Hey, there! Log in / Register

Sorry, sir, but the Downtown Crossing Bath and Body Works doesn't have a drive thru

Car getting a ticket for being in a pedestrian only area in Downtown Crossing

It must've been National Ignore All the Signs Night in Downtown Crossing, because behind this guy getting a ticket for driving down Washington Street shortly before 7 p.m. was a whole line of other motorists who seem to have figured oh, what the hell, let's go for it.

Cars on Washington Street
Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

"Oh, what the hell" pretty much describes both the attitude of drivers towards driving through DTX, and the attitude of police towards non-commercial vehicles with no apparent legitimate reason to be there. Even so, this circus parade is pushing it.

up
Voting closed 0

THE DUDE: Ah, fuck it.
THE BIG LEBOWSKI: Sure, "fuck it!" That's your answer! Tattoo it on your forehead! That's your answer to everything! Your "revolution" is over, Mr. Lebowski! Condolences! The bums lost!
[As the Dude opens the door.]
THE BIG LEBOWSKI: My advice is, do what your parents did! Get a job, sir! The bums will always lose -- do you hear me, Lebowski? THE BUMS WILL ALWAYS--
[The Dude shuts the door on the old man's bellowing]

up
Voting closed 0

At it again, right Mark?

up
Voting closed 0

The pedestrians weren't dressed like traffic cones!

up
Voting closed 0

Do you enjoy rants against bicyclists?

If not, why do you bait for one where it's not at all relevant?

up
Voting closed 0

Its Boston, every day is Ignore All the Signs Day and Ignore all the Traffic Laws day. And the city/police do next to no enforcement. If the guy driving on the sidewalk had hit a pedestrian he could have avoided the ticket.

up
Voting closed 0

people are going to think it is a road. Especially in this dark, rainy, poor visibility weather, drivers are paying attention to pedestrians, vehicles, and danger risks more than the countless store and other signs.

up
Voting closed 0

Precisely why we need to do away with the stupid taxi exemption and just put barricades around DTX.

up
Voting closed 0

Perhaps medical, police, and fire emergencies can be handled by pedicabs then?

up
Voting closed 0

Sure, because no one invented collapsible bollards in your make believe universe.

up
Voting closed 0

given all the EMS responses for muggings and drug ODs, police responses for shoplifting/robbery/assault, and various MBTA and utility service visits in your pedestrian and bicycle Nirvana.

up
Voting closed 0

> MBTA and utility service visits

I mean, honestly, have you ever looked at how a collapsible bollard works? They have a hinge, so that utility companies can fold them down without destroying them...

And even then, there are plenty of bollards that aren't destroyed by emergency vehicles driving over them. They pop right back up after you drive over them. They just act to tell cars that they're not supposed to drive down a street in a more visible way than just a sign.

Welcome to the 21st century!!

up
Voting closed 0

There would be a lot less need for ambulances if entitled dangerous drivers stopped hitting pedestrians.

up
Voting closed 0

MarkKKK's right - people are dropping like flies in traffic free centers of major European and Asian cities.

Bollards: the silent killer. We can end death by bollard in our lifetime.

up
Voting closed 0

...Many American shopping malls, and office buildings that don't allow access to emergency vehicles. Outside of the posted delivery hours, that section of Washington St should be no more accessible to auto traffic than the corridors of the Prudential Center or the Burlington Mall, etc.

up
Voting closed 0

people are going to think it is a road.

They can think that all they want, but even a 17 year old fresh out of driver's ed knows that just because it's a road doesn't mean you can drive on it. Most drivers (not you, perhaps) are aware that they must also pay attention to signs and traffic signals, and not drive on surfaces which, yes, are roads, but no, are not there for them to drive on, as indicated by signs and signals. These include busways, one-way streets when approached from the wrong direction, private ways, and restricted access pedestrian areas.

For someone who's such a fan of driving, you give frequent evidence of needing a basic refresher in the rules of the road.

up
Voting closed 0

You missed my point about the poor visibility and drivers concentrating more on pedestrians than signage. If you want to lecture on signage like DO NOT ENTER, start with bicyclists.

up
Voting closed 0

Last night was unusual

In what way? It was dark? It was rainy? Gee, that sure is unusual in Boston in December.

You need to quit with your weaksauce "driving is haaarrrrrrd" whining all the time. It's a pedestrian area. Pedestrians are allowed to walk there. You are NOT allowed to drive there. If numerous signs and a large pedestrian presence are not enough clues for you, you need to admit that you're just not up to the task, turn in your license and get off the road.

up
Voting closed 0

I don't drive there. I avoid Boston and especially Cambridge as much as possible and choose to spend my time and money in less hostile environments.

up
Voting closed 0

...Montana?

up
Voting closed 0

I don't drive there. I avoid Boston and especially Cambridge as much as possible and choose to spend my time and money in less hostile environments.

The populations of both Boston and Cambridge, in their entirety, just breathed an enormous sigh of relief upon learning this.

up
Voting closed 0

I live in Watertown, and I imagine every jerkoff who almost runs me down in the crosswalk (with the walk light, mind you) to be a member of MarkKK's er, clan.

up
Voting closed 0

The bike lane at the corner of Mass Ave and Columbus at around that same time:

IMAGE(http://eherot-misc.s3.amazonaws.com/entitled_drivers.jpg)

up
Voting closed 0

Know what's much worse than those two cars in that bike lane?

