Hey, there! Log in / Register

Nothing like a little warning: Boston school-bus drivers walk off the job

Boston Police cruisers and community-center vans were pressed into service as impromptu school buses when school-bus drivers struck this morning over proposed work-rule changes - including a new bus tracker for parents.

BPS says the strike by United Steelworkers of America Local 8751 caught it unawares:

Because of this, students will not be marked late and absences will be marked as “excused” in the Boston Public Schools during the disruption.

More from BPS.

As the morning unfolded, police held overnight officers on the job. At first, officers were directed to cruise bus stops to tell parents and children no buses would come, but that quickly changed to a shuttle service - officers across the city ferried groups of two and three students at a time to their schools.

Now the question is: How will the kids get home in the afternoon?

City Councilor and mayoral candidate John Connolly was agahst:

It is shameful for the school bus drivers union to use our children as pawns in a political game. This is about safety first and foremost, and it is totally unacceptable that our children were put at risk this morning, not to mention the impact on thousands of parents who will miss work. Missing even one day of school is a real problem for our children who face a daunting achievement gap.

State Rep. and fellow candidate Marty Walsh was equally appalled:

Kids and parents must come first. This is wrong. The bus drivers have put our children in harm’s way. This is an illegal action, causing a huge disruption, and I call on the bus drivers to return to work immediately. This is a violation of the contract and cannot be tolerated.

This is the first fall BPS buses are being run by Veolia Transportation, after a rocky relationship between BPS and its previous bus operator.

Neighborhoods: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I just got the call. I have an idea....lets stop bussing students from one end of the city to the other! Then we won't have underpaid bus drivers to worry about. Less traffic, kids might actually go to school with their neighbors. Right. Too many pros for this to be a good idea.

up
Voting closed 0

I agree with everything except for the "underpaid" part.

up
Voting closed 0

I agree. Those poor kids should stay where they belong. We wouldn't want kids mixing with those from other scary neighborhoods.

up
Voting closed 0

Kids from for affluent area dont go to BPS!

up
Voting closed 0

I live in a scary neighborhood with poor people. And I still think that investing the money in schools and teachers will go a lot farther than holding a lottery so that the poor kids still end up in the bad schools when their parents can't afford private school.

up
Voting closed 0

How much better it is for the poor kids to go to school with other poor kids across the city?

We call that Choice.

up
Voting closed 0

The race issue via a vis neighborhood schools is pretty much dead, with a school system that's what? 90+ % minority? I haven't seen any evidence that busing kids from Eastie to Brighton or Roxbury to Allston has leveled the playing field in any way. The schools are still segregated in terms of achievement and opportunity (take a look at any elementary school that has Advanced Work classes or the exam schools). IMHO the money spent on busing would be much better spent focusing on equalizing quality and opportunity in neighborhood schools. Not to mention you might end up with schools that are much more connected to communities and families than they are now (just try getting to a school meeting or even a school play when you live near Dudley and work in the medical area and your kid goes to school in Charlestown...)

up
Voting closed 0

Let's spend $100M+ a year to bus those poor kids to distant schools full of other equally poor kids, makes perfect sense. Something tells me you either don't have kids, or they don't attend BPS.

up
Voting closed 0

I don't know exactly what percentage of busing costs is due to the current zone system, but it is well south of $100 million. BPS has to provide school busing for both parochial and charter schools in Boston - and both those are out of BPS control and open citywide. Ditto for the high-school students that have to take school buses rather than the T (for example, kids from Charlestown who go to BLS or BLA). And double ditto for special-needs kids. These costs would remain even if we went 100% back to neighborhood elementary schools.

