Hey, there! Log in / Register

Globe trims local coverage

The Boston Business Journal reports the Globe has let go half of the dozen correspondents who write for its Your Town Web sites.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

There goes the only reason lest to buy the globe.

up
Voting closed 0

We only get the Sunday Globe and would ditch that too if it weren't for the coupons.

up
Voting closed 0

Thank goodness the city has so many respectable choices like the Herald.

up
Voting closed 0

Just the YourTown websites, not the paper.

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, journalism helps circulation, which supports ad sales, but other factors are at work here. Instead of reading the newspaper on the bus or train, so many are playing with cell and especially phones. People, generally rather do something else than read a newspaper. For old cranks like me, writing comments online take much less time than emailing letters to the editor, with more immediate feedback!

I used to support pre-press software and had newspapers for customers. Car ads were a major source of revenue for papers and the graphics had to come out right. Want to support journalism, buy more cars! Sunday's Help Wanted section was another cash cow, now gone.

Your Town, Wicked Local, and Patch coverage has all been spotty, depending on the neighborhood. Wicked Local screwed up on its new comments, Patch screwed up with too many non-new items and open house stories, and Your Town seems to have few stories and reporters not going after them.

Any journalists want to do a story on how the main cemetery in a town is getting used as a parking lot and the cemetery commission doesn't care? How many readers outside Arlington would care enough to be worth the print inches?

up
Voting closed 0

I read Universal Hub for specific town news. I just read local papers if I want more info (i.e. MetroWest Times, Chelsea Record, Somerville News, etc)

up
Voting closed 0

What do you read the Globe for at all?

up
Voting closed 0

I do read it for other reasons.. I'm a big Inside Track person. Ooops sorry that's the herald. Oh wait, I like reading about happenings on a Friday around the city.. oh wait, that's the Metro. OH I know, I like to keep up with GLBT news.. oh wait that's Boston Spirit.

Gee there really isn't any real need to read the Globe anymore.

up
Voting closed 0

And it pains me to say that but really...I can't think of a reason.

up
Voting closed 0

I, for one, read the Globe to see the insightful, intelligent, not-at-all stupid columns by one Dan Shaughnessy. He is a master of the English language, and provides amazing in-depth coverage of our local sports teams. I come away from his columns invigorated and nowhere close to feeling like a Faneuil Hall-area bar urinal! He is a treasure!

up
Voting closed 0

...the people who've voted that comment up did so because they got the sarcastic irony!

up
Voting closed 0

It's telling that the hyperlocal outlet that is connected to many of those local papers, Wicked Local, still seems to provide decent coverage. Patch is pretty much shot and we'll see what happens with the "Your Town" coverage. If they go the route of someone who never visits a particular town just pumps out announcements from the city's events calendar and press releases received from local groups, then we know its days are numbuhed.

up
Voting closed 0

Wicked Local's coverage for the towns around Boston may still be good, but the Allston-Brighton Tab has become a complete waste of time, at least in its online incarnation.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm not holding my breath. Gatehouse media owns Wicked Local & they just went bankrupt. I'm not convinced that some of those smaller papers survive the restructuring in any recognizable way.

up
Voting closed 0

The Globe has hired three additional photographers, to follow Linda Pizzuti around and take constant photos, so her picture can appear three times a day in the paper and on its web site....

up
Voting closed 0

... and Gisele?

up
Voting closed 0

Globe North, South and West? (I like the online paper -- as it has all these extra sections).

up
Voting closed 0

I read the Globe to see Bill Brett's party photos. Rock on, Bill Brett!

up
Voting closed 0

You would like to live in a city where the only daily newspaper was the Herald? And you got your local news from Patch and Wicked Local? Or the daily body counts from the TV stations? We could be like Birmingham, Alabama where the newspaper comes out 3 times a week. Or Montreal where the sports section is 3 pages a day. I'm sorry these people lost their jobs but they didn't even write for the newspaper, so when you say "there goes the only reason to read the Globe," you clearly don't read it anyway. Enjoy your blogs.

up
Voting closed 0

Why are we nasty?

The Globe's "journalism" has gone into the shitter lately. Read some articles some days.. lacking crucial information about whatever is being written, spelling and grammar errors, poor reporting, slanted articles... I could really go on and on and on and on.

The days of big newspapers are over.. the internet is where it's at and that isn't going to change.

Look I'm not thrilled that people are out of work, but seriously, we've known for years that Globe's future is circling the drain.

Not saying the Herald is any better or worse.. (and in some respects it is identical to the globe's fate).

PS - If you're so pro Globe and anti blogs, why are you here anyways?

up
Voting closed 0

I like blogs...Universal Hub is one of many I read every day. But I'm pretty sure Adam would agree that if the Globe disappeared it would be a big loss to Boston, the whole region, and for that matter to UHub.

Personally I think the Globe has improved since Brian McGrory became editor, but I've always liked reading it and I hope they find a way to continue whether on the printed page or digitally.

up
Voting closed 0

I agree. We still need some powerhouse reporting, from a paper that can afford to take time w/ a story, consult w/ experts, do legwork outside of the immediate region, etc.

up
Voting closed 0

Look. WE didn't decide to start slashing neighborhood coverage. We didn't invent the Internet or decide that Boston.com should be pretty much a 24/7 shill for Dunkin' Donuts and a rotating series of people's Halloween pet photos. I grew up on the Globe. I would love it to feel like a relevant, vital part of my daily news-seeking. But 21st century media transformation aside, I feel like it's just getting weaker and less compelling every time I pick it up. I don't get the sense when I read stories about the city that the reporters have any clue what they're talking about--it's like they're all calling it in from Wellesley or Hingham. I loathe the Herald but at least they feel slightly connected to the average joe sitting on the Orange Line. Anyway--no ones condemning it across the board. There's still good journalism going on there and obviously all urban papers face these kinds of challenges. But I do wish earnestly that I cared more or felt more compelled to seek it out and most of the time I just don't.

up
Voting closed 0

while she was attacking Romney for being clueless about the illegals working on his Belmont lawn, she had illegal Brazilians she KNEW were undocumented working on HER lawn. The hypocrisy was stunning. That, and the whole preaching about LGBTQ issues thing. If you want to concentrate on a minority of the population, fine. But don't whine afterwards about the mathematical implications of your decisions on your revenue. Not everyone aspires to be a hipster.

up
Voting closed 0

Was she campaigning for public office on a get-tough-on-illegal-immigration platform? If not, then I think your accusation of hypocrisy is overblown.

up
Voting closed 0