<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>independentminded's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/blog/867"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.universalhub.com/blog/867/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.universalhub.com/blog/867/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-04-22T01:05:20-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Why I Have Decided to Leave UniversalHub (for awhile, anyway):</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/12521" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/12521</id>
    <published>2008-01-25T22:34:24-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-26T09:21:35-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello out there, folks. </p>
<p>Just  to let you all know that, after afew weeks of thinking this through, I've made my final decidion.  I've decided to leave UniversalHub for the following reasons:</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello out there, folks. </p>
<p>Just  to let you all know that, after afew weeks of thinking this through, I've made my final decidion.  I've decided to leave UniversalHub for the following reasons:</p>
<p>A)  It's very clear, that, due to my different style of posting, interacting, conversing, communicating, writing and socializing, and  a different way of looking things generally, that I do not  fit in here.</p>
<p>B)  There are plenty of things that I would've liked to engage in discourse about besides everything Boston, and it's clear that there's no room for that here.</p>
<p>C) It's also clear that I will not be missed here on Universal Hub, and I have not contributed to this blog in a way that was to people's liking here.    Hey...I gave it the old college try,  so to speak, but it hasn't worked out for me on the long run.  On that note, I will leave you all to have a grand old time without me..and have at it.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Holiday  time recipe--for anyone interested:</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/11576" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/11576</id>
    <published>2007-11-25T20:53:18-05:00</published>
    <updated>2007-11-26T09:23:46-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Home &#039;n&#039; hearth" />
    <category term="cooking/baking" />
    <category term="desserts" />
    <category term="Holiday cooking" />
    <category term="sweets" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hey, folks:</p>
<p>It's the holiday time again, and I figured I'd share my favorite recipe with you all for anyone who'e into baking.   If others are willing to put in their favorite recipes for the holidays, no matter what it may be, you're more than welcome.  Here goes:</p>
<p><b>Chocolate Pound Cake with Rich Chocolate Glaze:</b></p>
<p>                         <b>Cake</b>:</p>
<p>2 cups all-purpose white flour<br />
2 cups of sugar<br />
2 sticks of unsalted butter (I always melt the butter first)<br />
3 large eggs<br />
1 tsp. vanilla extract<br />
1/4 tsp. salt<br />
3/4 tsp. baking soda<br />
1 tsp. baking powder</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hey, folks:</p>
<p>It's the holiday time again, and I figured I'd share my favorite recipe with you all for anyone who'e into baking.   If others are willing to put in their favorite recipes for the holidays, no matter what it may be, you're more than welcome.  Here goes:</p>
<p><b>Chocolate Pound Cake with Rich Chocolate Glaze:</b></p>
<p>                         <b>Cake</b>:</p>
<p>2 cups all-purpose white flour<br />
2 cups of sugar<br />
2 sticks of unsalted butter (I always melt the butter first)<br />
3 large eggs<br />
1 tsp. vanilla extract<br />
1/4 tsp. salt<br />
3/4 tsp. baking soda<br />
1 tsp. baking powder<br />
2 Tbsp. instant coffee<br />
2 Tbsp. hot water<br />
6 squares unsweetened baking chocolate (melted)</p>
<p>A)  Preheat oven to 350 degrees Fahrenheit</p>
<p>B)  Cream the butter, sugar and vanilla extract until light and fluff, when the mixture <b>really and truly</b> stays fluffy and holds.  What I do on this occasion is to melt the butter in a saucepan first, and <b>then</b>  add it to the sugar for creaming.</p>
<p>C)  Combine the dry ingredients (i. e. the Flour, salt, baking soda and baking powder together into a smaller bowl.  Sift together if you want, otherwise, just blend them together with a spoon or fork.</p>
<p>D)   Fold in the eggs, one at a time.</p>
<p>E)  Stir in the melted baking chocolate, then beat on a <b>high</b> setting for 3 minutes.</p>
<p>F)  Dissolve the 2 Tbsp. of instant coffee in the 2 Tbsp. of hot water, then add enough water to create 1 1/2 cups of the coffee solution.  Then, alternately fold in and combine the coffee/water solution and the flour mixture.  Mix the cake batter thoroughly.</p>
<p>G)  Spoon the cake batter into a <b>generously greased</b> 10-inch bunte pan or tube cake pan.  </p>
<p>H)  Bake the cake at 350 degrees F. for 65-70 minutes.</p>
<p>I)  Turn the cake over onto a paper plate seated on a metal rack and allow to air-cool.   Hopefully, the cake will fall out of the tube onto the paper plate of its own accord, and come out shaped like the tube that it was cooked in.</p>
<p>                           <b>Rich Chocolate Glaze</b>:</p>
<p>1 2/3 cups of semi-sweet chocolate chip morsels<br />
2/3 cup of heavy cream<br />
1 Tbsp. vanilla extract<br />
3 Tbsp. confectioners sugar</p>
<p>A)  In a saucepan, combine the semi-sweet chocolate morsels and the heavy cream, cooking over low-ish heat,  until melted, stirring <b>constantly</b>!   Add in the confectioners sugar and the vanilla extract.  Keep heating and stirring the glaze until smooth, rich and creamy-looking.  </p>
<p>B).  When the cake is all cooled,  (I recommend waiting until the cake is completely cooled and inverted onto a paper plate or whatever before making the chocolate glaze.) dribble the glaze onto the cake, letting it go over the sides, if need be.  It's fun.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>West Side Story--My Own Synopsis:</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/11277" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/11277</id>
    <published>2007-11-06T15:51:18-05:00</published>
    <updated>2007-11-06T16:18:53-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Entertainment" />
    <category term="musicals" />
    <category term="popular culture" />
    <category term="Urban gang warfare" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hey folks!   Once again, I've decided to break from blogging about Boston affairs, and blog about other things.  Although I've written other diaries in the past about my alltime favorite film, <i>West Side Story</i>,  here is my own synopsis of it.  Here goes:</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hey folks!   Once again, I've decided to break from blogging about Boston affairs, and blog about other things.  Although I've written other diaries in the past about my alltime favorite film, <i>West Side Story</i>,  here is my own synopsis of it.  Here goes:</p>
<p>Loosely based on the renowned Shakespeare play <i>Romeo and Juliet</i>, West Side Story is a beautiful movie-musical classic set on the finger-snapping, pulsating West Side of 1950's/1960's New York City.&nbsp; It involves love and&nbsp; romance that develops amid conflict between two warring NYC street gangs;&nbsp; the white Ethnic American Jets and the newly-arrived Puerto Rican Sharks, only to be destroyed later.
</p><p>
The Jets claim and stake out their turf with a tough, macho bravado, and are determined to drive off the Sharks who're also vying for a piece of the small amount of turf that both gangs must share.&nbsp; A melee between the Sharks and Jets erupts on the playground, which is broken up by Lt. Schrank and Officer Krupke.&nbsp;
</p><p>
Tony, the founder and ex-Jets gangleader, who is looking for something beyond gang life and the streets but doesn't know <b>what</b> he's looking for, has been hired to work fulltime at Doc's Candy Store.&nbsp; The elderly, kindly Doc attemps to mentor the kids, but to no avail.
</p><p>
Back on their turf, the Jets, under Riff's leadership, are now debating what to do,  and ultimately decide to challenge the Shark gangleader, Bernardo, to a rumble.&nbsp; Riff decides that Tony would be the best lieutenant and  calls on his old friend to help .&nbsp; He goes to Doc's Candy Store to enlist&nbsp; Tony's help, but Tony turns Riff down several times.&nbsp; Riff then persuades Tony to come to the dance at the gym that night,&nbsp; with&nbsp; "Who knows?&nbsp; Maybe what you're lookin' for will be twitchin' at the dance tonight!" <br /><br />
<br />&nbsp; Reluctantly, Tony agrees to meet Riff&nbsp; and the Jets at the dance, where  Tony and Maria meet&nbsp; and fall in love. The sparks really begin to fly, as steadily rising tensions between the Jets and Sharks worsen.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
Maria, the sister of the Shark gangleader, Bernardo, is a pretty 17-year-old girl who has come to America to marry Chino, another member of the Sharks who&nbsp; is Bernardo's friend and right-hand man and works as a delivery assistant .
