Hey, there! Log in / Register

Haha, it's funny because all black presidents eat watermelon, amirite?

Watermelon cartoon in the Herald

This is today's Herald editorial cartoon. As Greg Reibman writes:

Would it have been so bad to just say "peppermint" or "bubblegum"?

UPDATE: The Herald has issued a sorry/not sorry statement:

As Jerry Holbert discussed on Boston Herald Radio this morning, his cartoon satirizing the U.S. Secret Service breach at the White House has offended some people and to them we apologize. His choice of imagery was absolutely not meant to be hurtful.

We stand by Jerry, who is a veteran cartoonist with the utmost integrity.

For the full interview click here.

Gwen Gage
Spokesperson
October 1, 2014

Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Let's make a racial issue where one doesn't exist. Awesome.

P.S. Everyone loves watermelon.

up
Voting closed 0

Clearly they're appealing to their targeted readership demographic.

up
Voting closed 0

Sarah Palin uses watermelon douche.

up
Voting closed 0

I thought the cartoon was suggesting that the intruder was a racist, and - judging by his insane rapeface - mentally ill. "Watermelon" isn't exactly racist subtext; it's straight up racist text.

up
Voting closed 0

Are you suggesting that the Herald might actually be willing to acknowledge that there are people out there who dislike the president due to racism?

up
Voting closed 0

I guess; I just refuse to believe that the cartoonist would A) not realize the racial connotation, or realize it and think they were being sneaky with something soooooooooooo obvious, or B) put effort into drawing and coloring a cartoon without an actual joke in it. It's lame either way, but the intruder saying something racist is at least wacky and edgy in a "shock value" sort of way. Changing it to "raspberry" reminds me of watching Blazing Saddles on regular cable, where almost none of the sanitized jokes make any sense.

EDIT: After reading the author's excuse of "finding his kid's watermelon toothpaste", I guess I must accept that the dude is both not funny and really, really dumb.

up
Voting closed 0

Look at all these people twisting themselves into a pretzel trying to convice us that it's not racist. Really? Go post in the herald comment section complaining about the "PC police" with all the rest of the dying breed of people that still actually read the herald

up
Voting closed 0

It doesn't matter if it's racist or not. That shit-can "news"paper used that word for one reason- the editorial staff are indeed bigots, and they're not afraid to own it. And a lot of pathetic loser Bostonians think that's ok.

up
Voting closed 0

Watermelon is a waste of farm real estate. Flavourless crap.

up
Voting closed 0

the stereotype does indeed exist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watermelon_stereotype

So let us pretend it does not exist. Awesome.

up
Voting closed 0

Some Guy on the Internet has declared that it Isn't Racist! Therefore, it is not possible that it is racist.

Gee, we can all just move on now. Some Guy on the Internet is always right about these things, you know.

up
Voting closed 0

We're in that delicate season when Some Guy on the Internet (a) has to make it clear that the Washington R******s football team name is just a word and it's meant to honor and how could anyone possibly be offended by mere words, while (b) simultaneously gearing up to scream at the first clerk in a month or so to wish him "Happy Holidays"

up
Voting closed 0

The Fighting Irish, Kansas City Chiefs, Atlanta Braves, Cleveland Indians, San Diego Padres and so on are acceptable.

"If you're not offended, you're not a Liberal."

up
Voting closed 0

"If you're not using bad corollaries, you're not a Conservative."

up
Voting closed 0

Tom & Jerry is deemed a racist cartoon by Amazon Prime.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2776323/Amazon-adds-classic-Tom-...

up
Voting closed 0

Old Tom-and-Jerry cartoons are chock full of dated racist stereotypes. You can't watch an episode with the (lower half) of the black maid without seeing what is essentially animated minstrel show material.

The real question is, why would you ever object to letting people know that ahead of time? The racism existed at the time. It was played up for laughs in the cartoons. Nobody is deleting it, because it's important to keep the material complete and to recognize the times in which the cartoons were made. But who is harmed by letting potential buyers know that the horrendous content exists among the classic cartoon material?