Distant schools? How big do you think Boston really is? I'm not arguing there aren't inefficiencies in the system, but we're not talking 30-mile trips here.

up
Voting closed 0

On at least a couple of occasions. Probably changes a little based on the cost mix but 50% plus or minus is probably not far off (my guess would be on the plus side).

up
Voting closed 0

At least if you believe the figures published by BPS. They list their total transportation budget as $80,015,828, and their "controlled choice transport" budget as $32,989,391. To see the breakdown, go to the FY2014 Budget, click on "FY14 Preliminary Budget by Account code summary", then look at the "Gen. Fund Acct Detail" tab in the spreadsheet.

up
Voting closed 0

A cool $33 mil to keep BPS uniformly crappy, not bad at all. Also, let's not think about all the money that could be saved on schools in non-problematic neighborhoods that wouldn't require an army of social workers and security guards, which in turn could be spent to improve problem schools and ensure the kids there are actually getting decent education. All in the name of political correctness.

up
Voting closed 0

claims $70 million for transportation costs and predicts costs of $100 million plus over the next few years. No idea how much of that is for, say, special needs buses, or the parochial/private school buses (can someone explain that one to me?) but it's a pretty colossal number.

up
Voting closed 0

I don't know the West Zone as well as the North zone where we were for most of elementary school but the geography involved there is significantly more insane, especially when you figure in the complications of getting in and out if say East Boston or Charlestown. 45 minutes each way on the bus was definitely not uncommon.

up
Voting closed 0

Or even better idea. Have the students use the MBTA.

up
Voting closed 0

But you want a bunch of first graders on the MBTA?

up
Voting closed 0

let's see.

- An app that tells parents where the bus is
- More Safety Requirements
- Better on time performance

So what's the issue. Sounds like the Bus Driver's Union has something to hide, or they just want to continue crappy, unsafe service.

up
Voting closed 0

Maybe the custodians who were so passionate about their union rights last week can explain why we need to have 'steelworkers' driving our kids buses and why accountability is so bad.

up
Voting closed 0

I thought that was a little odd too. But maybe because a bus is made out of steel?

up
Voting closed 0

Teachers unions piggyback onto other groups to be able to get into the national groups. I think my mother's union is part of the electricians

up
Voting closed 0

I understand where unions were important back in the day with no oversight by independent agencies - but today it just seems like unions hold employers hostage for unreasonable demands.

Kindof like Congress, actually...

up
Voting closed 0

And get back to us on that, mmmkay?

up
Voting closed 0

I'm all for better wages, safer working conditions, and access to health insurance without going broke. I just think these things can be done universally for all workers and not just the unionized ones.

I'm currently in a union. I'm not entirely sure what my dues go to every week, except to provide a bargaining position for cost of living increases. Yes, those are nice - I also know that for the first year I worked I was without a contract because it took the union three years to negotiate a contract, and the sticking points were really quite minor (from my perspective). So my positions on unions might be a little jaded, purely because I am not a fan of mine.

up
Voting closed 0

Really the same question. Corporations and governments are organized employers, why shouldn't labor organize too? Seems to be a fair point.

All three are in sore need of being re-democratized, however ...

If you are getting any COLA these days, you are doing well. I understand the jadedness, but have you considered running for a union office? That's one way the workers take the situation back.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm all for better wages, safer working conditions, and access to health insurance without going broke. I just think these things can be done universally for all workers and not just the unionized ones.

Yes, I'm sure all employers will just start offering these benefits out of the goodness of their hearts, without all that messy unionization and nasty government regulation.

up
Voting closed 0

The way it often works in the private sector is employers offer better wages and benefits to attract and retain quality workers.

up
Voting closed 0

The way it often works in the private sector is employers offer better wages and benefits to attract and retain quality workers.

Yeah, my local Wal-Mart workers were just saying that the other day.

up
Voting closed 0

I didn't know that Walmart was seeking to be known as having quality workers. They want to offer you something cheap and make a profit off your desire for cheap goods. Therefore, they do not need to retain stellar staff since its irrelevant to you, the consumer. You get what you pay for at Walmart; shitty pay, shitty service. Meanwhile, a company which seeks a higher quality experience and higher quality product for those of you willing to spend more and get quality products, will actually be a little more decent.

Behold, the mysteries of the universe, too difficult to grasp.

up
Voting closed 0

Never go to them , at all , at all . I will go elsewhere and pay more.

up
Voting closed 0

If you live in Boston it's pretty hard to get to a Walmart. Politicians around here think they have the right to make that decision for us.

I happily shop in Target in South Bay and Kmart before that - I fail to see the difference between them and WalMart other than WalMart is a bigger Target.

up
Voting closed 0

Target gives a rats ass about employees. WalMart does not.