</p><p>
At the Bridal Shop where Maria and Bernardo's girlfriend, Anita, both work as seamstresses, Anita is busy altering a white communion dress for Maria to wear to the dance.&nbsp; Despite Maria's pleas that&nbsp; the neck be lowered, her complaints that she'll be the only&nbsp; one at the dance in white, and attempts to distract Anita by talking about other things, Anita continues with her work. Maria tries on the white dress, loves it, and is excited about coming to the dance.&nbsp; The Sharks finally come to call.
</p><p>
That night, at the dance,&nbsp;  attempts by social worker, Glad Hand,&nbsp; to engage the Jets and Sharks in a "get-together" dance,&nbsp; which fails miserably.&nbsp; The Jets and Sharks each rally with their own kind and the dance quickly becomes a fierce competition between the two gangs.&nbsp; At that point, Tony arrives, and is greeted and embraced by his old friend Riff and his girlfriend, Graziella.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
Tony and Maria see each other from across the room, meet,&nbsp; fall in love and begin dancing together,&nbsp; but are pulled up short by an angry Bernardo, who orders Chino to take Maria home despite her protests that it is only her first dance.
</p><p>
At this point,  Riff intervenes and insists that he, the Jets, Bernardo and the Sharks meet at Doc's at midnight for a war council.&nbsp; Bernardo agrees.
</p><p>
Meanwhile, after bringing Anita home from the dance, Bernardo, Anita, the other Sharks and their girls party on their tenament rooftop, where they argue about the virtues and vices of the American experience.&nbsp; On the way down from the rooftop, Bernardo invites Anita to meet him on the roof later, to which Anita replies&nbsp; "I'm an American girl now!&nbsp; I don't wait!"
</p><p>
Tony goes to Maria's apartment, calls for her, and mounts the fire escape, where they introduce themselves to each other and  agree to meet at the Bridal Shop at six o'clock the next evening.
</p><p>
Shortly before midnight, Riff, the Jets and their girls assemble outside Doc's Candy Store.&nbsp; Officer Krupke arrives, warns the Jets against troublemaking,  and is lampooned by the Jets when he departs.&nbsp; The Jets and their girls enter the Candy Store and sit down, awaiting the Sharks' arrival.&nbsp; Riff makes it clear to the girls that they don't belong at the war council, while Anybodys, a&nbsp; tomboy and sort of a Jets "wannabe", tries to make herself invisible by hiding, only to be spotted by Riff, who gestures for her to go despite her giving him a "let me stay" look.&nbsp; Unlike Graziella and Velma, who exit quietly,&nbsp; however, Anybodys shoves the Sharks like a big tough guy.&nbsp;
</p><p>&nbsp; Doc's pleas with the boys to talk it out instead of fighting fall on deaf ears.&nbsp; Jet gangleader Riff then challenges Bernardo to a rumble, which is promptly accepted.&nbsp; After a&nbsp; spat that culminates in the exchange of racial and ethnic insults by both gangs, the war council begins&nbsp; The Jets and Sharks agree to meet for the rumble the next night, after dark, under the West Side High way, after which Riff and Bernardo shake hands to seal the deal.<br /></p>
<p>&nbsp; As the Jets and Sharks are calling the weapons, Tony comes in, ignores Riff's entreaties for him to line himself with the Jets, and suggests that the Rumble be clinched by a fair fight...a fist fight involving the best man from each gang.&nbsp; The fair fight is agreed upon and Ice is chosen by&nbsp; Riff to take on Bernardo, despite Bernardo's obvious disappointment over the fact that he won't be fighting Tony.
</p><p>
In comes Lt. Schrank, who openly displays his prejudice against the Puerto Rican Sharks for their ethnicity and culture by roughly banishing them from the Candy Store.&nbsp; He then asks the Jets where the rumble would be taking place, declaring&nbsp; "I'm for <b>you</b>!&nbsp; I'll even lend a hand if things get rough!"&nbsp; When the Jets ultimately refuse to disclose where the rumble is taking place,&nbsp; Lt. Schrank insults the Jets about  their ethnic immigrant/family backgrounds, strongly revealing his dislike for the Jets as well as the Sharks. <br /><br />
When the Jets leave the Candy Store, Lt. Schrank remains vitriolic, promising the Jets&nbsp; "I'll find out where the rumble's gonna be!&nbsp; But be sure to finish each other off before I get there!&nbsp;  'Cause if ya don't, I <b>will</b>!" <br /><br />
&nbsp; After bitterly&nbsp; mouthing off to Doc and lifting a cigar from the counter, Schrank angrily leaves the Candy Store.
</p><p>When the Jets have left, Tony, who has been cleaning up the store, tells Doc not to let it get him, and that he's very much in love.&nbsp; Doc, however, is not reassured.
</p><p>
The next afternoon, at the Bridal Shop, Maria gaily prepares for her upcoming meeting with Tony, and the other girls who work with her make fun of Maria for acting so vain.
</p><p>
That evening is the big evening, which will mean different things and have markedly different results for different people.&nbsp;  The Jets and Sharks prepare for the rumble.   Tony and Maria meet at the Bridal Shop as planned,&nbsp; and Anita, who has made plans for a big evening out with Bernardo after the rumble, and clearly disapproves of Tony and Maria's romance, admonishes Maria to "be Home in 15 minutes", and then leaves the shop.  Tony and Maria then pledge their love among the<br />
shop mannequins.
</p><p>
Despite Tony's decision not to go to the rumble that night, Maria makes Tony promise to go and stop it.&nbsp; Tony agrees, despite knowing that his efforts to stop the rumble will have disastrous results.
</p><p>
That night, the Jets and Sharks meet at a deserted place under the West Side Highway for the rumble.&nbsp; After encouragement and support by their respective gangs, Ice and Bernardo begin to fight.&nbsp; Just as the rumble is getting underway, Tony arrives, ignores Riff's command for him to get with the Jets, and gets between Ice and Bernardo.&nbsp; He attempts to shake hands with Bernardo, and tries to assure both men that there's "nothing to fight about".
</p><p>
Thoroughly enraged at Tony's interest in his sister, Bernardo angrily pushes Tony away, slaps him around, roughs him up and insults him for his trouble.&nbsp; Despite Riff's warning Bernardo to cease and desist, Bernardo refuses.&nbsp; Losing patience, Riff hauls off and hits Bernardo.&nbsp; The forbidden switchblades appear and the two gangleaders, Riff and Bernardo,  begin the knife fight.
</p><p>
Just as Riff is about to decimate Bernardo, Tony, who has been held back by Ice and Tiger, breaks free and tries to stop Riff.&nbsp; Bernardo ultimately stabs Riff to death, and, Tony, to avenge his old friend Riff's death, stabs Bernardo.&nbsp; After a brief free-for-all, the Jets and Sharks, stunned by the killings,  flee the police and go into hiding, leaving behind Riff and Bernardo's bodies.&nbsp; Tony, in a state of grief and bewilderment,  calls Maria's name, until Anybodys appears and drags Tony away from danger.  The Jets, now led by Ice, and  hiding out in a garage, are advised to keep cool.&nbsp; Baby-John, the youngest member of the Jets, moved to tears by the killings, is comforted by his buddy, A-Rab.  Graziella, also moved to tears by Riff's death,  is comforted by Velma and some of the Jets.   Despite learning that Tony has killed her brother, Bernardo, Maria&nbsp; still loves Tony, who comes and hides out in her bedroom as she  prays that Bernardo's death&nbsp; not be true.&nbsp; Tony then advises Maria to meet him at Doc's Candy Store so they can elope together, and then exits out the bedroom window.&nbsp; Anita knocks on Maria's door, figures out that Maria has been hiding Tony in her bedroom, and severely upbraids Maria for allowing Tony to come near her.