What do right-wingers have against full disclosure or informed purchasing?

up
Voting closed 0

I wonder if it has anything to do with the dated caricature that is Tom's owner...

up
Voting closed 0

All of those are groups of people, but none of those are racial slurs. And the fighting irish is the mascot of an irish catholic school, so a little different than a white guy owning a team whose name is a racial slur.

up
Voting closed 0

told by liberal MA public schools teachers that the word "Indian" was derogatory. Maybe that was a 90's thing!

up
Voting closed 0

it is inaccurate at the least, since we aren't talking about people from India.

up
Voting closed 0

... in Jamaica Plain.

No further comment needed, I believe.

up
Voting closed 0

Oh, so one example of a term (no doubt chosen because the larger culture didn't know any other term at the time) means that that's THE one valid term for all eternity? Tell me, did it hurt very much when you removed the top of your skull and sprayed on the lacquer to keep anything from ever changing?

up
Voting closed 0

... and they said they really have no problem with the term "American Indian" -- which means something slightly different from "Native American" (which includes Aleuts and Eskimos). It is a useful collective term, which has little resonance, as most individuals primarily identify with their tribe, and not with any sort of generic Indian-ness,

Any reason why your basic attitude in this forum so far has been so hostile?

up
Voting closed 0

I suspect those who bring up Notre Dame in an effort to invalidate arguments against Indian mascots are doing the same thing–if a White ethnic mascot exists, then charges that Indian mascots are racist can be dismissed. It’s a false form of equalizing because it ignores the lop-sidedness of the “equality” (the tiny number of non-Indian racialized mascots compared to the number of Indian ones) and the role of systemic inequality (that American Indians are underrepresented at colleges and universities and face racial discrimination in a way that Irish-Americans do not). And it also serves to discount opponents’ voices by saying that if any social group wouldn’t be opposed to a particular type of portrayal or treatment, then no one else has any right to be offended by it, either, regardless of their different histories, treatment, or social positions.

http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/05/notre-dames-fighting-iri...

Native Americans fight against the idea of all Indian mascots. The Redskins is particularly damaging because of the fact that it meant the scalped head of a Native American that the government paid people for. Can you see how this is different than the word Brave or the Chiefs?

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/news/redskin-name-update

up
Voting closed 0

Kansas City Chiefs, Atlanta Braves, Cleveland Indians

All three of these have been protested by Native American groups and their supporters (especially the particularly racist logo of the Indians).

up
Voting closed 0

They dropped Chief Wahoo this season. It's just the block "C" now.

up
Voting closed 0

Don't forget these Irish, 69th Infantry Regiment (New York)

The 69th Infantry Regiment is an infantry regiment of the United States Army. It is from New York City, part of the New York Army National Guard. It is known as the "Fighting Sixty-Ninth",[1] a name said to have been given to it by Robert E. Lee during the Civil War. An Irish heritage unit, as the citation from poet Joyce Kilmer illustrates, this unit is also nicknamed the "Fighting Irish", immortalized in Joyce Kilmer's poem "When the 69th Comes Home" .[2] Between 1917 and 1992 it was also designated as the 165th Infantry Regiment. It is headquartered at the 69th Regiment Armory in Manhattan.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/69th_Infantry_Regiment_(New_York)

up
Voting closed 0

Chief Wahoo is pretty much the most racist mascot avatar I can think of, for sure.

up
Voting closed 0

n/t

up
Voting closed 0

Deleted due to comment deletion.

up
Voting closed 0

Comment deletion.

up
Voting closed 0

When some guy on the internet dismisses something important like a well known racial stereotype as being non-existent, I feel compelled to comment.

up
Voting closed 0

If some guy on the internet is always right, and another guy on the internet says he isn't; which one is guy is right?

up
Voting closed 0

The one with the higher post count, duh.

up
Voting closed 0

Everybody move on! Some Woman on the Internet (i.e. SwirlyGrrl) has declared this a non-issue. Some Woman on the Internet is always right about E.V.E.R.Y.T.H.I.N.G.

up
Voting closed 0

They make it all the more amazing that you missed the point.

up
Voting closed 0

It would only be racist if he suggested fried chicken tooth paste.

up
Voting closed 0

This lends a little more credence to it being a racial issue:

https://twitter.com/steveannear/status/517316330123706368/photo/1

up
Voting closed 0

And it was changed to 'raspberry' in other media for this reason.

up
Voting closed 0

It was watermelon orginally. Herald didn't think anything of it but the national syndicate did and asked to change it to raspberry.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2014/10/herald_c...

