didn’t ask for it; they gave it to me. Ask your system. I didn’t create it or vote for it. Go and ask your system.” -- Auntie Zeituni Onyango

up
Voting closed 0

Adam is suppressing this officer of the law's RIGHTS! How dare Adam be so bold! Next we'll be indefinitely detaining jaywalkers!

...or maybe he just forgot. There's been a lot of stories posted for just one morning... chill...

up
Voting closed 0

I know it's a fine distinction, but I don't use "Innocent, etc." when I don't name the suspect. Yes, this gentleman deserves all of his constitutional rights. Happier?

Yes, BPD sometimes gets a bit carried away with the explosives stuff - I remember that one guy BPD originally said was packing serious munitions in his trunk when their own photo showed it was a flare launcher (not something you'd want to get hit with, but still).

But sometimes Boston cops do do bad things. When I go shopping at the Hyde Park Shaw's, I always pass the garage where Kiko Pulido ran his after-hours club.

Nice to see you sticking up for minority officers. Interesting you mention Williams specifically, since the first time he was fired, I'm sure you're aware, was over the Michael Cox beating - for which only one cop ever went to trial, and that was, of course, Kevin Conley, who wasn't even part of the beating but was the only cop stupid enough to tell the truth in his report.

up
Voting closed 0

I don't use "Innocent, etc." when I don't name the suspect.

The Globe story that you link to names Officer Kirk Merricks in the first line. A distinction without a difference?

I'm not assuming a conspiracy theory. I'm also not assuming that the story, as spoon-fed to the media, is true. I've been around too long to see press releases that bear little resemblance to what actually happened at the scene, especially when the administration is writing the press release about an officer they will likely attempt to discipline. Luckily, as in both attempts to fire Dave Williams, Schroeder Plaza doesn't have the last word.

Very familiar with the Cox case. I believe justice eventually prevailed and the correct officer lost his job for good. I'm happy Kenny Conley was cleared and restored, although he may have had second thoughts on returning to police work after nearly being shot in Watertown the night the Islamic terrorists were running rampant. That's a part of the Watertown story that was under reported. As for defending minority officers, nothing new. We all bleed blue.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm not the Globe; you'd have to ask them about their editorial policies.

"We all bleed blue." No doubt true for the vast majority of officers - it was amazing to see all the MIT officers just standing outside the courthouse the other day. But based on my readings of the issues of the BPPA newsletter before they took them all down, I'd have my doubts that all BPPA union officials feel the same. But, hey, maybe after all the ranting, they've changed. Anything's possible.

I do agree with you that more facts are a good thing and that it's too early to say how this all will play out based on PR comments.

up
Voting closed 0

Just another noble policeman with a supply of docile explosives. Nothing to see here.

up
Voting closed 0

anon 2:46 pm, you're essentially correct with all three of your points, despite the sarcasm. Officer Merricks is a noble Boston cop who also served his country in Desert Storm and Desert Shield.

The explosives are docile as evidenced by video of officers in garden variety raid jackets, not bomb squad gear, carrying the evidence in Home Depot style Rubbermaid bins. Neighbors are told no need to evacuate. Had this been a real explosives emergency, we'd have seen the bomb squad in protective suits, robots etc. Seems like these were merely something akin to large fireworks "found" a week after July 4th and shortly after the son of the estranged wife was home from the military.

Nothing to see here? Seems like the judge agreed, setting a token $1000 bail.

Well, at least one of the politically wired new academy graduates will be able to avoid Roxbury/Mattapan and slip into Merrick's coveted A-1 (Downtown, North End) slot while Merricks goes through the BPD's disciplinary spin cycle, then drips dry.

up
Voting closed 0

You mean STOLEN docile explosives.

You forgot that part. The STOLEN part.

up
Voting closed 0

Because there is no victim. So legally they aren't stolen.

up
Voting closed 0

Which are very dangerous.

I think that there was some doubt as to who actually stored them there (appears to be a son on active duty with access to this material), makes it more likely that someone else might be responsible? As as we have seen, when officers get fired and it turns out a judge or jury or mediator says that officer is not guilty, the City loses a lot of money....

up
Voting closed 0