</p><p>
Meanwhile, Tony has been found and sent over to Doc's by Anybodys, who has been spying around in the shadows.&nbsp; Learning that Tony is in love with Bernardo's sister and is presently being hunted by Chino, who is gunning for Tony to avenge Bernardo's death, Anybodys reports what she's heard back to the Jets, who are determined to protect Tony from Chino.
</p><p>
Meanwhile, Lt. Schrank stops by Maria and Anita's and questions them about the dispute that occurred at the dance the night before.&nbsp; Under questioning, Maria tells Lt. Schrank that she'd danced with a Puerto Rican boy named Jose.&nbsp; Anita, who has learned that Chino is hunting down Tony with a gun, warns Maria. <br /><br />
.&nbsp; At Maria's request, Anita reluctantly goes to Doc's Candy Store to warn Tony about Chino.
</p><p>
At the Candy Store, Anita encounters the Jets.&nbsp; Due to prejudices against Anita because of her cultural and ethnic background, and  their determination to protect Tony from Chino, the Jets refute Anita's appeals that&nbsp; she wants to help them protect&nbsp; Tony, and begin to&nbsp; harass and rough her up.&nbsp; Enraged,  Anita retaliates by spitting out the message that Chino has learned about Tony and Maria and shot Maria dead.
</p><p>
Meanwhile, Tony is still hiding in the cellar, awaiting Maria's arrival.&nbsp; Instead, Doc comes downstairs and relays&nbsp; the message that Anita has given him to give to Tony:&nbsp; that Chino has learned about him and Maria and killed her.&nbsp; Devastated by the message, a disbelieving Tony&nbsp; runs from the cellar into the street, calling for Chino to come get him too.&nbsp; Despite Anybodys warnings to Tony to leave, Tony refuses, continuing to call for Chino.&nbsp; Meanwhile, Maria appears and she and Tony fall, briefly, into each others' arms.&nbsp; Chino suddenly appears from behind a building and shoots Tony dead.&nbsp; Tony dies in Maria's arms.&nbsp;
</p><p>
The remaining Jets and Sharks,  who seem on the verge of clashing once again, are held back by Maria who intervenes, aiming at several Jets and Sharks with Chino's gun, but, overcome with grief, is unable to fire, and collapses on Tony's body.&nbsp; Loudly, Maria states the message that they all killed Bernardo, Riff and Tony with their hatred.&nbsp; Several Jets and Sharks converge to carry Tony's body off,&nbsp; united, at least for a fleeting moment, in understanding of tragedy.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Forces of Nature and Why People must Respect It:</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/11215" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/11215</id>
    <published>2007-11-03T15:07:45-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-11-03T20:50:41-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Home &#039;n&#039; hearth" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today, I'm taking a break from posting about Boston's politics to blog in something different. Here goes:</p>
<p>Much has been noted, and said about the force(s) of nature kicking back when people have shown little to no respect for it.  </p>
<p>Nature, I believe, is a very strange, if not intense and exciting phenomenom that frequently works in various, if quirky ways.  Nature can be beautiful, yet ugly.  It can be gentle and yet harsh.  Nature can also be calm, and yet it can also be tempestous, wreaking much havoc and destruction towards anything and/or everything in its path.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Today, I'm taking a break from posting about Boston's politics to blog in something different. Here goes:</p>
<p>Much has been noted, and said about the force(s) of nature kicking back when people have shown little to no respect for it.  </p>
<p>Nature, I believe, is a very strange, if not intense and exciting phenomenom that frequently works in various, if quirky ways.  Nature can be beautiful, yet ugly.  It can be gentle and yet harsh.  Nature can also be calm, and yet it can also be tempestous, wreaking much havoc and destruction towards anything and/or everything in its path.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, many people are neither  diplomatic enough or educated enough to show a certain amount of healthy respect for nature,  which has frequently led to disastrous results.</p>
<p>The devastation of Hurricane Katrina back in late August 2005 not withstanding, many, many people reside along the coastal areas here in the United States, or near large lakes, ponds, streams and rivers.  Having a magnificent view of the water is an especially beautiful, pleasant, and yet exciting/calming element.  This is especially true in the case of residing right by the ocean, which is particularly fascinating to watch as it changes from high tide to low tide, or vise versa in a matter of hours, or to see a calm, beautiful blue ocean in fair weather turn to dark or steely gray during a storm or when a storm is approaching.  The waves forming a huge wall of water, gradually increasing to peak into what looks like a mountain or hill of water, and then forming crests during high tide, only to break on the beach and then forming a somewhat scary-looking undertow  in calm weather during high tide,  can be fascinating to behold, and the roar of the ocean can have a mesmerizing, if not calming effect.  Even the ocean's wrath during a storm can be a thing of beauty and exciting to watch.  In short, the ocean is big, powerful and beautiful; yet it can also be extremely destructive.  </p>
<p>The  ocean can also be exciting to swim in as well, especially during high tide, when it's fun to swim out aways from shore, and then to allow oneself to be carried back into shore by the tide.  The ocean can also be quite invigorating, especially on a hot, sultry summer's day, but there's also the danger of occurrence of a rip tide, which can be quite nasty. Yet, a large lake, pond, stream or river can also be beautiful too, although none of them have the beauty, power, or spectacularness of the ocean.  The waters seem to lie placidly and calmly, reflecting the golden sunshine/sunset off of its small crests, and yet, the calm appearance of a river or lake can also be deceiving, as it can also mask dangerous cross-currents, eddies and whirlpools.  The sound of a stream coursing along down a mountain, or along a flat forest can be stimulating and calming at the same time, and the stream tends to sparkle in the sunshine as it moves along, and can even be wonderful for wading or fishing in. However, one also must take into account the age-old, but oh-so-true saying  "Water is a good friend but a lethal enemy."  Therefore, while water can be a pleasure to view, swim in and otherwise generally enjoy,  a certain amount of healthy respect for the water is an absolute necessity. </p>
<p>While residing near the water can and does have a great deal of advantages to it, providing much beauty and pleasure, there's also an extreme downside to it as well.  Bad storms at any time of year, especially along low-lying  and/or coastal areas, have frequently resulted in people's homes that are right smack near the water being compromised, if not partially or totally devastated by water damage, if not washed away altogether.  The erection of sea walls and/or levees in many low-lying and/or coastal towns, ostensibly to protect beachside homes and businesses  from being destroyed or washed away by water during a storm when flooding and/or flash-flooding can and do frequently occur, have done little to nothing to help matters any, and, if anything, have made them worse.</p>
<p>During the Blizzard of '78, which unexpectedly hit the Bay State with a demonic ferocity, many people residing in coastal cities and towns, whose homes were right by the water, had their houses just totally washed away.  Many people were also left stranded at their workplaces, in their cars on their way home, as well as being without power and/or heat, and many people residing in low-lying coastal areas had their  homes severely damaged or washed away altogether.  The same things also happened during the Blizzards of '93 and '96, only to somewhat lesser degrees, since the Bay State was better prepared and equipped to deal with the aftermath of the situations, unlike the Blizzard of '78.  </p>
<p>During heavy storms, people residing by rivers, lakes, streams and ponds have also experienced problems when such bodies of water have become extremely swollen by excessive rainfall, often resulting in flooding or flash-flooding, which has, in turn, resulted in partial or total destruction of their homes.  Street flooding, which has also resulted in the submergence of whole streets beneath the water, forcing people to go everywhere by rowboat, has also had disastrous results, such as expensive repairs, displacement and much heartache for people.  Yet, the   above-mentioned situations also present additional dangers as well.  Not withstanding the partial or total destruction and/or submergence beneath the water of homes that have been left standing, including mold, mildew and the leaching out of toxic chemicals into the water, which has been known to cause 2nd and even 3rd degree burns to rescuers, flood waters frequently harbor all kinds of dirt, garbage and deadly bacteria, increasing the dangers of and resulting in deadly diseases and infections.  The displacement of poisonous snakes and/or other dangerous swamp, pond, ocean, or even forest denizens has also resulted from extreme flooding in the wake of storms, sickening and/or killing many people.</p>