On its face, the cartoon seemed racist to me but his explanation of where he got watermelon makes total sense and I think it really was just an unfortunate coincidence.

up
Voting closed 0

I use cinnamon flavored myself , when I can still find it.
Crest Complete Multi-Benefit Gel, + Whitening Cinnamon Expressions
$4.79
Walgreens.com

up
Voting closed 0

Only a few more in the entire comic.

Google might have been the cartoonist's friend ...

up
Voting closed 0

Who the fuck are you to decide whats offensive and what isn't? How would you know, ARE YOU BLACK?

up
Voting closed 0

When was the last time you heard of watermelon-flavored toothpaste? Please, if you want to delude yourself, by all means have fun with it, but don't think others are so foolish as you.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm sure that the White House keeps a stock of white robes on hand.

BTW, Boston Herald, the intruder wasn't one of your white teacracker friends, but a mentally ill army vet of Hispanic ancestry ...

up
Voting closed 0

He was an IMMIGRANT who SHOULD NOT BE HERE but OBAMA WANTS TO TAKE AWAY OUR JOBS.

Oh, he's a sick vet? Well, OBAMA HATES VETERANS AND DESTROYED THE VA BECAUSE HE WANTS TO SEE THEM SUFFER.

See? It's easy to turn absolutely everything into a pointless condemnation of Obama without any understand (or concern) for the real facts. Between that and complaining about lack of travel lanes and parking I don't know how they get though the day.

up
Voting closed 0

It's pretty racist of you to read "hispanic ancestry" and assume "immigrant".

See? It's easy to find racism everywhere if you look hard enough.

up
Voting closed 0

The fence jumper wasn't white.

up
Voting closed 0

Calling a hispanic a "fence jumper"? That's a paddlin'.

up
Voting closed 0

And? Do you think all non-whites are one happy group of people that can't be racist toward one another? I hate to say, but that assumption is quite ignorant, or at worst, pretty racist.

up
Voting closed 0

Ask a Dominican about how he/she feels about Haitians!

up
Voting closed 0

Hispanic is an ethnicity, not a race. I haven't seen where the fence jumper identified as "Black Hispanic" or "White Hispanic" or "Native American Hispanic".

up
Voting closed 0

I still don't see what is so offense about black people liking watermelon. Most people like watermelon.

up
Voting closed 0

That's your problem.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm aware the stereotype has a long history, I just maintain that it shouldn't be offensive. It's not calling you stupid, its not calling you an ape, it's not saying you are responsible for your own poverty, it's not accusing you of being violent....it is saying you like a food that most people like. Get over it and point to real examples of racism. Ever hear the story of the boy who cried wolf?

up
Voting closed 0

Actually, if you bothered to read the link posted immediately above your post, you might learn that there are a lot of dehumanizing, denigrating aspects to this particular stereotype. But of course, you wouldn't want to do that, since it might involve learning something bad about white people.

up
Voting closed 0

the funny thing is that you think hand-wringing over bullshit actually fights racism as opposed to encouraging it

up
Voting closed 0

How does pointing out racism "encourage" it?

This should be good.

up
Voting closed 0

it encourages racism because all those racists have to come out and defend their views!

up
Voting closed 0

Touche!

up
Voting closed 0

"shouldn't be offensive" is a nonsense term. How can you actually say that after claiming to be aware of the history of the stereotype?

up
Voting closed 0

Please see my original post.

up
Voting closed 0

Particularly seeing that this cartoon is directed at the Secret Service and not Obama. But hey its 2014 and everything is racist, sexist and over sensationalized.

up
Voting closed 0

"Hey it's 2014 and Conservatives don't want to hear about how racist and sexist their policies anymore."

up
Voting closed 0

That is an over reaction. Not everything is racist, et. al. But stereotypes can be racist, such as in this case. There is enough historical precedent to back it up.

up
Voting closed 0

We're totally in a post-racial America! We got a black President, so we're all good now, right?

up
Voting closed 0

"we sincerely regret if we inadvertently offended anyone and extend our sincere apologies."