Did you know most WalMart employees qualify for food stamps? Did you know that Target employees do not?

Did you also know that WalMart is full of cheap chinese crap, Target not so much.

up
Voting closed 0

Here's one article that disputes your claim and seems to be backed with good data unless they just made it up. Appears what differences they have are marginal - and higher bonuses at WalMart for managers for example explains some of the difference. I would venture a guess that Target also tends to be more prevalent in high cost urban areas - possibly accounting for some of the pay discrepancies.

http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2011/05/02/target-vs-...

As for cheap Chinese crap - as a frequent Target shopper and sometimes Walmart - I'd say they are both filled with cheap Chinese crap outside of the grocery aisles.

I saw at least one other article saying pretty much the same thing - but I thought the AOL Jobs article would have more credibility as a neutral source.

If you google "does Target pay better than WalMart" it's been searched enough that you don't have to even finish typing it.

Based on the couple of articles I saw, it's more about a cultivated image than reality.

up
Voting closed 0

Sears Ace Hardware JC Penney Target Kohl's , online and pay UPS to bring it. Just get in a groove and work with it!

up
Voting closed 0

Seriously how many Wal-Mart employees live in Boston? I'm guessing it is a very, very small number. Wal-Mart is terrible, but it is mostly terrible for rural America, not urban America.

Do you live in Boston?

up
Voting closed 0

I've worked for large employers that provided good benefits to all their workers.

I also have some faith in healthcare reform, and on minimum wage increases. I'm young and naive and the system hasn't broken me into a shell of my former self yet.

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, all employers are evil. That's exactly what I said. :facepalm:

up
Voting closed 0

Employers are not necessarily evil, but when your reason for being is to make money - and let's face it no matter what their "mission" is, most companies exist to make money - then companies who squeeze the most out of their employees will make more money and be more successful.
There will always be responsible companies who pay more than the minimum and offer generous benefits, but they are few and far between.

up
Voting closed 0

...for whatever reason. I go to a packie a lot, in the suburbs and they are so understaffed the day guy has to put a bell at the cash register with a sign that says, "Ring for Service" They also have a 'help wanted' sign at the desk.

Eight bucks an hour. So, ring for service...

up
Voting closed 0

Anyone that has a package store and pays minimum wage could find themselves having silent partners.

up
Voting closed 0

Shouldn't pay above market rate just because their workers want more money. Maybe we should unionize all deskilled labor.

up
Voting closed 0

Maybe we should. I have no problem with paying people a living wage and providing health insurance.

up
Voting closed 0

Define market rate. You mean, the wages offered by large corporations - how is that working out for full-time workers right now?

Unions are simply incorporations of labor. Capital gets to be incorporated and organized to suppress wages ... labor should be allowed to incorporate and organize to increase them.

Oh, wait - you probably think the market sets prices, too.

up
Voting closed 0

Why can't what the workers want to be paid be apart of the equation market rate?

up
Voting closed 0

Still understand the essential purpose and importance of unions. But many of us are still stuck shaking our heads when modern unions seem to go out if their way to act like bullying, whiny a-holes over issues that just seem petty and greedy--i.e. the ridiculous kerfuffle last week with Insomnia Cookies, the continuous hijinks of the teachers' union, and now something like this. We all get the right to strike over unsafe working conditions or unfairness but GPS on the bus? Huh?

up
Voting closed 0

I believe it was WBZ TV that reported that the school system knew this was going to happen and did not bother to let parents know so that they could make arrangements.

up
Voting closed 0

What is lost in all of these comments about the merits of labor unions is that what the union has done here is exceedingly foolish.

No matter how you feel about unionized labor, no one is happy about kids being put in a less safe situation, parents having to miss days of work, police resources being diverted from where they should otherwise be deployed, and totally screwing up traffic all over town and in many of the near suburbs.

The union has managed to get everyone pissed off at it - how this can possibly work to the benefit of its members?