<p>Many, if not most of the above-mentioned situations cropped up during Hurricane Katrina, which hit the Gulf Coast, including New Orleans, LA and parts of Mississippi with an especially demonic ferocity and effectively drowned a once-vibrant and thriving city with many elegant old houses and other buildings that had been known for its many festivals,  clubs, bars and taverns that regularly hosted renowned jazz and blues players who regularly performed concerts in them, creating a real culture and nightlife enjoyed by many of New Orleans' residents, plus the renowned annual Mardi Gras celebrations.  Some low-lying Mississippi towns, including Biloxi, were totally wiped out.</p>
<p>Low-lying residential areas of New Orleans that had been working-class and/or African-Americans, notably the Lower 9th Ward, were now totally destroyed and underwater as a consequence of horrific flooding that resulted from the breaking of failed levees.  Houses were either severely damaged by the floods or washed away, and hundreds of thousands of people, mostly poor and/or African-American, were displaced, many, if  not most of the (former) residents never to return to their homes again.  Whole streets, docks, etc., were totally underwater, as were many businesses and residential homes. </p>
<p>The horrendous, horrific situation that came about in Hurricane Katrina's wake, however, was a direct consequence of several factors combined.  To begin with, New Orleans had been built roughly 20 feet below sea level.  Since around 1900, Louisiana has a long history of corrupt, inept politicians and politics.  Levees that were  built around<br />
low-lying levels of the city of New Orleans right by the water had never been built to withstand <b>extremely heavy</b> natural disasters such as Katrina.  <b>Moreover</b>, these levees have not been updated, maintained and/or reinforced like the should've been.   Hurricane Katrina, the <b>worst</b> natural disaster in the United States' history, compounded by the disgracefully inept, insensitive and irresponsible attitudes and responses to Katrina on the part of the G. W. Bush Administration, as well as by Federal State and local governments, was  also human-made.  Yet, the present flooding in Mexico, which has devastated an entire country, seems to top Katrina.  There's no question but that  the G. W. Bush Administration and the Federal government, however, alsoi contributed greatly to the devastation that Hurricane Katrina wrought .</p>
<p>Roughly 2, 000 people or more were killed or sickened by contaminated water, poisonous snake bites, and the inability of elderly and/or chronically ill residents to receive medical care, or medical care that was adequate.  Many babies and small children, for instance, were without diapers, food, milk, clothes or other necessities.  Diabetics and other patients with  chronic health problems  also ended up <b>without</b> insulin and/or other necessities.  All this being said,  had it not been for more than a hundred years of poor planning and design, as well as neglect on the part of local, state, federal and national government to fund, reinforce and regularly maintain and update the levees that broke during Katrina and devastated Mississippi's Gulf Coast as well as New Orleans and wiping some Mississippi towns totally out, and for the inept, insensitive and irresponsible behaviour on the part of the G. W. Bush Administration, especially in New Orleans,  the devastation wrought by Katrina would've been at least minimized.  </p>
<p>Our war on Iraq, too, has cost the United Sates much money, man/womanpower, not to mention the materials that are necessary for rebuilding housing, schools, etc., that are in decent enough shape to rebuild, and to replace housing, schools, hospitals, etc, that were totally destroyed or lost due to Katrina, as well as hospitals and schools, and, in general the entire infrastructure of new Orleans, thus enabling people to return to their familiar place of residence where they'd been their entire lives and loved.  I'd also say that several months' to a year's worth of money presently being spent on our war in Iraq could've/would've/should've been spent on rebuilding New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, generally.  Had not so much of our man/womanpower (i. e. the Coast Guard, National Guard, Army, etc.), been sent to Iraq to fight an illegal, immoral and unnecessary war, many more people could've been saved, and much property could've been rebuilt and replaced, and broken levees could've been fixed and re-inforced  and rebuilt as well.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, what's also happened is that people who've chosen to stay or return home have ended up living in FEMA trailers permanently, or have ended up with pre-fabricated houses that  contain and leach out  toxic chemicals that have proven extremely detrimental to people's health.  Again, the insensitivity, especially on the part of federal and national government, has played a huge, huge part  in this disaster, which is wrong.  <b>Moreover</b>, this is also an egregious example of government, on the federal, national and/or local levels having little to no respect or regard for people, the forces of nature and/or property.</p>
<p>Regarding less devastating water-related disasters in other parts of the country, I believe that there could've/should've been more done to reduce the risks to people who've taken up residence right by the water, and to reduce the losses, financial expenses, displacement and heartaches that can and do occur when heavy storms hit.</p>
<p>First of all, I believe that many mistakes were made when residences and/or businesses were built right close to the water in the first place.  Therefore, one can hardly blame the people residing in such housing today, since not enough was known in times past to forsee the possible consequences of the destructive qualities of water under adverse weather conditions.  That being said, I believe that more effort should be made to give Mother Nature her space.  Not builiding right smack near  bodies of water, but at least at a somewhat higher level above the water, if people still wish toi have their view of the water, would be a viable alternative.  This would take into account the desire for people to have a view of the water, as well as the need to provide a safe distance between residents and the waters, offering a certain amount of protection from the destructive effects of water gone awry in adverse weather.</p>
<p>In addition to that, stronger more durable levees could/should be built in low-lying areas that are near lakes, ponds, rivers and streams.  Regular monitoring, maintenance, updating and reinforcing these levees as needed is also an absolute necessity.  Very strong, heavy durable levees might also have to be built along low-lying coastal areas as well, if there is to be any kind of protection against the forces of nature.</p>
<p>As many more people decide to go camping and/or hiking out into unspoiled wilderness areas, or even take up residence in such areas, human vs. wild animal-incidents, as well as wild animal sightings on people's properties, in exurbs, suburbs, and even in cities alike, have also been on the increase.  Not long ago, coyotes were even sighted in the Jamaica Plain section of Boston, and even in suburban Watertown! </p>
<p>Other, more grisly events have abounded.  In many national parks around the country, including Montana's renowned Yellowstone National Park, for example,  Grizzlies and other bears were kept on exhibit in pens near picnic areas, while rangers lectured on their habits from behind the fences.  This, along with some people either feeding or petting the bears, in many instances, led to disastrous results.  "Not surprisingly, the bears soon lost their fear of humans and began to display dangerous, aggressive  behaviour."  As more and more people choose to go on camping/hiking trips well up into the mountains and therefore into wilderness areas that are frequently inhabited by bears,  bear-human incidents have increased, resulting in maulings, maimings or deaths.  Grizzly bears (especially grizzlies) and Black bears have been implicated in many, if not most of these horrific incidents.</p>
<p>At least three horrendous examples occurred back in the 1960's/early 1970's, two in Yellowstone National Park, one other incident occurred elsewhere.  On one of these occasions, a young man and a young woman who both worked at the park, decided to camp out under the stars one night.   Laughing and joking under the stars, they fell asleep at around half-past nine.    Three hours later, they were woken up by a Grizzly t hat had wandered into their camp.  The woman warned her companion to lie still and not move.  The Grizzly sank its teeth into the young  man's shoulder, then flipped him about 10 feet into the with its paw.  Then, the bear turned on the woman, biting her shoulder.  She screamed, and the Grizzly dragged her off down the hill.  While the young man survived, the young woman died of multiple wounds shortly thereafter.</p>
<p>Another horrific incident occurred in another campsite in Yellowstone National park that   was roughly 10 miles away, on that very same night.  Several young park workers also decided to set up camp that night.  Their experience, which had begun during the late afternoon/evening hours of the day, in some ways, was even more horrific.   During the late afternoon-early evening hours, an <b>extremely</b> scrawny <b>female</b> Grizzly<br />
bear had chased the campers into the water, eaten all their food and ransacked their gear.  Thoroughly scared, the young campers did not want to pack up and leave in the growing darkness.  </p>