Either apologize or don't.

up
Voting closed 0

"Don't worry, Mr. President! I'm not a member of ISIL."
"No wonder Michelle's arms look so great. This soap is amazing!"
"I'd salute you, Mr. President, but we both have something in our hands right now."

up
Voting closed 0

From the Herald online:

Holbert claimed he came up with the idea to use watermelon flavor after finding “kids Colgate watermelon flavor” toothpaste in his bathroom at home. “I was completely naive or innocent to any racial connotations,” Holbert said. “I wasn’t thinking along those lines at all.”

http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2014/10/herald_c...

I personally find this VERY hard to believe.

up
Voting closed 0

And the first thing I thought was "man, that cartoonist f-ed up royally."

My second thought was "has some company actually started making watermelon flavored toothpaste, thus making this a thing?"

I would like to think this was an innocent mix-up, but Holbert and the Herald need to do a big mea cupla on this one regardless.

up
Voting closed 0

http://www.colgate.com/app/Kids-World/US/Kids-Products/Ages-8-12/2-in-1....

I'll pass on both. Really a dumb idea to make (essentially) candy flavored toothpaste. (I'm assuming it tastes more candy-ish than geneuinely fruitish -- no intent to sammple either flavor -- now mango or peach....).

up
Voting closed 0

The flavoring encourages tooth brushing. Seriously, every morning when I brush, I give Waquiot Jr. a toddler toothbrush with a drop of something from Oragel that's baby safe. Sometimes it's an effort to get it out of his mouth he likes it so much. There's a flavor, I think bubble gum.

However, if the cartoonist used strawberry or whatever, then the point of intruders getting by Secret Service personnel and into the Presidential Residence (which is what happened) would be the point, hence the royal SNAFU due to what I like to chalk up to boneheadedness.

up
Voting closed 0

> Sometimes it's an effort to get it out of his mouth he likes it so much

Kids can (and have) gotten pretty sick from earting a whole lot of toothpaste that tasted too yummy. For many years, tooth paste makers focused on ways too make tooth paste appealing to kids in ways other tasting too candy-ish. It seems like they have gone back to creating products that can easily be over-consumed by not yet clue-ful little kids.

up
Voting closed 0

Not a reason to not have bubblegum toothpaste.

Note also that there are people who are allergic to mint - does that mean that nobody should have mint toothpaste?

My teens still dislike the strong mint flavor and prefer the less-kiddy sublime vanilla mint and the orange flavors. Kind of ridiculous that mint dominates anyway.

up
Voting closed 0

This is where it gets odd. It is some kind of training toothpaste. It has less of the stuff that we grownups use, which means it is safer. Eventually, he will be using the fluoride (or whatever) toothpaste, when we will actually have to watch him (he isn't in the bathroom when he uses it now) to make sure he isn't doing anything bad. Right now, it is about teaching good dental habits. In a year, it all gets serious (and he gets to play with cooler toys, but that is another thing.)

Adults use mint flavored toothpaste for the taste. As long as there isn't sugar in it, I'm cool with anything. Kvn was mentioning cinnamon toothpaste. That's an interesting combo.

Yeah, and once again, something should have clicked when the syndicate asked the cartoonist to change it to raspberry. Honestly, I would take watermelon toothpaste over raspberry, but I'd had to try them first. Also, I am not the first African-American President of the United States.

EDIT- and to what swirls said, all of this is out of his reach.

up
Voting closed 0

Colgate does make a watermelon flavor kids toothpaste. Kids toothpaste comes in all kinds of weird flavors. If that's what he had in his house, I imagine he associates it with his kids, rather than a stereotypical food used to denigrate African Americans.

Too bad he doesn't use Tom's of Maine. Then he could have used "Silly Strawberry". I'm pretty sure I have a spare tube from when the Sprout grew out of it before we used the last tube in the stockpile.

up
Voting closed 0

... (not especially) "plausible deniability".

Anyone familiar with Holbert's prior Obama caricatures?

up
Voting closed 0

Colgate doesn't run ad campaigns with black kids encouraging them to try the new watermelon flavor! Because they're not tone deaf to reality.

up
Voting closed 0

If it's a kids' toothpaste flavor, why is it plausible to have an adult suggesting it to another adult in the cartoon? Sorry, too thin, won't hold water.

up
Voting closed 0

Let's assume he did it because there's a half-empty bottle of Colgate in his house right now.