There are still lots and lots of people, particularly lower-skilled people, looking for work. I'd be pretty worried if I were a rank and file member that didn't show up today.

up
Voting closed 0

it was a "wildcat" strike, not supported by the union leadership. It also says that:

'When union president Dumond Louis, addressing the workers through a bullhorn, asked the workers to go back to work this afternoon, he was greeted with boos and shouts of “No!” '

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/blogs/the-race...

up
Voting closed 0

The union leadership has to say that otherwise, they'd find themselves without a job and the union would be sued in no time .

up
Voting closed 0

Hey, the crime rate went down last quarter, let's get rid of the entire Police Department. Obviously, they're not needed anymore.

up
Voting closed 0

To the union type, smaller ones often need help to have enough bargaining power and expertise. They align with larger, older ones.

Years ago, I worked a semester and summer at Cain's Mayonnaise when it was next to MIT. I had to join the union there, Bakers and Confectioners, which was part of the Teamsters. Likewise, for awhile the National Writers Union, to which I belonged, became part of the United Autoworkers. In the latter case, that also provided a path to affordable health care freelance writers couldn't get otherwise.

Unless you believe in the kindness of strangers business owners, despite massive evidence otherwise, unions are still essential to many.

up
Voting closed 0

I think the City of Detroit would have a thing or two to say about the UAW, among others who have bankrupted them and driven much of the industry down south. In the end healthcare being a reason to join a union seems like a different argument entirely, not that this won't potentially stay the case depending on whether the unions ultimately get the preferential treatment from the ACA they are seeking.

As for the "kindness of business owners" evidence to the contrary you speak like unions are saints. Business owners have to deal with no small amount of expenses just to operate, and to qualify the majority of businesses in the country (which are small-medium sized) by the behavior of a few bad eggs I would say is grossly unfair to the role they play in society.

up
Voting closed 0

Unions are like companies that are constantly merging and re-forming so the names have little relevance to what the workers do now. (They do this for cost savings and for additional clout.) It is likely that the bus-drivers union way back when merged with another union which then merged with the Steelworkers union giving bus drivers a somewhat absurd union name.

I know this as I used to be part of the United Autoworkers. My job couldn't be further from making cars....

I like the idea of union in theory but I've been in too many unions that were far more concerned with protecting lazy employees and this has taught me they often do more harm then good.

up
Voting closed 0

If the drivers aren't doing anything wrong, then they really have nothing to worry about - I think there might be some confusion as to whether or not they're being FORCED to improve performance without consideration of factors beyond their control. If it had been made clear that it's primarily about figuring out why buses are late and using this data to make route and timing adjustments, then it makes you really wonder if they're hiding bad behavior.

up
Voting closed 0

I think it's more probably that those are not the issues at all and it's the Boston Public Schools that have something to hide.

Make bus drivers overworked and underpaid, and when they protest against that, just argue they are opposing "better on-time performance". That sure as hell works to make the media oppose any strike ever.

up
Voting closed 0

Replace these over paid union hacks.

up
Voting closed 0

Because I see them parking their goddamned buses outside of their brownstones in Back Bay all the friggin' time! How am I supposed to get to Sonsie for dinner when they're taking all the valet spaces with those things, amirite??

up
Voting closed 0

If pay is the issue then let's make that the issue. Or working conditions or whatever. But this is not a high-bar job. You have to be a good, safe driver, be reasonably personable, but no other real skills are required. I'm betting that this is a pretty decent gig, pay and benefits-wise.

up
Voting closed 0

... as long as they're being paid adequately for all those extra certifications. I'd love to hear the other side.

up
Voting closed 0

So 600 bus drivers oppose measures to improve performance and driver safety- I mean, who wants to be pressured in to doing a better job at work- and they inconvenience thousands of BPS schoolkids and parents who are either late to work or have call out. Have to imagine many BPS parents are paid hourly, have limited sick time, etc. So unbelievably selfish... I consider myself a fairly liberal guy, but this is totally gutless by the steelworkers union. Disgusting.

