Hey, there! Log in / Register

Jury awards Boston city worker $10.9 million in racial-discrimination and retaliation suit

Boston Magazine reports on the verdict.

Neighborhoods: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

should immediately appeal. Major institutional employers like municipal, state governments, educational institution, private employers (especially large companies) are MORBIDLY concerned with discrimination lawsuits from both private industry and the USDOJ, state agencies. They are also HEAVILY lobbied to promote 'diversity'. I do think connections play a role, but not active discrimination based on race, etc.

up
Voting closed 0

The plaintiff must have presented a case of discrimination that the City could not defend since the plaintiff won.

What do you make of the supervisor who was forced out when she refused to give the plaintiff a poor performance evaluation?

up
Voting closed 0

Is cleaning out her City Hall office?

HAAHAH!

Sorry, folks. Just some Saturday morning humor for ya.

up
Voting closed 0

Am I missing something? She was awarded 10 mill for what? Not getting a position she didn't apply for? Didn't it also state the position was given to someone well qualified?

up
Voting closed 0

Everybody sue their employers! We're being discriminated against, turns out we're supposed to be promoted every year even if we just sit on our asses and don't do anything!

up
Voting closed 0

Because the government violated the law and got hit with a fair punishment. I am so sick of random jerks on the internet who don't do basic research, don't read the article, and just assume that race discrimination lawsuits are frivolous.

The jury found that Leo and the City had not only engaged in a pattern of discrimination against black employees, but that they had also retaliated against Charles when she filed a charge of discrimination at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

The 'retaliation' bit is probably the bulk of the $10m. It's one thing for a department to not manage their history of race discrimination, but quite another to attack employees who call them out on it. Both are illegal.

up
Voting closed 0

You stated when I read. I am asking how they discriminated. Is the fact and was not prompted the cause? Is so, that would make it frivolous since she never applied for the promotion. Enlighten me.

up
Voting closed 0

It doesn't even matter if the discrimination charge was frivolous!

The 'retaliation' bit is probably the bulk of the $10m.

Probably so. Retaliation against an employee for filing a discrimination/harassment complaint (in the form of e.g. poor performance reviews) is illegal regardless of whether the original complaint is found to have merit.

up
Voting closed 0

What the law says.

What was going on in that department and systematic practices of discrimination.

That the courts know the laws better than you.

Etc.

up
Voting closed 0

The law is an ass.

I'd be interested in reading or hearing specifically what the city did that broke the law. What exactly was this 'systemstic' discrimination? I'd also like to know if an attempt was made to settle out of court.

I'd also be curious to know why this woman stayed at this job for 30 years if she was being treated poorly.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm not familiar with this, and in a quick search I didn't find any media coverage, but it doesn't look like this is the first time Leo has been named for discrimination. The info below came from the GPO website.

10-12250 - Bermudez v. Leo et al

January 3, 2011

JU 4.15

United States District Court District of Massachusetts, 1st Circuit
Case Type: Other Civil Rights
42:1983 Civil Rights Act

City of Boston, Defendant
John Doe 1-10, Defendant
Vivian Leo, Defendant
Bonnie Mines-Wallace, Defendant

Jerome Niedermeier, Mediator

Milagros Bermudez, Plaintiff

up
Voting closed 0

there's a history of discrimination lawsuits because some minority employees were encouraged to sue by 'advocates' and ambulance chasing lawyers, who know suing a government for discrimination is a slam dunk? 30 years on the job, undoubtedly well paid, close to or at retirement age; what a nice nest egg $10 million will make. Yes, I'm jaded,but I could very well be right. In our world, my theory is just as probable as this woman actually being a victim of discrimination based on her 'race'.

up
Voting closed 0

Hello, people claiming that minorities sue over nothing! Read this other article from the HERALD, and then tell us why the employee shouldn't have sued, and why the city shouldn't have lost.

I think Boston Magazine hasn't done a great job of representing the side that actually won the judgment. There's a longer piece from the Globe which helps describe the discriminatory situation better than Boston Magazine as well: https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/10/23/suffolk-jury-awards-million...

up
Voting closed 0

Looks like the discrimination victim's supervisor needs to be fired/demoted.

up
Voting closed 0