He also said this: "I didn't think people thought like this anymore -- I am just thinking about the flavors, and I love watermelon," Holbert said. ( http://www.wcvb.com/news/i-just-like-watermelon-cartoonist-says-of-obama... )

That right there tells me he was not naive to the history of pickaninny/watermelon racism. And at that point, he knows damn well the context of what he's writing and choosing to ignore it because "nobody thinks like that any more". Of course, that's a total bullshit statement. You think a political cartoonist wouldn't know about photoshops of Obama holding big slices of watermelon or as a witch doctor and all sorts of other racist imagery using Obama as the foil from the past 6 years?

Then on top of that, nobody at the Herald vetted it the same way his syndicate did and told him to change it for their purposes too? And when his syndicate told him to change it, he specifically decided not to inform the Herald of that change or replace their version for them?

He knew what he was doing with the Herald. They knew what they were doing in running it.

up
Voting closed 0

Thanks for sharing that link. I only became aware of the watermelon and fried chicken stereotype a few years ago myself, so I may have bought this guy's BS if you hadn't posted that.

up
Voting closed 0

Right. Well said.

up
Voting closed 0

Why do you find this so hard to believe. What in this man's past leads you to believe he is lying? You don't WANT to believe so thats on you.

up
Voting closed 0

Read the other comments. People have explained repeatedly why this is implausible. Are you unable to read or simply unwilling to admit that there's racism going on here?

up
Voting closed 0

Colgate Kids 2 in 1 Toothpaste and Mouthwash Watermelon Flavor
$3.59
Walgreens.com

Colgate 2-In-1 Toothpaste And Mouthwash Kids Watermelon 4.6 oz
$3.47
Family OTC

Colgate Kids 2 in 1 Toothpaste and Mouthwash, Watermelon Flavor, 4.6
$3.99
Drugstore.com

Its a thing alright...........

up
Voting closed 0

VOID DUP double tap

up
Voting closed 0

At what point in time will it be OK to mention watermelon and black people together?

Oops! I just did it. Damn. I guess I'm a racist.

Suldog
http://jimsuldog.blogspot.com

up
Voting closed 0

We got here after at least 110 years of using it as a dog whistle for racism, let's give it a 110 year rest and then we can re-evaluate. Sound fair?

up
Voting closed 0

Seriously. When a kid acts anti-social all day and then wants to get out of timeout after 30 seconds, what do you do? "Hahahaha. No."

up
Voting closed 0

a crummy cartoonist but he'll get lots of attention out of this. Maybe that's what he wants.

up
Voting closed 0

(including UHubbers) for reacting to an OPINION cartoon by crying "racism" and giving him that attention.

up
Voting closed 0

The old "the only people that are causing trouble here are the people who are pointing out an issue" nonsense.

Otherwise known as "shoot the messenger". I realize that is old school behavior around here, but it isn't and never has been effective problem solving.

up
Voting closed 0

... even if I find the message of his recent work pretty one-dimensional and stupid. If one looks at what he did when he first went to work for the Herald, it was more varied (even if also generally pretty right wing in nature).

up
Voting closed 0

By making such a big deal of it, the racism itself is perpetuated, not minimized, because those who like to use such idiocies as weaponry are empowered to do so again rather than being given the thought that their actions are not having the desired effect.

Discuss?

Suldog
http://jimsuldog.blogspot.com

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, let's not call out racism or discuss it at all. Then we can return to those glorious peaceful days of the 1900s - 1950s when the races lived in harmony and nobody complained about anything.

"Boy the way Glenn Miller played..."

up
Voting closed 0

That people who call out racism must be the real racists. It . . . well, it stinks.

up
Voting closed 0

.. are you a Jack Vance fan? Because I don't think I've ever seen "perruptor" used anywhere else.

up
Voting closed 0

That's worked for years - for people who don't give a crap and don't want to be bothered to do anything at least. Phoebe Prince and others - not so much.

up
Voting closed 0

"By making such a big deal of it, the racism itself is perpetuated, not minimized"

That's like saying that by pointing out and treating an injury, you're making it less likely to heal. In other words, it's complete nonsense.

up
Voting closed 0

If you believe physical injuries are comparable to discomfort brought about via uses of language, then you have a point. I don't believe they are - sticks and stones, etc. - so I believe your analogy is faulty.