Heads at the BPS also need to roll- they knew this could happen but didn't say a word. Inexcusable.

up
Voting closed 0

"This would never happen if I were mayor, because I'm so good at union negotiation."

up
Voting closed 0

Nope, he went with this:

"Kids and parents must come first. This is wrong. The bus drivers have put our children in harm’s way. This is an illegal action, causing a huge disruption, and I call on the bus drivers to return to work immediately. This is a violation of the contract and cannot be tolerated."

up
Voting closed 0

He was raised and bread by two political hacks. How many check do you think get cut to the Connolly family every month?

up
Voting closed 0

Walsh outhacks him by miles!! How do you figure?

up
Voting closed 0

No, Google, I am not in the market for welding, steel, etc...

up
Voting closed 0

Perhaps we should wait to hear from the union before deciding that they have no reason to do what they did. The school dept. put out its story, is it possible that they might be less than totally honest.t4

up
Voting closed 0

The lack of notice is still inexcusable and a safety hazard. It would be nice if the union actually spoke up and told us their reasons. It would have been ever better if they had done so before striking instead of waiting until after. Striking should be a last resort.

up
Voting closed 0

I can't believe I have to write a manual for union negotiation, but:

A. Negotiate.

B. threaten strike.

C. GO PUBLIC with threat of strike, so BPS and parent constituencies can put pressure on the bus company to fix it quick.

D. Strike.

Step C was pretty important to a bunch of little kids standing at the bus stop waiting for officers on overtime to give them their first rides on the wrong side of the wire mesh!

up
Voting closed 0

C and a half: Announce the date/time of your strike so preparations can be made to work around your strike.

For example, when the Boston Teachers' Union planned a strike in February 2007, they took the vote and made it known two weeks in advance. The schools could then plan to be closed that day so that they didn't have a problem of where to herd the kids or how to supervise all of the classrooms, etc. Instead, by striking without warning, the bus drivers left kids standing in the street while parents went to work expecting a normal day for their kids.

up
Voting closed 0

Strawberries!

up
Voting closed 0

The fact that the bus drivers decided to leave parents and kids high and dry, with no warning and no attempt to explain why they were doing this, tells me all I need to know about why these bus drivers should be summarily fired. I think you could even make a case for criminal charges against the union leadership for a conspiracy to endanger children.

up
Voting closed 0

- An app that tells parents where the bus is
- More Safety Requirements
- Better on time performance

Charging drivers with "better on-time performance" while expecting more safety seems like a recipe for disaster.

There are too many variables involved in driving through a city with children and with getting those kids on and off of the bus that holding drivers accountable for "on time performance" seems like it would just create incentives for unsafe passing of other vehicles, running red lights, making unsafe turns, rushing kids on and off buses (not all special needs kids ride the short bus), driving off while kids are still around the bus, etc. Bus drivers are also expected to maintain order on the bus - will a driver bother to pull over and break up a squabble or stop kids from throwing things out the window if it compromises on-time performance?

These things are clearly at odds.

up
Voting closed 0

I don't give any union the benefit of the doubt when they can't even be bothered to tell all involved parties that they have a complaint before resorting to a strike. Parents were completely unaware that the bus drivers were unhappy with the changes. As I've said before, strikes should be a last resort, not a first resort.

up
Voting closed 0

Do you think they "maintain order" now? The buses that pass my house usually look as if they're en route to a riot. A few years ago I had a kid bounce a Granny Smith apple off my head!

up
Voting closed 0

School buses are a zoo - I'll definitely give you that. One of my kids told a friend who asked "aren't you scared being on a (MBTA) bus full of strange adults" that "they just sit around reading - nobody is throwing paper balls or screaming PENIS!"

There are different definitions of "order". Mostly, it is "is this keeping me from driving" and "are the kids harming others". Drivers still pull over and separate students or stop them from throwing things out the windows - for what that is worth. But those stops to break up problems take time.

So drivers are already expected to both drive through the city and keep the kids in line - even if that second part is a matter of opinion. But how in the hell is that ever going to take place - even to the extent that the driver is able to drive - if "on time performance" is now dumped on top of "absurd route schedules", "vagaries of traffic" and "increased safety measures"? This is their strongest talking point right here.

up
Voting closed 0

"The Penis Game" That's awesome...... PENIS!!!!

up
Voting closed 0

Sounds like lots of other cities have managed to balance the safety v. on time issue. Just a couple of years ago there was a big to-do over how a dozen other cities or so implemented new software/programming to improve routing and on-time arrivals and somehow it didn't work in Boston despite what seemed to be more than ample effort.