<p>Unfortunately, that was just the beginning of a horrific night.  The Grizzly bear was close by and could be heard going on a rampage  through the woods in the vicinity of the campsite.  Hoping to deter the Grizzly bear, the campers built a huge, roaring fire and kept it going through the night, but to no avail.  At around 4:30 in the morning, the Grizzly bear charged into the camp.  All of the campers scattered and/or climbed trees in order to escape, with the exception of one unfortunate camper who, struggling with a stuck zipper in her sleeping bag, was unable to escape attack by the Grizzly.  In a moment, the unfortunate camper was heard to scream  "He's got  my arm off!!"    Then, her last words were  "Oh, god, I'm dead!"</p>
<p>In yet another incident, in a different place, in the early  1970's, a young couple who was out hiking in the mountains (I admittedly forget where this particular incident took place),  in which they, too were set upon by a rampaging Grizzly bear.  Although both of them survived the mauling by the Grizzly bear, they were seriously injured, and the young man was permanently disfigured.</p>
<p>Something more recent:  In the well-done documentary film <i>Grizzly Man</i>, which is about a man who had spent  the past 1 3 summers living up in the high parts of Alaska among Grizzly bears,  this same lack of diplomacy and respect for the force(s) of nature also backfired, and the man and his girlfriend met a rather tragic, horrible end....being eaten alive by a Grizzly bear.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this man not only got  very close to the grizzly bears, always feeding, petting and caressing them,<br />
but he also grew closer to the Grizzly bears than he did to people.  Toward the end of the film, many people who'd been interviewed expressed varying opinions, ranging from such comments as  "The guy deserved to be eaten", t o opinions, especially from a number of the Aleutians who'd lived in Grizzly country among Grizzly bears for many years and succinctly pointed out that "While it's unfortunate that the man and his girlfriend were eaten, it was also true that the man had crossed certain boundaries that <b>never, ever</b> should've been crossed."....getting<br />
<b>too</b> close to t he Grizzly bears, even though the Grizzly who'd eaten the man and his girlfriend alive<br />
<b>wasn't<b /> one of the Grizzlies that the man had befriended.  </b></b></p>
<p>Again, all of t he above having been said, there <b>are</b> things that people can do to prevent, or at least minimize the chances of incidents such as these arising.  For starters, paying attention to one's surroundings while hiking and/or setting up camp and camping is a good rule of thumb.  While camping and/or hiking, people should make sure that  whatever food is b rought  along is not left  out in plain sight, or is accessible to a hungry bear.  People should also avoid feeding the bears, as well.  If a bear  is hanging around a chosen campsite, the bear is probably <b>human</b>-conditioned.  In this instance, it's wisest  to pack up and vacate the campsite immediately, even though camp is all set  up, and to do so before dark and as fast  as possible.</p>
<p>As was mentioned earlier in this diary, there've been many instances of people feeding wild animals who've come around, and of wild animal sightings on people's properties, in their yards, as well.  (I once saw a red fox run across the road as I was bicycling out  in the quiet little rural town of Carllsle, MA.  When I told my family about it, they were skeptical, although they conceded that it was possible.)  </p>
<p>Many people have also insisted on having wild animals as pets, which, in many instances, has had disastrous results.  Many a captured wild animal has gone out  of control, on a rampage, wreaking much havoc, including damage to property, serious injuries, and even deaths to owners of such animals.  Many people have sensibly gotten rid of their untamed pets, turning them over to humane societies in their areas, which is the wisest thing to do.   People desiring pets are best off obtaining pets from a reputable pet store or breeder, who can dispense much useful info and advice regarding overall care, health, housing and other necessary info regarding pets.   Doing some research before buying a pet is also helpful.</p>
<p>While it's true that humans and animals do share the earth, and can and do co-exist at peace with each other, it's also true that a certain amount of distance between human beings and animals must be maintained in order for that to continue.  There are things that people can do to give Mother Nature her space and to show a healthy respect.  </p>
<p>In order to survive the elements, humankind must show some respect for the force(s) of nature by not building right smack near bodies of water, including the ocean, in low-lying and coastal areas that're particularly prone to flooding and/or flash flooding in adverse weather and/or heavy storms.  Granted, disaster can and will strike anywhere, but readiness is the best way to go, though it's not always that simple or even possible, especially in the wake of cyclones, earthquakes, or any other intense natural disasters that strike quickly and suddenly.    </p>
<p>If one must drive in adverse weather, being more careful and taking it slowly is the safest way t o  go.  Avoiding driving in extremely adverse weather, if at all possible, is the best recourse of all, however.  </p>
<p>All of the above having been written, I believe that humankind and nature <b>can</b> co-exist as long as a safe distance, accurate planning and a healthy respect for nature is maintained.   It 's also true, however, that average, run of the mill citizens alone are not to blame for the show of  disrespect  and lack of diplomacy regarding the force(s) of nature.  Poor planning,  design and construction on the part  of engineers and builders, as well as negligence by the government at the federal, state and national levels, is also indicative of the lack of respect for the forces of nature.   Again, better planning, designing, construction, as well as the maintenance of a safe distance between human beings and the forces of nature is the only way to ensure peaceful co-existence.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Jesus H. Christ, this is shameful!!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/9676" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/9676</id>
    <published>2007-07-20T19:19:17-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-07-20T22:28:31-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Boston's one of the brainiest cities in the United States, and in the world, and only blogs such as <b>this</b> can be and are produced, that're totally intolerant of different styles of posting, and people who disagree with them.  A lot of you transplanted midwesterners on here are so anxious to blend in and act like  so-called "true" Bostonians/Bay Staters, that you come off as being <b>exactly</b> what you are---<b>outsiders</b>!  It's no wonder that a lot of the true local yokels around here really can't stand you!  Sometimes, I wish you'd go back to the midwest,  where ya came from--and stay  there!!</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Boston's one of the brainiest cities in the United States, and in the world, and only blogs such as <b>this</b> can be and are produced, that're totally intolerant of different styles of posting, and people who disagree with them.  A lot of you transplanted midwesterners on here are so anxious to blend in and act like  so-called "true" Bostonians/Bay Staters, that you come off as being <b>exactly</b> what you are---<b>outsiders</b>!  It's no wonder that a lot of the true local yokels around here really can't stand you!  Sometimes, I wish you'd go back to the midwest,  where ya came from--and stay  there!!</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Michael Moore&#039;s new documentary film, SiCKO!  Well Worth seeing, imo!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/9588" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/9588</id>
    <published>2007-07-15T14:26:36-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-07-15T14:26:36-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Entertainment" />
    <category term="health care" />
    <category term="Movies" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Recently, at the Coolidge Theatre, I saw Michael Moore's new documentary film, <em>SiCKO</em>.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Recently, at the Coolidge Theatre, I saw Michael Moore's new documentary film, <em>SiCKO</em>.</p>
<p>What a mindblowing documentary that was!  This great documentary, which shows  a disbelieving Michael Moore himself inteviewing healthcare givers, patients and their families, and other people from countries such as Britain, Canada, Cuba, France and, of course, the United States, reveals a stark and startling difference between the United States' healthcare system (which is the most fucked-up health care system in the Western world, btw), and the <strong>free</strong> healthcare that Britain, France and most, if not all of the European countries, and Cuba, too, give to their citizens.  </p>
<p>The film SiCKO also showed how some seriously ill or injured people who lived near enough to the Canadian border ended up going to Canada for help and getting the healthcare that they needed, in contrast to some parts of the United States, where necessary tests and other procedures were denied to people--all in order to save money.  This movie also showed, however, that there <strong>were</strong></p> some healthcare system workers who had a conscience and described, some tearfully, of the denials that they were compelled to mete out to patients, who were either seriously incapacitated or died as a consequence of that action. 