The 20+ cars parked in the bike lane on Centre Street before the Holy Name Rotary every weekend. Every single weekend.

up
Voting closed 0

on the crappy, rainy night in that photo. No harm being done, except perhaps to the bollards.

up
Voting closed 0

when the coast looks clear too

no harm no foul!!!!!

up
Voting closed 0

and can't simply use regular roadway lanes while disabled people are so much more adept at overcoming minor obstacles.

up
Voting closed 0

are rules, was my point, but i'm glad you so adeptly didn't bother arguing that you pick and choose which of them you'll decide are worth following.

hopefully somebody exercises the same lack of legal integrity as you and throws your computers etc into a bonfire

up
Voting closed 0

When cyclists ride in the street lunatics like yourself yell "get out of the road!" and sometimes even purposely hit them like the guy in Cambridge recently. Drivers are so spoiled that they think they can have it both ways. Time to start taking matters into our own hands and keying the hell out of cars that park in sidewalks and drive down pedestrian zones like the fools in the photo above since the cops do nothing.

up
Voting closed 0

Just because they're not in the photo doesn't mean they don't exist. I was out biking that night and I saw plenty of other bicyclists out too, including on Mass Ave.

up
Voting closed 0

for not a long time (looks likes lights are on and engine perhaps running?). I can see if she/he was parked there for any length of time (if so, than call the police) but this pic gives me no indication that this was the case.

Cars will usually pull over along side the sidewalk since they can't stop in the middle of the road and yes, this means, at times, bike lanes will become blocked.

Since cars happen, why not just take the full lane, which, by law, you are allowed and go around the temporarily parked vehicle?

up
Voting closed 0

Why is it unthinkable for a car to stop in the driving lane but totally reasonable to park in the bike lane? Why is it OK for a driver to screw over cyclists but unthinkable to treat other drivers the same way? Is a car a bike to you? Is a lane a parking spot to you? Why literally go out of your way to put cyclists at risk? Why is it OK for cars to break the law? Why should cyclists have to die trying to swerve around cars in the bike lane just because drivers don't feel like finding a parking spot?

Your dumb post brings up a lot of questions and is a perfect example of how uneducated, dangerous and entitled the average Boston driver is.

up
Voting closed 0

Only asking because that was the last time I saw somebody get owned.

up
Voting closed 0

Bike lanes are not parking spots. Even when it's "just for a minute". The rules apply even when it would be more convenient to ignore them.

Those cars should be ticketed and perhaps towed. But since that doesn't happen to the double parkers on any other road in Boston, I'll skip holding my breath.

up
Voting closed 0

The signs there say No Stopping, not No Parking, not No Standing. No Stopping. The cars have no business being there.

up
Voting closed 0

And I still am perplexed by what appears to be a policeman actually writing a ticket, which could actually lead to a driver facing consequences for their idiocy

up
Voting closed 0

I live on one side of DTX and work on the other, I traverse it several times daily. I get, I suppose, a kick out of the typical comments here

muggings and drug ODs, police responses for shoplifting/robbery/assault

which sound like people who have not actually been at DTX since the 80s.

The neighborhood is well over the hump of an amazing metamorphosis, you may or may not like the new DTX but it's thousands of professionals, Roche Bros, the Millennium tower. The remaining dilapidated storefronts are now quite valuable, laying fallow until landlords get their rents.

Incidentally I see BDP writing errant cars tickets for driving in DTX *all* *the* *time*.

Taxis are not the majority of traffic, it's commercial vehicles that serve the stores.

DTX is one of the few places in Boston that actually looks and feels like a vibrant city, including some diversity. I'd not swap it in a million years for e.g. the antiseptic and soulless Copley.

up
Voting closed 0

I get it - you don't want to miss out on the big sale but chill out. I'm sure there are plenty of three wick candles in flavors like Sweater Weather and Jingle All The Way to go around.

up
Voting closed 0

Open the DTX section Washington Street to traffic like it was meant to be before they changed it in the late 70s. It is 2015 and the "Downtown Crossing" experiment of the late 70s/early 80s clearly failed. With all the new development and residences in the area there is no need for the old pseudo suburban walking mall model. The "encouraging people to linger" idea didn't work. Look at the people who lingered. Let it be a vibrant through street once again.

up
Voting closed 0

Another one who's clearly never been to DTX. How do you think that area residents get around? They're sure not driving around the neighborhood. Go by the area at lunchtime some time, or during morning or evening rush hour.

up
Voting closed 0

Ever hear of sidewalks? People, residents included, do not need both sidewalks and the middle of Washington Street itself to get where they are going. The point is not that people in the area should get around the area by driving. The point is that the closing of Washington Street to traffic in the late 70s achieved the opposite effect of what it wanted to do. It did not create the promised blissful, flower strewn, outdoor strolling, shopping and lingering atmosphere. It achieved a run down, dirty, junkie infested wasteland. And I'm someone who is at DTX every day and doesn't own a car. Funny as it sounds, with all the revitalization of that area, traffic moving through is just what it needs.

up
Voting closed 0

People, residents included, do not need both sidewalks and the middle of Washington Street itself to get where they are going.

Yes, they do.

up
Voting closed 0

Is gold. Pure gold. I love you all.

up
Voting closed 0