We are always different. Let's face it - very few school buses are driving through the old cowpaths of downtown. The rest of our city is a lot like most other cities in the country in the Northeast quadrant of the country. How come they are not different but we are?

We do so many other things well - but so many times when it involves unions we seem to fail where others have succeeded despite throwing enormous resources behind an effort. Why is that?

up
Voting closed 0

If "on-time" isn't based on fictional, wishful thinking scheduling to begin with, then it will not be an issue.

The MBTA used to have this problem because the people who built the schedules had no real information on mean and variance of run time. And no frigging clue overall.

My point isn't that on-time performance isn't important - it is simply based on something the driver has no control over (the schedule). Making the driver responsible for being on time is at odds with making the driver responsible for safety. If there is traffic holding up the bus, and the driver will be blamed/down rated for lacking on-time performance, then you create a perverse incentive for pulling away before children are clear of the bus, for running red lights, etc.

up
Voting closed 0

They have what is apparently a fairly sophisticated modeling program that they implemented a couple of years ago. The drivers complained (and lots of kids were late) and they supposedly fixed the problem by tweaking the software - although it sounded like some of the routes just needed a supervisor to ride along on occasion and the problem miraculously fixed itself. I recall quotes that this software (I would hope with reasonable human checks and balances) had been implemented around the country with almost no major problems until Boston decided to use it and the quotes in the paper were thinly veiled jabs at the union workers about being upset over a lot of the unnecessary slack getting taken out of the schedules.

It appears the drivers didn't like being tracked, didn't like getting the fluff taken out of the schedule etc. etc. and today we are paying the price for their hissy fit.

I haven't seen a rash of kids getting dragged under buses, pedestrians getting mowed down by drivers running red lights or daily reports of head ons as school buses careen across the double yellow line to get the kids to school on time.

You know how statistics works as well as I do if not better - this is a pretty simple operational issue - traffic across 180 days and hundreds of buses falls into a statistical distribution and there will certainly be outliers - but day in day out you can predict within a few minutes how long a bus route will take, even in a crowded city. We can't be that different from every other city in the country that doesn't appear to have these issues and I can't imagine for a second that Court Street is legitimately sacrificing safety to get a bus to school 5 minutes earlier. In the scheme of a billion dollar budget and an $80 million busing budget, the added cost would be trivial.

up
Voting closed 0

One of my kids told a friend who asked "aren't you scared being on a (MBTA) bus full of strange adults" that "they just sit around reading - nobody is throwing paper balls or screaming PENIS!"

Oh, I don't know; a bus full of strange adults might very well have someone screaming 'penis,' at least if the adults were sufficiently strange.

Plus there are a few strange MBTA bus and train drivers who like to scream at the passengers -- they have a bit of an edge, given that they've got control of the PA system.

up
Voting closed 0

Someone merely screaming "penis" would be a blessed relief. I saw a tweet recently saying the the 66 really needs one more 6 to reflect the true reality of riding it.

up
Voting closed 0

I saw a tweet recently saying the the 66 really needs one more 6 to reflect the true reality of riding it.

Aw, there's nothing wrong with the 66 bus that couldn't be solved by building a new circumferential subway line from Logan to Sullivan Square along the Grand Junction right of way, then replacing the 86 bus between Sullivan Square to Harvard Square, replacing the 66 bus to Dudley Square, and then to JFK/U.Mass. Better use the same type of rolling stock as the Red Line for economies of scale.

up
Voting closed 0

It's the people on it. For some reason it's just always a freak show on that bus, 24/7.

up
Voting closed 0

There are problems with the route. IIRC, the 66 is the one of the most heavily used bus routes, yet has no help in the form of bus lanes, traffic signal priority, or articulated buses. At the very least it should have larger buses like the Silver Line buses or the 39. Really though, given its good position geographically, it ought to be part of a new circumferential subway line. (Using the entire Grand Junction right of way doesn't work so well in Cambridge -- you wouldn't have a good connection to the Red Line without a detour, and it's a bit too close to the city; Kendall Sq. is just a couple stops out from Park St., and isn't the hub that Harvard Sq. is. Likewise, Harvard Av. in Allston and Coolidge Corner are more useful stops than the BU Bridge, St. Mary's St., or Fenway station on the D-Line.)