You're certainly entitled to your opinion, though, and I did ask for discussion. Now I'll continue the discussion by giving you my feelings on the matter.

I was prejudiced in my first viewing of the cartoon because I had already been told it was racist, so when I saw it I thought, "Yeah, the word 'watermelon' sure wasn't a good choice for the flavor of the toothpaste." However, I did not immediately consider the cartoonist to be some evil son of a bitch. I assumed it was an unfortunate and unthinking choice. There are quite a few folks who don't automatically associate watermelon with a derogatory view of black people.

If I was an editor and had that cartoon presented to me, I certainly would have asked for the flavor to be changed. If I drew the cartoon, I certainly wouldn't have used that flavor because I know the sort of backlash it could cause.

BUT, I still believe racists are empowered when they see how many they can upset with such otherwise normal everyday words. This is not the n-word, which is intrinsically vile. "Watermelon" is only powerful when someone clutches their pearls; otherwise it is just a fruit or a flavor.

Obviously, the mileage of many here varies. I truly believe, though, there will be a lot less hate and hurt when we defuse words rather than try to censor them.

Suldog
http://jimsuldog.blogspot.com

up
Voting closed 0

The Herald is a dying newspaper. It's easy to accuse them of racism, because that's what they promote. From Laurel Sweet making a point in a story on the court appearance of an offender that had to mention that he was "a practicing Muslim", to Howie Carr's daily racist screeds where he refers to blacks as "layabouts and 40 oz drinkers",to this disgusting cartoon.

Now, it's easy to go off on the editors of the Herald but they understand who they're peddling to. Old white people over the age of 60 who live in Randolph or Southie who remember when black people knew their place and there was only one Muslim family on the block that everyone gossiped about but no one actually talked to.

The Herald is a disgusting rag because they pander to the ignorant, who I used to pity for not being taught better, but now I just spend time actually wallowing in their comment section pointing out their ignorance when I'm on a long job and I'm bored. And they don't like it one bit.

So fuck em.

up
Voting closed 0

"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs. There is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don't want the patient to get well." -- Booker T. Washington

Booker T. had it right over a century ago. Comical to watch Emily Rooney's Greater Boston segment on this issue tonight as she fretted with a guest who has donated thousands to Democrats and far-left causes. "They don't want to lose their jobs," exactly.

up
Voting closed 0

... worked really well at NOT achieving even a scintilla of equal treatment for the vast majority of black Americans.

up
Voting closed 0

Of the old days when you and the boys used to score blow at Lanes Lounge. Or how you persuaded Ed Brooke to run. Or how you stood in front of that crowd on Bunker Hill Street yelling at the buses "nigger go home" and said "Enough!".

Tell us about those days, willya?

up
Voting closed 0

Never scored blow dvdoff, but proudly made many arrests for Distribution of Class B. I assume you'll conclude the designation of cocaine as class B under the Massachusetts General Laws is some code for black? Massachusetts Republicans are quite proud of Ed Brooke, now in his 90's, retired in FL, the first black elected to the US Senate since reconstruction.

Your Democrat party has never come close, with the exception of sometimes "person of color" Elizabeth Warren. No, I never protested busing. Too busy joining hundreds of other conservative Boston, MDC and State Police (both black and white officers) in ensuring Judge Garrity's ill-advised court order was enforced. Keep trying though, you'll get it right some time. Your provocative use of "nigger" adds a special touch. Your word, not mine. Really shameless.

up
Voting closed 0

I was quoting from my own experience during that time, so you'll forgive me if I doubt you were in Charlestown if my use of the word was "provocative".

And I'll bet the word was bandied a lot more amongst you and your co- workers a lot more than it was bandied about at my place of employment.

up
Voting closed 0

Wow.

Just wow.

up
Voting closed 0

Swirly, sorry that that a historic black American like Booker T. Washington offended your blackness/white guilt by using the word "colored" which is still used by the NAACP, btw. You should get on that after freeing the bike lanes.

up
Voting closed 0

Good lord.

A lot of people used the N-word a long time ago, too - so you can use that as a white guy in 2014, by that "logic"? In your subject line?