<p> Because our healthcare system wanted to save money on such people:i. e. a couple of examples:  (A)  A woman who turned out to have a brain tumor, but died, because she was denied a test and therefore a procedure that could've/would've saved her life, and, (B)  A woman whose husband suffered from kidney failure and was found to have a brother with a perfect match for a kidney donation.  The family was let down, because the woman's husband was denied the operation--a kidney transplant that could've/would've saved his life, and her husband died as a result, leaving the woman and two young childlren.</p>
<p>In one instance, a woman who couldn't pay her healthcare bill was dumped at the curbside by the hospital to which she was admitted.  Imagine that!!</p>
<p>As much as I love the United States, this is yet another dark side to our country.  If our country can spend <strong>so</strong>  money on invading other countries for nothing, then why can't we give free healthcare to all our citizens?  </p>
<p>All of the above having been said, the film <em>SiCKO</em> should be seen.  It'll scare some people's socks off, but it's well worth it.  The fact that even FOX NEWS praised it says something right there, imo.  Although it's by no means a perfect film, it's gotten people stirred up....and talking.</p>
<p>Strongly recommended.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bicycling:  An Enriching Pleasure:</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/9365" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/9365</id>
    <published>2007-06-28T09:49:16-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-06-29T01:44:37-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sports" />
    <category term="exercise" />
    <category term="Physical Fitness" />
    <category term="Recreation" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As someone who's been a bicycling enthusiast since childhood, I  now own two bicycles:  A ten year old 21-speed mountain bike for biking around town to do errands, go on appointments, etc around the city, and a 5 year old 27-speed Fuji Touring bicycle, which is used exclusively for long-distance rides out in the country.  My long-distance country bike rides are mainly done on the weekends, in the good weather, but, on occasion, I  do them on weekeday mornings, too.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As someone who's been a bicycling enthusiast since childhood, I  now own two bicycles:  A ten year old 21-speed mountain bike for biking around town to do errands, go on appointments, etc around the city, and a 5 year old 27-speed Fuji Touring bicycle, which is used exclusively for long-distance rides out in the country.  My long-distance country bike rides are mainly done on the weekends, in the good weather, but, on occasion, I  do them on weekeday mornings, too.   In the winter, and when the weather's rainy, or too hot or too cold, however,  I have my stationary bike, which I try to use for at least a half hour during seasons/days when I don't ride on the road.</p>
<p>While using the stationary bike is certainly <strong>not</strong> the same as riding outdoors,  on the road,  it's better than nothing when it comes to the wintertime, or for rainy or extremely not  weather, when I retreat to the shelter of my A/C'ed apartment.</p>
<p>Bicycling, whether it be for recreation or for commuting to and from work, appointments, errands, etc., is a tremendous pleasure, as well as being beneficial to the heart, body and overall physical and psychological well-being.  Whether one bicycles in the city <strong>or</strong> out in the country, especially nowadays, a certain amount of vigilance and defensiveness is required:  In the city, one has to be on the lookout for pedestrians, cars turning, people in parked cars opening their car doors, and, especially during the morning/evening rush-hours, one also needs to be especially careful of drivers going home from work who're clearly anxious to get home, have had a nip or two before heading home from work, etc.  One way I deal with this, if drivers seem especially nervous and upset, is to pull over to the side, wait for a break in the traffic, and then resume my riding.</p>
<p>If there's a red light, I'll use a pedestrian walk light to ride through the intersection whenever possible, hence avoiding the crowd of cars and getting a head start.  To make a left turn, if there's a great deal of vehicular traffic, I'll do  this particular maneuver as a pedestrian, whether it be here in the city <strong>or</strong> out in the country.</p>
<p>Anyway, Saturday was a gorgeous day here in the old Bay State, so I went on a 15-mile bike ride,  The route I did has some moderately steep, long hills, as well as gently roilling terrain.   Hence the "granny" gear, as the smallest front sprocket on my touring bike is called, comes in handy.  For gently rolling terrain terrrain and/or straightaways, the middle to upper gear ranges come in equally handy.    Oh, for having lots of gears to use!</p>
<p> For my long-distance country bike rides, I drive out to Concord Center, parked, and ride my favorite 12-15 mile route, through Concord, Carlisle, and some of Chelmsford.  Even when going along at a moderately fast clip, hunkered down on the drops (the lowest position of the handlebars), I still find time to observe the now-green countryside, now lush with leaves and flowers.  Since Mother Nature  has cloaked everything in green for right now,  it's there for all to enjoy and appreciate.  On nice days, many others have the same idea as I do, and I frequently see other bike riders out on the roads.  </p>
<p>For long distance country riding, I like the feel of the dropped handlebars--they cut down on wind resistance, I get a chance to really lean over into the wind and stretch my upper body, and  I feel like I'm soaring along with a sense of power and control.  Yet, at the same time, there's still time and opportunity to look around at what Mother Nature has provided, and to appreciate the beauty.  If the green woods could talk, what stories they could tell!!</p>
<p>Now, since I use bicycles with both the dropped handlebars (I also love the way they look, btw), and the flat,  upright handlebars, I'm well aware of the advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages to both:<br />
In the city, the flat,  upright handlebars, not to mention the fatter, knobbier tires and heavier frame that a mountain bike has to offer, are far better, I think, for commuting in city traffic, and the fatter, knobbier tires are far better for commuting on Boston's streets, which can be pretty nasty.  The flatter, upright handlebars and the fatter, knobbier tires aren't so great for touring, since one can't bend forward into the wind to cut down resistance and gain speed, and the fatter tires are also not conducive to  really gaining momentum and speed.  </p>
<p>Dropped handlebars, on the other hand, are perfect for that.  Since there are also three different positions on the dropped handlebars:(up on top, riding over the brake hoods, and down on the drops), there's also the advantage of being able to adjust one's whole upper body and hands as one wishes.  I take full advantage of this, moving my hands into the three different positions on the dropped handlebars, which givese me lots of advantage.  I can take off and gain some speed--hunkering down on the drops, hence really gaining some momentum.</p>
<p>Of course, however, with a touring bike, which has a thinner frame and wheels, one has to be more careful of bumps, potholes, etc, which can and do come up even while riding on roads out in the country.  The touring bike, imo, is really <strong>not</strong> good for city riding.</p>
<p>All that being said, I cherish riding both of my bicycles, and riding both in the city and in the country.  Bicycling is something that I've been doing with much relish since childhood.  When I was very little, I had a tricycle.  Then, I got a two-wheel bike with coaster brakes and training wheels,  when I got to be a good enough and confident enough rider, were removed.  I road my one-speed bike with coaster brakes from transition through the summer before entering the  4th grade. </p>
<p>In fourth grade, I got my first geared bike for my birthday, which I still remember  to this day:  a 3-speed Raleigh bike that my parents had even stenciled my name on.  I rode that bike all through the 5th and sixth grade.  After that, I got another, better 3-speed Raleigh bicycle, which was sturdier.    I used to enjoy riding my bikes to school during all those days, even when I went to high school, which was the next town over from the one I grew up in.  Those were the days when bikes weren't ripped off so readily, and I managed to get by with a skimpy little combination lock chain, with which I'd lock my bike to a tree in a wooded area behind our high school.   I rode the green Raleigh  3-speed bike through high school, too. </p>
<p>A year after graduating high school, I wen ton an 8-week hosteling bike trip through Europe, for the summer.  I was already to have my 3-speed Raleigh bike overhauled for the trip, to take along.  The bike store manager, however, recommended that I get a 10-speed bike because I'd be much happier and more able to ride to ride long distances on the trip, and he was proven right.  I got my first advanced bicycle for my trip to Europe--a 10-speed English Dawes Realmrider bicycle, with dropped handlebars,  which, although somewhat big for me, I rode for 20 years....yup, you read right.....<strong>20</strong> years!</p>
<p>In the early 1990's, I got an even better, more advanced bike...a 21-speed Japanese Bridgestone RBT road and touring bike, also with dropped handlebars.  The old 10-speed Dawes was left up in the house in Vermont that my parents had for awhile but was sold shortly before my dad's passing.  Well, I rode that Bridgestone bike to and from work in Cambridge while in my present residence, but that was a somewhat heavier, tougher bike.  Bridgestone pulled out of the American market for whatever reason, and, when my Bridgestone bike really began having other issues, and parts could no longer be obtained for my Bridgestone R-BT bike, after 11 years of good use, I knew it was time to move on to other things.</p>