up
Voting closed 0

I am not a fan of the busing , from before day one . It has proven to be counter - productive to bettering education , and has diluted the quality of the product, never mind the social upheaval it has caused to the neighborhoods. Having put on the bullseye , This seems to be about the dignity of the worker, and the old deflections ,aka '' the needs of the business " or in this case , the children ,are being used as camouflage to conceal the distorted abuses of the new technologies by the management . No working person wants to give up a days pay foolishly , you never can make it back, especially in this case. Maybe the management should be held accountable, for surely if they were monitored as well as they intend to monitor the bus drivers, there would be a large turnover in those ranks. In the private sector ,I have worked productively for managers that just impeded the process of getting the job done ,with their total basic lack of people skills and also ignorance of the process of that which they were managing. But they were in charge, and could distort and re-arrange reality to hide their lack of responsibilities. All this noise in the media today , the people are just inconvenienced and angry, and the management is holding out the old "for the children " deflection. Maybe they should have not distorted the GPS and start treating the help like they would like to be treated. All workers deserve to be treated with dignity ,no matter what their station in life is. That seems to be the issue here, and if those people walked off the job ,there must be radical abuses going on. No one wants to give up a days pay just because they got their feathers ruffled .

up
Voting closed 0

GPS provides accountability and allows management to see where and when a driver was. If a driver is doing their job why would they be so worried about that?

up
Voting closed 0

When they are maybe being micro-managed? Perhaps as if , why did you go down that street instead of the one you should have. Answer is oil truck making delivery , had to detour. Multiply that by how many times you might have to adapt and overcome the reality of the three dimensional real world , as opposed to the one dimensional flat screen of the computer world that some mutt may use to oversee the operations , in between computer chatting and surfing the web ,all the while believing that his or herself , the mutt , is one of the great geniuses of the universe , up there with Thomas Edison and such. That's just one scenario.

up
Voting closed 0

They would have to explain themselves, oh the horrors. Help, help, I'm being oppressed.

Considering how much gas those things eat, I think it's a good thing if they have to explain deviations from the route. Oil truck one day, no prob, on to the next. Swinging by Blanchard's every day on the way back to the lot, not so cool.

The GPS allows parents to know where their kid's bus is. So if it's late to the stop they can check the app and act accordingly. Or know when they have to leave the house so the sprout isn't standing around in the rain for an extra 10 minutes.

Guess what, employers like to know where their employees are while they're on the company dime. And those buses belong to the city, so taxpayers like to know their equipment isn't being used for personal business. And if there is some traffic snafu, buses can be directed around it. Or if there was a mass shooting event, BPS could tell which buses were in harms way and which weren't.

up
Voting closed 0

MA requires transport of elementary kids who are more than 1/2 mile out from their school.

Look at a map of where the schools are these days - you have to have buses.

up
Voting closed 0

Revise the Law, and increase the distance to 1 mile. Who do you think probably lobbied for the 1/2 mile requirement and why! Most law are not proposed by law makers, they are brought forward by lobbyist.

up
Voting closed 0

Really?

Must be nice to have domestic staff at home to help you out with that. Or would you have these 5 year olds with parents who have these things called "jobs" walk a mile alone?

These limits were in place when my over-60 MIL was young. This is a statewide law, and has been for at least a half-century. Sorry, but this has nothing to do with "lobbyists" as we currently know them to be.

up
Voting closed 0

Aaaa YA, maybe they could bike (Seeing that you're the resident bike lunatic), ride a scooter, walk with friends. Maybe then we wouldn't be having discussions about childhood obesity and diabetes.

Some kids travel over 0.5 mi to get to their bus stop, i did.

up
Voting closed 0

Swirls, I went to school in Boston , no school buses then, the Braves were though. Schools still there. But i will refrain from telling you it was uphill both ways. You usually knew who or what each house you walked by was all about , or if you rode the MTA , you might have had a neighborhood guy driving. The world has changed though. Why do so many people feel that they are entitled to make a good weeks pay , and that the rest should make the minimum wage, just a reflection Swirls not a dig at you now.

up
Voting closed 0

Actually, here's the correct cite:

Boston Public Schools students are eligible for transportation if they live more than:

1 mile from their elementary school;
1½ miles from their middle school (includes grades 6–8 attending K–8 schools);
2 miles from their high school.

up
Voting closed 0

That unions destroyed the auto industry or such and such company, please remember that in those companies, while facing financial problems, those companies chose to give their executives giant bonuses, raises, etc. look what happened with the company that made Twinkies, they tried blaming union demands for their planned closure, yet never talked about the pay raises for executives.

