Hey, there! Log in / Register

Man who keeps running from the law locked up after allegedly killing a little girl on a bicycle - and allegedly trying to run away again

A Dorchester District Court judge today set bail of $500,000 for James Horton of Dorchester, a seasonal Boston DPW worker who is charged with hitting two little kids on bicycles Saturday night, then fleeing the scene as one of them lay there, dead.

Even if Horton makes bail on the charges of motor-vehicle homicide and leaving the scene of a collision causing death, however, he will remain behind bars until the case is decided - Judge Jonathan Tyne also revoked his bail on two earlier and still pending cases - one for driving after suspension, the other for allegedly hitting a family member and threatening her with a knife.

Courtroom 1 at Dorchester Municipal Court was filled for his arraignment - one side with relatives of Yadielys Deleon Camacho, the girl who died, the other with Horton's family - and six court officers on hand to ensure they did not mix. Her mother held a large and obviously well used stuffed duck.

As the case was read against him, Horton stood in the prisoner's dock with a green jacket completely hiding his head.

Assistant Suffolk County District Attorney Judith Lyons said that sometime Saturday, a friend of Horton's agreed to let him use her rental car, even though he did not have a valid license. Around 11 p.m., as Yadielys and her cousin Joseph Eduardo Cordova were riding bicycles outside a birthday party for their grandmother, Horton careened around a corner at "an excessive rate of speed" and plowed into the two children and a parked car, she said.

Horton immediately ran away, she said, adding Boston Police detectives found him "hiding in a residence in Brockton."

Lyons said Horton has a criminal record dating to his teens: More than 50 defaults, 14 restraining orders, 5 aliases and multiple probation violations. He spent "significant time" in prison following a 2002 conviction for an offense she did not specify. At the time of Saturday's crash, he was out on $500 bail for the alleged domestic attack in Brockton, she said.

Horton's attorney, Alyssa Hackett, acknowledged "it's a horrible thing that has happened," but asked for bail of just $2,500, saying the crash was just an accident, that Horton certainly didn't mean to kill and injure the children that night.

She said most of his legal problems were in his youth and that he's been relatively clean in the decade since. She said he volunteers at the New Rehoboth Bethel Apostolic Church in Dorchester - trying to steer kids away from winding up like him - and that keeping him locked up would deprive his children of the $188 a week he pays in child support.

She noted that he has strong Dorchester roots - where he grew up and still has family. She argued against revoking bail on the earlier cases, saying that's only done where the defendant poses a significant danger to the community and that Horton, despite being in court on a charge of running over a little kid, does not pose such a threat. He's non-violent, despite what the assistant DA said moments before, and has no OUI charges, she said.

The judge thought it over for less than a minute, then agreed to the prosecutor's request.

Innocent, etc.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Even if Horton makes bail on the charges of motor-vehicle homicide and leaving the scene of a collision causing death, however, he will remain behind bars under the case is decided - Judge Jonathan Tyne also revoked his bail on two earlier and still pending cases - one for driving after suspension, the other for allegedly hitting a family member snd threatening her with a knife.

So what's the point of setting bail on the new charges then?

up
Voting closed 0

Then he considers the request for revocation of bail on the earlier cases. Somebody who is directly involved in the criminal system probably has the specific reason for this, but I suspect it has to do with the possibility that the earlier cases could be decided before the new case and that would remove revocation of the bail in them, and then, what, he'd be free to go if found innocent on those before coming up on the newer case?

up
Voting closed 0

Exactly

Let's say He has New Case - Case A

Old Cases - Case B & C

A bail is set related to A, bail revoked on B&C If B&C get resolved, or he gets it continued and a new bail is set, the Bail on Case A may be what holds him.

up
Voting closed 0

I've read several crime reports - generally from Rox and Dot, that involved rental cars.

In my longish lifetime, I've only rented cars a few times (other than while traveling) when my car was in the shop, etc. I also know people in the city who dont own cars rent them occasionally for trips or errands, but these crimes seem to involve cars rented by the week. (I know this specifically in one case. Assuming in other cases).

Also in several cases I heard it was girlfriend who rented the car, but of course the boyfriend who committed the (alleged) felony while driving it.