Mmmm ... okay. Oh, and hey, tell us more about the evil conspiracy that is Agenda 21, while you are peddling the crazy here.

up
Voting closed 0

A white feminist liberal highly offended that an iconic black figure used the word colored and his quotation was cited, verbatim, years later. Oh, the humanity!

up
Voting closed 0

SwirlyGrrl, I would like to believe that you are simply not aware of who is Booker T. Washington (or W.E.B. DuBois with their historically famous debate). That quote was made over a hundred years ago. Pretty sure that word was considered more than socially acceptable rather than its connotative implication if used today.

But looking at your response to O-FISH-L, you dismissed it still because the word is not acceptable. So quoting in verbatim from major figures cannot be used if it had such words? Seriously?

On top of that, you used the "wow, just wow" line. A line people uses as an example of spuriousness of arguments made by Millennials. A line I can imagine you would harp on as a fault of our generation, but you just used it. Again, seriously?

Booker T. Washington, along with W.E.B. DuBois, were two intellectual giants in the debate on equalizing society post-civil war. Both sides had strong and understandable arguments between the idea to rise up economically first then gain political equality (perhaps with the economic leverage - though there is a more "submissive" interpretation of his arguments) versus gaining political equality then gaining economic (with argument it was not possible to gain economically until political sphere was fixed first).

With understanding of context. One should not dismiss the entire point because the quote had words that would not be used in such a way today. It's a quote, quotes are suppose to be exact wording of what was said.

up
Voting closed 0

Mr. Washington represents in Negro thought the old attitude of adjustment and submission; but adjustment at such a peculiar time as to make his programme unique. This is an age of unusual economic development, and Mr. Washington’s programme naturally takes an economic cast, becoming a gospel of Work and Money to such an extent as apparently almost completely to overshadow the higher aims of life. Moreover, this is an age when the more advanced races are coming in closer contact with the less developed races, and the race-feeling is therefore intensified; and Mr. Washington’s programme practically accepts the alleged inferiority of the Negro races. Again, in our own land, the reaction from the sentiment of war time has given impetus to race-prejudice against Negroes, and Mr. Washington withdraws many of the high demands of Negroes as men and American citizens. In other periods of intensified prejudice all the Negro’s tendency to self-assertion has been called forth; at this period a policy of submission is advocated. In the history of nearly all other races and peoples the doctrine preached at such crises has been that manly self-respect is worth more than lands and houses, and that a people who voluntarily surrender such respect, or cease striving for it, are not worth civilizing.

In answer to this, it has been claimed that the Negro can survive only through submission. Mr. Washington distinctly asks that black people give up, at least for the present, three things, —

First, political power,

Second, insistence on civil rights,

Third, higher education of Negro youth,

— and concentrate all their energies on industrial education, the accumulation of wealth, and the conciliation of the South. This policy has been courageously and insistently advocated for over fifteen years, and has been triumphant for perhaps ten years. As a result of this tender of the palm-branch, what has been the return? In these years there have occurred:

1. The disfranchisement of the Negro.

2. The legal creation of a distinct status of civil inferiority for the Negro.

3. The steady withdrawal of aid from institutions for the higher training of the Negro.

- W.E.B. DuBois

up
Voting closed 0

... and Washington was wrong (no matter how well intentioned).

But that doesn't stop racists from yearning for the return of compliant blacks who know and accept their (very much) lesser place. Things were just so much nicer before those people got so ... pushy.

up
Voting closed 0

I think the word you were looking for is "uppity".

up
Voting closed 0

what in holy hell does that have to do with this cartoon? Do you genuinely believe that it's just African-Americans in the racial-grievance-exploitation business that are horrified and offended by this sickening bit of buffoonery?

Want to find some people who don't want the patient to get well? Try the so-called journalists who pander to the old-school racists that read the Herald. Besides local sports coverage, feeding that disgusting red meat to that dying breed is all that sorry rag has left.

How unsurprising that the usual Uhub suspects line up to defend something as grossly, patently, obviously racist as this. I'd say you ought to be ashamed, but we all know that ship sailed, hit a reef, and sunk to a deep, deep ocean bottom long ago.

up
Voting closed 0

Misread

up
Voting closed 0

Wasn't there some evidence that the intruder was indeed a racist...someone who wasn't happy that we had a black President?