None the less, i completely agree with changing the busing practices for Boston schools. we burn so much money sending one kid from one end of the city to the next. we could reinvest that money into the school system.

up
Voting closed 0

Labor and benefit costs killed the companies. Union bosses are nothing more than another greedy layer of management getting rich off the backs of the membership. You can't expect to pay an unskilled worker 40 bucks an hour to press a button all day when a .30 cent microchip will do the same job. The public isn't willing to pay through the nose for uncompetitive priced products of equal or (in the case of the auto industry) less quality.

The teamsters told the bakers' union they were out of their damn minds to bankrupt twinkies by not accepting a deal but they did so anyway. The company was bailed out once by a conglomerate of union investors. That bankruptcy screwed over over a dozen other unions which had put money into keeping them alive.

up
Voting closed 0

Poor management has put companies out of business but can always hide behind blaming labor for it. I bet that there are some companies that if offered even free labor, would probably try to charge the help a cover charge to get into the site. By its nature , management is extractive , treating labor as a commodity without regard to its humanity. But people drive the economy by purchasing. Maybe Upton Sinclair's " The Jungle " should be required reading in a newly created Empathy and Humanity course in school, to ground people in an appreciation of people, before tempering them off in their chosen vocation.

up
Voting closed 0

After 20 years at the helm, Mayor Menino was unaware that 600+ bus drivers would strike today? If those 600 drivers were able to keep their looming strike a secret, they should all be in the CIA, not the Steelworkers union. Where's the BPD "Intelligent Unit" as Menino calls it? Isn't his kid assigned there? If City Hall and the BPD don't have the sources to know well in advance that a strike by a large, local, benign group is coming, is it any wonder that two Islamic terrorists found the marathon such an easy target? Scary. Pass the honorary degrees.

up
Voting closed 0

Th intelligence unit does not monitor unions and protestors. i am sure enough people in the schools knew of this and said nothing. Don't go crying about the police.

up
Voting closed 0

Court order desegregation dating from over 35 years ago in the City of Boston is a bad joke. The schools are not overwhelmingly 'minority', yet they still spend millions to run buses all over the city [causing major traffic problems daily due to the fact we are not Dallas or Houston, with wide straight streets,and our population density and congestion is much greater than most other American big cities. All this to:

1) Satisfy 'advocates' [most $professional$]
2) Send 'oppressed' so-called minority kids from one 'minority' dominated school to another 'minority' dominated school clear across town. And I put minority in quotes because 'minorities' make up at least 50% of the population of the City of Boston.

If the 'progressives' who demanded and implemented so-called busing over 35 years ago and still praise it today, were sincere, they would have made so all 'deprived' kids, regardless of their skin color or ethnic last name would have had an opportunity to be in the METCO program, and they would have implemented desegregation on a metro-wide basis, not just the City of Boston. They did none of this, instead they demonized so-called working class and middle class urban white kids and their families, smugly from the confines of their downtown offices, or their homes in Newton, Brookline, Weston, etc., Their kids of course would NEVER be allowed to be 'assigned' to some violent pit like Madison Park HS. No doubt their kids attended overwhelming white 'good' suburban schools or private prep schools.

up
Voting closed 0

Anybody have data on what they actually are? Like, what percentage are walk-zone, and what are the percentages within certain buffers (2, 5, >5 mile, etc.)

It would be much easier to parse this anti-bussing screed if we could know what the extent and cost of busing are in the first place - and how much of it is driven by the lack of schools in certain areas.

up
Voting closed 0

Really? Boston traffic is the fault of school buses? That's a new one on me.

up
Voting closed 0

Did all those cop cars have booster seats for any kids under 8?

up
Voting closed 0