Hey, there! Log in / Register

Harvard gets $2-million grant to study poverty

Wonder if the researchers will look at the impact of paying workers a living wage on reducing poverty rates.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Not paying taxes on acres and acres of land might have something to do with it as well. Or taking $35 billion out of the economy and hoarding it.

up
Voting closed 0

You forgot about their shell corporations and charging expensive tuition, to pay sometimes professors whose only qualifications are political connections, such that poor students can't afford to go to school there.

Endowment hoarding and running what amounts to to a real estate and investment fund shielded from normal taxation and oversight is a big deal. At least some of Yale's administration owned up to this fact. Harvard not so much.

up
Voting closed 0

such that poor students can't afford to go to school there.

But financial aid is not one of them. If your family earns less than $65,000 per year, your parents pay nothing for you to attend Harvard.

up
Voting closed 0

Or taking $35 billion out of the economy and hoarding it.

But that's not how a college endowment works.

up
Voting closed 0

You mean, the cash is actually invested as capital in companies and real estate and not just sitting in a vault under Cambridge?!?

up
Voting closed 0

Or taking $35 billion out of the economy and hoarding it.

FYI: Harvard doesn't have a huge mattress with $35 billion under it. The $35 billion is actively in the economy due to investments.

up
Voting closed 0

Harvard dining workers make on average $21.89 / hour, which is above the living wage of $15.04 / hour in Cambridge; and a helluva lot more than they would make if they were working in a regular food service job.

Are we saying that Harvard shouldn't do any research until it settles this strike? Or shouldn't be able to accept any grant money? That's just silly.

https://www.cambridgema.gov/~/media/Files/personneldepartment/living%20w...

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/10/12/facing-financial-constrain...

up
Voting closed 0

If you are lucky enough to score subsidized housing and subsidized medical insurance, and your kids get a free ride for school, then $15.04 is a 'living wage' in Cambridge.

up
Voting closed 0

Most HUDS workers don't get year round work and are disallowed from collecting unemployment during summer and winter breaks. The average HUDS worker actually takes home less than $35k/year.

If you want to look at living wage rates,a living wage in Boston/Newton/Cambridge for a single parent is $55,895.

http://livingwage.mit.edu/metros/14460

up
Voting closed 0

$21.89 is only an average hourly rate. And aside from that, the Globe wrote, last year, I believe, that one has to make a minimum of $80K to be able to live in Boston and that is about $38.00 bucks per hour. I'm sure that Cambridge is not too far behind, at least to live in certain sections.

up
Voting closed 0

Food service workers should make $38.00 an hour?

up
Voting closed 0

Is that before tax or after tax? Probably will have a little over half of that left after tax.

up
Voting closed 0

Totally above board, not a grifter. never trading on race and the Harvard imprimatur to feed his own empire and ego?

This Henry Louis Gates:

http://www.npr.org/2015/06/25/417516353/henry-louis-gates-apologizes-ove...

Nothing to see here folks, move along.

up
Voting closed 0

$10 million, not $2 million.

up
Voting closed 0

The $10 million grant is total funding to the think tank, $2 million is specifically targeted to the study of poverty.

up
Voting closed 0

Only $2 million? I feel better now...

up
Voting closed 0

It makes sense to learn about the details of the root causes of poverty if we want to try to work to improve the lives of the poor. We don't really know everything, although there are a million simple (and typically wrong) assumptions about what's wrong and how to fix it.

With that said, I worry that this $10 million (according to the Globe) will pay for a lot of people to poke around for a few years without really coming up with solid, actionable steps that will really help.

up
Voting closed 0

Knowing is half the battle!

But uh, that leaves the other half, of taking that knowledge and trying or being able to apply it.

up
Voting closed 0

would it not be great if Harvard donated the 2 million to organizations that are helping to fight poverty now.

up
Voting closed 0

A study would allow them to see what does and doesn't work in fighting poverty. The Great Society spending on a War on Poverty since LBJ has been largely a massive and costly failure because the funds haven't been shifted to the most successful programs.

up
Voting closed 0

Don't know anything about this project. But at universities, most research funding supports graduate students doing the 'real work'. If it does that, a reduces their need to take on debt, that's a good thing.

up
Voting closed 0

They have billions... why are they pulling grants

up
Voting closed 0

That's how you get billions.

up
Voting closed 0

Go figure out how academic and research funding works. Then report back.

up
Voting closed 0

...point to a tweet and a Boston Globe article that state Harvard got $10 million, not $2 million...

up
Voting closed 0

The guy gave $10 million, but $2 million of that was specifically for studying poverty.

up
Voting closed 0

Dear Members of the Harvard Community:

As you are likely aware, the University and UNITE HERE Local 26, the union that represents Harvard’s dining services employees, have been negotiating a new contract since May.

