DA: Armed career criminal out on bail robs and shoots Mattapan resident while carrying cocaine in his pocket
A Dorchester man with a criminal record stretching across eight pages was arraigned yesterday on charges he held up a man inside a Blue Hill Avenue apartment, then shot the victim before fleeing - right into the arms of police, who had arrived to investigate a motorist's report of gunfire, the Suffolk County District Attorney's office reports.
Dorchester District Court Judge Kenneth Desmond set Christopher Freeman's bail at $100,000 - prosecutors had asked for $250,000 - on charges of home invasion, armed robbery, armed assault with intent to murder, unlawful possession of a firearm, trafficking in cocaine, and three counts of unlawful possession of a firearm. However, Desmond agreed with prosecutors to revoke Freeman's bail on an outstanding larceny charge in Ayer.
Because of his status as an armed career criminal, Freeman could get at least 15 years in prison if convicted, the DA's office reports.
According to prosecutors, Freeman, 42, robbed a 24-year-old resident of 1443 Blue Hill Ave. around 9 p.m., Friday, then shot him in the arm. Police arrived in time to see Freeman walking out of an alcove in the rear of the building:
They ordered him to raise his hands. The man uttered an expletive and complied.
"I didn't shoot no one," Freeman allegedly said, unbidden.
The officers handcuffed and frisked Freeman. In his pockets, they recovered two large wristwatches, a bag that contained more than 14 grams of cocaine, about $2692 in cash, and a cell phone.
A short distance away, in the area of the alcove Freeman had been leaving, officers recovered three handguns: a Beretta semiautomatic loaded with three rounds, a Casco semiautomatic loaded with six rounds, and an empty Titanic revolver.
According to the DA's office, the money belonged to the victim. When detectives interviewed the victim at Boston Medical Center, they asked him for his cell-phone number. One dialed it - and the phone seized from Freeman began ringing at the Blue Hill Avenue location.
Innocent, etc.
Ad:
Comments
What the hell is wrong with
What the hell is wrong with these judges? Reducing $250k to $100k on an criminal like this? Good that he revoked it completely, but why the reduction?
The way I see it,
judges often reduce bail to appear they're giving the defendant a break. They can get away with this stunt, even in cases like this one, because the prosecution can't appeal the judge's decision to disregard their recommendations.
Now, if judges upheld (or increased) the recommended bail amount, that would almost always result in an appeal from the defense for a bail reduction.
How do we correct this nonsense? Simple - we need to give the prosecution similar rights of appeal in bail and sentencing decisions that the defense has enjoyed all along. We also need to require judges to put the rationale for their reduced bail and sentencing decisions on the public record for the taxpayers to see.
For the record - I am not a lawyer, nor have I ever played one on TV
Perfectly reasonable
Perfectly reasonable response, actor that's played a laywere on tv.
Laywere?
Is that a lawyer that turns into a layperson at a full moon?
Bad day.
He must have been having a bad day, and I am sure the rain didn't help him feel cheerful.
Does this guy honestly desserve to be part of our society?
I sure don't feel so. Drop him off way out in the ocean.
With a brick tied around his
With a brick tied around his feet. He can go whale watching on the way down.