Im rralky curious about this aspect. Does anyone have insight to how many people routinely just rent cars ? And the prevelance of their use in crimes within Boston's neighorhoods?

Or am I somehow just hearing these stories selectively? or in a poor context?

up
Voting closed 0

That might have something to do with it - owning a car in Boston is far more expensive than picking up a car for the weekend at a $16 rate if you only do that a couple of times a month.

This is also true in cities like Washington DC, Seattle, etc. I've been able to pick up super cheap weekend rentals like this all over the country when on business trips.

up
Voting closed 0

We are a one car household in Boston. One year, our car was totaled in January. Insurance paid for 30 days of rental carness. At the end of that we spent 6 months where we just rented cars on the weekend when we needed one and the weather wasn't going to suck. Never had to dig out the car and it gave us the time to find a used car nearly identical to the old one.

up
Voting closed 0

But yes, serious criminals use rental cars all the time. That way, when a police officer runs the plate, the drivers criminal history, including active warrants, don't show up. Also, as you point out, criminals will have girlfriends rent the cars, so when something serious happens, and the cops go to the girlfriend and ask her who was driving her car, she can say she just doesn't know. That is against the rental agreement, but not really against the law.

This case here though? Doesn't sound like the guy was doing some active criminal activity, but who knows.

up
Voting closed 0

a friend of Horton's agreed to let him use her rental car, even though he did not have a valid license

(UPDATED) Can this friend be charged with anything? Or is she simply wide open for a civil suit?

up
Voting closed 0

Not the suspect.

up
Voting closed 0

"A friend". Don't know that she's a girlfriend.

------
I'm aware of the details least one serious felony. Multiple drug dealers involved. Multiple guns. Multiple cars. At least 2 of the 3 cars discussed in the investigation were rentals. Rented by the girlfriends. All of the suspects used cell phones contracted by their girlfriends. At the time, this story was new to me and I assumed unusual. These idiots had all been shot and/or arrested. They were not criminal geniuses.

But as I hear similar stories repeated, I wonder if there's another angle that can be explored here , or used to intervene earlier in before crimes are committed. Or are they just isolated incidents? Regular city dwellers renting cars because its cheaper on the weekend and the T can be unreliable? I honestly don't know.

up
Voting closed 0

Is really the only thing I can think of. Knowingly allowing an unlicensed operator to operate a motor vehicle owned by the suspect or under his control. $500 for the first offense and 2nd offense is less than your standard misdemeanor (1 year in jail or $1,000 fine).

Whoever, being the owner or person in control of a motor vehicle, knowingly permits such motor vehicle to be operated by a person who is unlicensed or whose license has been suspended or revoked shall be punished for a first offense by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than 1 year or, for a second or subsequent offense by a fine of not less than $1,000 and not more than $1,500 or imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than 2 1/2 years, or both such fine and imprisonment.

Edit, As I just looked at the actual MGL, the penalties have been updated I guess.

up
Voting closed 0

The issue is not car rentals. The system is allowing repeat offenders bail to commit more serious crimes and accidents that unfortunately led to fatalities.

up
Voting closed 0

Is anyone else not surprised at his history? Now someone is dead.

up
Voting closed 0

What do you have to do to be unemployable by the City of Boston?

up
Voting closed 0

Another cheap shot to city employees. It amazes me that so many people take a shot at any public employee with no basis other than the fact that it is a public employee. Public employees are no better or worse than any other large group of workers, there are good bad and average. Just like your workplace.

.

up
Voting closed 0

I think the OP's point is that given this individual's criminal history, many of us are surprised that he was hired by the city, and for a job that could conceivably involve public contact. I would have assumed standards that apply for the hiring of school employees, for example, would apply across the board.

up
Voting closed 0

I've worked in the public (City Hall) and private sector. Apples and oranges. City Hall is littered with incompetent people calling the shots.

up
Voting closed 0

the backslappers of corporate boards.

up
Voting closed 0

You're correct that public employees are no better or worse than any other large group of workers.

But the post you replied to correctly implied (while exaggerating, yes) that it is one hell of a lot harder to lose one's job while working for any government entity, than it is for a private company. There's just no arguing that one.

up
Voting closed 0

Protest the use of excessive force, by police, towards unarmed black men. That'll get you fired.

up
Voting closed 0

inhale.

up
Voting closed 0