<p>My latest advanced bike is the 27-speed Fuji Touring Bike that I now have, which I enjoy tremendously.  My mountain bike is a cheap bike, which I only use for here in the city, and therefore don't worry as much about its getting stolen, even though I enjoy it.</p>
<p>Living in a high-theft area, it's necessary to secure bicycles as best as one can, and obtain the best locks too.  When one or both bikes aren't in use, I keep them stored on a pole-cat rack in my apartment.</p>
<p>Both of my Raleigh 3-speed bikes, as well as my one-speed coaster brakes bike were girl's  bikes, with upright handlebars.  Now, for the past 30 some-odd years. I've thought nothing of riding  bikes with the bar going across the top, since it's stronger.  Anyway, I'll be doing more bicycling this summer.  Bicyclling in  early to mid fall is rather pleasant, too, weatherwise, when Mother Nature teases the beholder with beautifully colorful leaves and the nippy crisp air that's frequently prevalent during the autumn months.  The disadvanteges, however to bicycling at that time of year are as follows:  One must be more careful on the roads, since the presence of many fallen pine needles, pine cones, acorns and leaves can and do present a potential hazard that could lead to spills.  It's also true that many of the "leaf peepers" are out in their cars and aren't always so careful.  I've survived by being  careful, taking care of,  and enjoying  myself.</p>
<p>One of the things I do is to make sure that I take a bottle of water <strong>and<strong> a bottle of cranberry juice along on my long distance bike rides, which is helpful.  Whether I bicycle in the city or the country, I always, without exception, wear a helmet for protection.  One can take a nasty fall, at any time, anywhere.  </strong></strong></p>
<p>I believe that anyone, with rare exceptions, can learn to ride a bicycle.  My mom admittedly regrets not having learned to bike ride as a young girl.  My brother and sister also bike ride on occasion, although not as enthusiastically or often as I do.  Having a good bike shop to go to also helps, but one must make sure that s/he buys fits properly. <strong>That</strong> is of utmost importance in purchasing a bicycle!!  There are many  wonderful books and magazines to do research on bicycling, which provide much useful information regarding purchasing, types of bikes for different lifestyles, budgets, etc., how and where to ride, and upcoming riding events.</p>
<p>I live in the city, which I love, and I also love having the best of both worlds:  Living in the city and visiting the country is my cup of tea.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Calculated Risks:  A somewhat different question.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/8672" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/8672</id>
    <published>2007-05-07T18:39:37-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-07T18:39:37-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of calculated risks,  assuming that it's true that most people are decent, "normal" and honest, why is it that hitchhiking, or even picking up a hitchhiker, is as risky as it is?  Why do people now hitchhike so seldomly, if at all these days?</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of calculated risks,  assuming that it's true that most people are decent, "normal" and honest, why is it that hitchhiking, or even picking up a hitchhiker, is as risky as it is?  Why do people now hitchhike so seldomly, if at all these days?  There's ample reason for that, imo, and it's not just something that's the result of fearmongering through the media; the risks are real.  There's no telling who one may get picked up by.  Horrible incidents can, do, and have happened.   In any case, it's not just recently that the situation with hitchhiking started to get bad.   The situation was already bad 35-40 years ago. </p>
<p> As somebody who was a teen during the 1960's, and a young adult during the 1970's, I was well aware of what was happening, even though I didn't participate in a lot of the stuff that went on back then.  Although I did occasionially hitchhike as a younger adult, and had no trouble, I'd often end up worrying and wonder if I'd get to where I was going, and in one piece.  Back in the mid-1970's, for instance, there was a whole slew of young women, here in the Boston area, who were never seen or heard from again after hitchhiking.  <strong>Moreover</strong>, these were tough, independent,  young  women who really knew how to get around--and ended up dead.   In fact, Boston was in the national spotlight for a number of weeks, in part, because of that. </p>
<p>Imho, there's something about our whole society and culture that<br />
makes hitchhiking as risky as it is, and many, if not most of the horrendous incidents that've occurred while hitchhiking fail to even make the papers, or the news, for that matter.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Blizzard of &#039;78---Memories:</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/8495" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/8495</id>
    <published>2007-04-24T03:03:21-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-24T23:13:03-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Boston" />
    <category term="Weather" />
    <category term="crisis" />
    <category term="unity" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I remember the Blizzard of '78 as if it were yesterday.  I was then attending Boston University's (now-defunct) Program in Artisanry, continuing on with my studies in metalsmithing, which, as everyone here knows, I love, and living downtown in a Boston University Dormitory.   Since I was living downtown,  I didn't have to worry about getting around or being able to get my schoolwork done when the Blizzard of '78 hit.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I remember the Blizzard of '78 as if it were yesterday.  I was then attending Boston University's (now-defunct) Program in Artisanry, continuing on with my studies in metalsmithing, which, as everyone here knows, I love, and living downtown in a Boston University Dormitory.   Since I was living downtown,  I didn't have to worry about getting around or being able to get my schoolwork done when the Blizzard of '78 hit. </p>
<p>   Later on, in the dormitory, my dormmates and I watched rather scary things on the evening news;  people being horribly stranded in their cars and not able to get home from work, or wherever, and people were even stranded <strong>at </strong> their places of work.    Some patients who needed medical prescriptions of some kind or other were helped out by others,  who helped these patients procure their necessary prescriptions. People ended up buying soap, toothbrushes, and whatever, due to being stranded&nbsp; at their school or workplaces.</p>
<p>The day the Blizzard of '78 hit had started out like an ordinary day.   A snowfall was predicted, but nothing nearly as big as it was going to turn out to be later on.   I was still working in the metalsmithing studio at the school, along with a number of other people.   As tiime went on, the forecasts became somewhat more ominous and urgent.    As the snow arrived and began falling thicker and faster, it became clear that this was not going to be just one of our usual snowstorms. </p>
<p>   It was clear from the satellite patterns, and from the fact that people were having a tougher-than-usual time driving and walking around, and that this was going to be a much worse, and much more intense snowstorm than they'd been predicting earllier.    The snow dumped a total of roughly 3 feet on the whole state of Massachusetts.   When it finally stopped snowing and the sun came out, it was a rather festive time for everyone. The whole state of Massachusetts had been effectively shut down.</p>
<p>Since then-State Governor Michael Dukakis had declared a state of emergency in the entire Bay State, nobody was allowed to drive, except emergency vehicles, i. e. police, state, fire, snow-removal vehicles, and ambulances.   It was actually a big test for everybody: the elements vs. humankind--bigtime!   Since nobody could drive, it seemed that pretty much <strong>everybody</strong> was out walking or cross-country-skiing around the city!   It was actually a very festive time, especially since no cars were allowed on the road. </p>
<p> Classes at B. U., including the Program in Artisanry, which I was attending,  were also called off for that entire  week.   Since I was living downtown, I also spent lots of time in the metalsmithing studio and got a lot of work done.   Walking around the city was fun--I also met up with some friends of mine from an outside-the-university class that I was taking.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, huge pieces of snow-removal equipment had to flown in from the Mid-West, and, all over the city and state of Massachusetts generally, people were busy digging out, and the snow was being put into great big trucks and hauled away in huge, huge trucks.  There were some mountains of snow near some college dorms in the city, including B. U.'s,  and many people were having fun, climbing on them, having snowball fights, etc.   It proved that people, in a crisis, are quite capable of pulling together, which,for a short while, they did. It seemed like one large community out there during this time.</p>
<p>I admit to one thing, however;  as much as I love my family, I was happy to be living downtown, being able to have access to the studio and getting work done, and not having to worry about getting around, since there was public transportation and I could go on foot if need be.   Had I been living at home, which was then Lincoln, MA, out in the suburbs, I admittedly would've been more nervous, tense, and worn everyone in my family out, because I admittedly do get that way if and when I feel too confined and not in control of things.   Anyway, this whole thing passed, and things eventually returned to normal, for which everyone was more than grateful.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Mandantory School Busing Here in Boston:</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/8476" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/8476</id>