The words in the cartoon are coming out of the mouth of the intruder....

Let's not get too excited here....

up
Voting closed 0

As I said up above, do you really think the Herald would acknowledge that people dislike the President due to racism?

up
Voting closed 0

Such as him being "progressive" and even worse, a Democrat? Would they have given Hillary Clinton an easy time? John Forbes Kerry?

Don't get me wrong, there are definitely people who dislike Obama because his is black (although he is white, too, but that is a whole other thing), but there are people out there who do actually care about his politics, and don't care for politics like that to begin with.

And there are people who are concerned that a guy with a knife got into the Presidential residence. Too bad that additional poor oversight allowed this cartoon to become the bigger issue.

up
Voting closed 0

Of course there are people who dislike Obamas policies, which is fine, the question is why conservatives continue to focus on his race or background in their criticisms, instead of the policies. And this is not an issue of poor oversight, the cartoonist was notified by other editors of the problem with the cartoon and that they were changing it, but decided to keep the Herald version as is. He knew what he was doing, either at first or when he was told the context, and moved forward with it. And there is no way the editors at the Herald, which publish racist, sexist, homophobic articles daily didnt know what they were doing. It was intentionally racist because that is their demographic, old angry white men. Sure, it will drive up Herald readership, but it hurts Boston's business climate by sending a message that 'others' are not welcome here. Patrick denounced it, hopefully Baker or another prominent republican will, but I am sure that the Herald will continue with their racist articles from Howie and all.

up
Voting closed 0

the question is why conservatives continue to focus on his race or background in their criticisms, instead of the policies

The birther movement is small and has been shrinking for 5 years. Race comes up when race comes up (Gates, Martin, Brown), but from the government takeover of health care to killing off the coal industry while not allowing Keystone to go forward to a feckless foreign policy, the right have been able to find material. They don't want to impeach him because he is black any more than the left wanted to impeach Bush because he was white (both sides wanted to do it because they are morons who don't understand what an impeachable offense it.)

Honestly, other than that racist fringe, which is very small, the right has been policy driven in their criticism. The irony on this underlying issue is that it is about keeping the guy they hate safe.

up
Voting closed 0

No, there was no evidence of that, there was evidence he was mentally unstable. More to the point, the cartoonist said he had no idea watermelon had any racist connotations, he claims it had nothing to do with race, so he could therefore not have been making a comment about the right wings unhappiness of having a black president. It is valiant of you Lou though, to try to squirm and squint to defend the racists at the Herald, though I wonder why.

up
Voting closed 0

I am amazed at how many people are defending this racist cartoon, but with the vitriol that has come out of republicans/conservatives since Deval was elected and even more so when Obama, I shouldn't be. I hope Baker will repudiate in no uncertain terms the Heralds publication of this cartoon, but since the Herald and the people who defend this type of racism are his biggest backers, I wont hold my breath.

up
Voting closed 0

deliver the most effective messaging to knuckle dragging wing nuts. Its visual and it has big bold print.

up
Voting closed 0

if only we can get 110 outraged posts next time some kid in Mattapan gets shot or a pizza delivery guy gets murdered for a free pizza and pocket change. That would be real progress.

BTW: I love, love watermellon....and fried chicken...and I'm white. I even use to smoke Newports.

up
Voting closed 0

How about Tisei? All I can ever think of is the grief Barney Frank got, not just for his political stance, but for his sexual orientation from the Herald, and Howie Carr in general. How does Tisei feel about the conservative voice of the state also permitting, and at times encouraging anti-homosexual garbage?

up
Voting closed 0

I take it (by your obsession with "The Baker Demographic") that no one in the "Coakley Demographic" requires your attention, you automatically assume.

up
Voting closed 0

The "Coakley demographic", i.e. Patrick voters, have voiced their disgust at the cartoon and Patrick himself denounced it.

But not Baker.

People like you, the Baker demographic, seem to defend the racism.

up
Voting closed 0

You seem to make a lot of assumptions: "People like you, the Baker demographic, seem to defend the racism."

What's "People like you"?
You know me? You know which candidate I plan on voting for? Now I'm defending racism?

Your talents would be useful, you're wasting them here.

up
Voting closed 0