The University hoped to reach a resolution with Local 26. We value these employees as integral members of our community and have ensured that their wages—currently an average of $21.89 per hour—and benefits have consistently been top of market in Greater Boston and higher than the Cambridge living wage of $15.04 an hour. Unfortunately, no agreement was reached before the contract expired, and the Union elected to initiate a strike action.

As the Union’s work stoppage goes into its second week, I write to update you on the status of the negotiations and to outline the proposals the University has made to reach a resolution that allows us to achieve our two main objectives: (1) recognizing the employees’ contributions to Harvard by providing them with wages, healthcare, and other benefits that lead the local and national market for comparable positions; and (2) engaging in proper stewardship of the University’s mission to advance outstanding teaching and research by ensuring resources to support faculty, students, and staff across our community in areas such as financial aid, research, and other academic priorities.

Proposals
To date, the University has put several proposals on the table toward a resolution that would achieve these goals. The Union has rejected these proposals.

On wages, the University has proposed an increase that would raise the average rate for dining workers to $24.08 per hour by the end of the contract. This is well in excess of the average hourly wage for Local 26 dining service workers elsewhere in eastern Massachusetts, $14.61 for general service employees.

We also sought to address the Union’s concerns that some of its members were unable to work over the summer because the majority of dining halls are closed. The University proposed enabling members to draw unemployment benefits temporarily—an idea originally supported by the Union. After Local 26 rejected that proposal, we offered summer stipends of up to $250 a week to employees who are available to work during summer break, even if there are no open shifts. In other words, employees would be eligible for the stipend even for weeks during which they did no work for the University.

Local 26 has rejected this offer. Yesterday, they presented a counter offer that effectively amounts to approximately a 22.5 percent increase in compensation over a four-year contract, including stipends of up to $450 per week during summer and winter breaks for employees who are available but are not needed for work because many dining halls are closed.

On healthcare, the University has made no changes to health insurance for Local 26 members since 2008, even as costs have risen dramatically. To secure a new contract this year, Harvard proposed that members join the university health insurance plan that has been agreed to by unions representing more than 5,000 employees on campus.

Under the plan most popular with Harvard University Dining Services (HUDS) employees, the monthly health insurance cost is currently $104 for an individual and $281 for a family. These costs are well below national averages: according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average food service employee pays $140 a month for individual coverage and $536 per month for family coverage. Lower-wage workers would also be protected from higher costs through tiered premiums in which those who earn less pay a smaller portion of health insurance costs and co-pay reimbursements that reduce out-of-pocket expenses. More information about proposed changes is available here.

When the Union rejected this proposal, the University offered an alternative: contributing $25 million over four years for dining services workers to join Unite Here Health, the health insurance plan offered by Local 26 to its members. The Union has rejected this alternative and has refused to participate in any meaningful dialogue toward a resolution on this important matter.

We stand ready to continue to work with Local 26 and mediators to try to find a fair and reasonable resolution, but this will require engagement by the Union on these issues.

Looking ahead
HUDS is working diligently to mitigate disruption to our community members caused by the Union’s strike action, and will continue to communicate with students and school-level managers about schedule adjustments and facility availability. The well-being of our students is and will remain an unwavering commitment, and we are grateful to the many individuals who have worked to ensure that dining halls remain operational.

We are deeply disappointed that Local 26 has declined to engage in a constructive dialogue. While any labor negotiation inevitably includes challenging issues, the University and its labor unions have always found common ground on the importance of good faith efforts to achieve a resolution that meets the needs of employees and the long-term strength of the University’s teaching and research mission.

Even at a time of financial constraints across higher education, Harvard representatives have approached this negotiation with these goals in mind, bringing to the table proposals that would ensure that Harvard remains a leader on compensation for dining hall workers on wages, healthcare, retirement, and other benefits when compared to peers throughout the region.

Harvard deeply values the contributions of its dining services workers, and our proposals reflect that fundamental reality. To learn more about wages and benefits for Harvard dining services employees, please visit http://hr.harvard.edu/local26.

Sincerely,

Marilyn Hausammann
Vice President for Human Resources>

up
Voting closed 0

And how much an hour does dear Marilyn rake in?

up
Voting closed 0

Is this an Onion headline??

up
Voting closed 0

Well after all, this work is needed. I mean no one has ever 'studied' poverty before. I'm sure the eggheads at Harvard will discover new things we never imagined.

up
Voting closed 0