    <published>2007-04-22T15:33:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-27T08:34:56-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Boston" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="blockbusting" />
    <category term="busing" />
    <category term="housing" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Although mandated school busing here in Boston was implemented for a reason, I <em>firmly</em> believe that, for a number of reasons,  it did noit work out the way it was intended.  </p>
<p>It's a known fact that, for many years prior to mandated school busing, the all-white Boston School Committee had violated the Racial Imbalance Law in the most mean-spirited, egregious fashion, deliberately keeping de facto segregation of the Boston Public Schools intact.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Although mandated school busing here in Boston was implemented for a reason, I <em>firmly</em> believe that, for a number of reasons,  it did noit work out the way it was intended.  </p>
<p>It's a known fact that, for many years prior to mandated school busing, the all-white Boston School Committee had violated the Racial Imbalance Law in the most mean-spirited, egregious fashion, deliberately keeping de facto segregation of the Boston Public Schools intact.</p>
<p>As a result of many years of deliberate intransigence on the part of the Boston School Committee,  the Federal Courts were compelled to intervene, taking much tougher measures than would've otherwise been taken, which, in turn led to increased racial/ethnic polarization, an increase in the already-high student school drop-out rate, and increased flight from the city and/or its public schools</p>
<p>Initially, the NAACP in Boston  had not wanted a Federal Court Lawsuit, due to costs and expenses.  However, because of the Boston School Committee's deliberate,  flagrant  violation of the Racial Imbalance Law, and because of the constant intransigence of the Boston School Committee, the NAACP felt that there was no other recourse to be taken.</p>
<p>Although there was always much racism in Boston, age-old, pre-existing racial tensions and hostilities in Boston went soaring way, way up over the top at the start of busing.  There was much rock-and-bottle throwing, beatings, assaults and even stabbings and shootings, especially directed against black students being bused into Boston's  white workingclass ethnic neighborhoods, particularly Southie, Charlestown and East Boston.</p>
<p>Although much of the white workingclass opposition to and active resistance to mandated school busing was defintely motivated by racism, the issues were also socioeconomic in origin.  Many of Boston's whites, particularly in Southie, Charlestown and East Boston, were as poor as the blacks in Roxbury, Mattapan and North Dorchester.  They, too had been hurt by airport and highway expansion, which encroached on and sliced through those neighborhoods, as well as urban renewal polilcies gone awry.  Many of the workingclass whites had also witnessed the complete and total destruction of Boston's old West End neighborhood, which was replaced by large, not-so-attractive highrises, as well as the ghettoization of the Jewish neighborhoods of Mattapan, Roxbury and North Dorchester by unscrupulous blockbusting tactics and were concerned about preserving what they had left, fearing that they "might be next".</p>
<p>Black students being bused into Boston's white ethnic enclaves, especially Southie, Charlestown and East Boston were regularly subjected to verbal <em>and</em> physical abuse, as were the mostly white and Irish-Catholic Tactical Patrol Police Firce, who had been assigned to maintain order in the affected areas of Boston when busing came in, and, so were ordinary people residing in the above-mentioned white neighborhoods who attempted to comply with the court order in some way or other.</p>
<p>Boston's white neighborhoods, and later, the black neighborhoods in retaliation (though to lesser extents than in the white areas of the city), erupted with a fury that rivaled that of many of the Southern areas (i. e. Alabama, Mississip, etc)in the wake of mandantory school busing.  </p>
<p>Although the black community had opted to have their children bused into Boston's white ethnic neighborhoods,  including Southie, Charlestown and East Boston, many blacks were afraid to enter the high schools in the areas to which they'd been assigned, doing so with much trepidation, and, in some cases, refusing to, precisely because of the verbal and <em>physical</em> abuse that they were routinely subjected to.</p>
<p>Having said all of the above, I firmly believe, that with a different kind of leadership, and with more foresight on the part of people who were involved with urban planning, things would've been very, very different.</p>
<p>As guilty as the all-white Boston School Committee back then was of many years of malfeasance, they were by no means alone in perpetuating de facto segregation in Boston.  Roughly a month  after MLK's assassination, in May 1968,  the B-BURG (Boston Banks Urban Renewal Group) Program, which was ostensibly for the purpose of helping low-income first-time black homebuyers to break out of the ghetto and achieve the responsibility of home ownership for the first time, came in and was announced.  B-BURG was a consortium of some  20 Boston-area banks that operated in partnership with the real estate agents.  What happened, however, was nothing less than a disaster.</p>
<p>The Jewish neighborhoos of Boston were chosen for the B-BURG program, citing resistance from the other white ethnic neighborhoods nearby.   The Jewish neighborhoods were "redlined", hence restricting<br />
black homebuyers to those particular neighborhoods.  In a number of instances, FHA (Federal Housing Admn)-insured loans were denied to black homebuyers who'd found decent housing just afew blocks outside the B-BURG lines.  Far from helping people to break out of the ghetto, B-BURG had merely enlarged, expanded and reinforced it.</p>
<p> As the "redlined" neighborhoods tipped, most of the Jewish population fled, their flight fueled, at least in part, by irresponsible and racist campaigning: unscrupulous real estate agents frequently warned Jewish families to "sell and get out now, before property values declined", and many other threats.  With the advent of threats, arsons, break-ins and firebombings, pre-existing white flight from the "red-lined" neighborhoods, now increased in earnest, creating an overcrowded, crime-ridden ghetto that still exists today.</p>
<p>I firmly believe that had the B-BURG program been administered differently, hence allowing black homebuyers access to  housing throughout the city of Boston, Boston's neighborhoods <em>and</em> public schools alike would've been much more integrated, and the Boston school system in much better shape today, with better schools for both non-white and white Boston school students alike.</p>
<p>There would've been a much beter chance of neutralizing the all-white Boston School Committee's stance, hence derailing LDH's crusade, and appealing to the <em>better</em> instincts of Boston's white workingclass and elilminating the need for a far-reaching mandated schoiol busing program that clearly  created furthur polarization in Boston along the lines of race and class and made many people still more angry and fearful of each other.</p>
<p>Instead, the all-white Boston School Committee lost no time in riding on the coattails of white workingclass frustrations and resentments along the lines of race, class, etc, and played to their worst fears.  All of the above having been said, however, even though there's always been much bigotry in Boston's white workingclass ethnic neighborhoods, I question whether or not the bigots were necessarily in the majority.  Perhaps not.</p>
<p>However, assaulting, namecalling and throwing rocks, etc. at busloads of schoolchildren certainly didn't help, and were certainly  not conducive to people working together to solve the problems.</p>
<p>I believe that, with a different kind of leadership, Boston's white workingclass neighborhoods would've been amenable to integrated neighborhoods and schools alike, and much of what  took place back then could've been minimized, if not prevented.  </p>
<p>I firmly believe that the intransigence of the all-white Boston School Committee back then, coupled with the condemnation of the people residing in Boston's white workingclass enclaves as racists per se by many people in the all-white suburbs, as well as badly  thought -out<br />
urban renewal plans and a poorly-designed and poorly-executed busing plan that had come about as a result of many years of malfeasance and recalcitrance on the part of the Boston School Committee, all set the stage for much of the conflict and racial/ethnic strife that went on in the city of Boston back then.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Question:</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/8470" />
    <id>http://www.universalhub.com/node/8470</id>
    <published>2007-04-22T01:04:34-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-22T01:05:20-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>independentminded</name>
    </author>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As a new member of this blog,  how do I go about just simply emphasizing and/or boldfacing just one particular word without emphasizing or boldfacing every word in the sentence or whatever?  I have decided against capitalizing the letters of a word or words that I wish to emphasize in my posts, because it looks too much like shouting over the internet, and it more than likely puts a lot of people off.   Would love some advice on how to go about it.  Any thoughts or suggestions?</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As a new member of this blog,  how do I go about just simply emphasizing and/or boldfacing just one particular word without emphasizing or boldfacing every word in the sentence or whatever?  I have decided against capitalizing the letters of a word or words that I wish to emphasize in my posts, because it looks too much like shouting over the internet, and it more than likely puts a lot of people off.   Would love some advice on how to go about it.  Any thoughts or suggestions?</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
