Hey, there! Log in / Register

At least one MIT student calls for an end to the school's annual sodium drop

Update: Even though I recently got a new eyeglass prescription, I obviously can't see well, because I missed the fact that Halle wrote his plea 10 YEARS AGO, rather than as a reaction to the recent burning of five people by sodium (watch this year's MIT sodium drop). But that says something as well ...

Michael W. Halle writes in the MIT Tech that it's time for MIT students to grow up and stop dropping sodium bars in the Charles:

.. Today, society increasingly stereotypes scientists as people who act without regard to consequence. Behind every toxic waste dump is someone who thought it wouldn't matter, or did what had always been done before. The Sodium Drop exactly fits the stereotype, albeit on a smaller scale. At MIT, we're supposed to be different. We're supposed to be the ones who can think for ourselves, who relish breaking the status quo when it becomes outmoded. The tradition of the Sodium Drop has become just that: outmoded. I ask that those who organize it find an alternative and equally alluring tradition that doesn't sacrifice the quality of the fragile river environment that is MIT's backyard.


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

so, not exactly a response to current events.

up
Voting closed 0

I noticed the date myself, but I think the sentiment is still valid. Halle was looking ahead.

When you think about it, the Charles River Swimmers probably don't appreciate the annual Sodium Drop, either.

up
Voting closed 0

"I noticed the date myself, but I think the sentiment is still valid. Halle was looking ahead."

Sounds as if he was. Good for him.

up
Voting closed 0

So they've been doing this for at least a decade now and finally it caught up with them and five people had to suffer pain so they could watch things go boom.

But, yeah, I should read dates more carefully (I saw "Sept. 5" and stopped looking).

up
Voting closed 0

Joe Dwinell at the Herald also writes about the letter in the present tense.

Looking again at the page, I see the problem: It says:

Last published Sept. 7, 2007

Underneath which is the actual date of the letter. The top date refers to the most recent issue of the Tech, I guess. Not the best UI choice ...

up
Voting closed 0

after I posted a similar comment there to what I posted here.

up
Voting closed 0

Here's hoping that M. I. T. comes down hard on the students involved in this horrific activity and puts a
halt to this practice once and for all! Progress can't be set back just because a handful of people think it's fun to drop sodium into an already-polluted river that's in the process of being cleaned up and the ecosystem balance in the process of being restored.

up
Voting closed 0

...until someone[s] get hurt.

Then people crawl out of the woodwork for the sole purpose of cutting you down.

Many university traditions have died this way - they go on for years and years without notice. But of course the mentality of modern society is such that we all have to /feel/ like we did our part in something, and so the moment a mishap occurs, people jump on the bandwagon and yell and scream for the sole purpose of chest-pounding and that sensation of taking action, while nothing actually occurs.

And that is enough in our litigious, lawyer-driven society to shut down many traditions.

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, it is nice that the MIT kiddies never managed to cause first-degree burns in people on the other side of the river before. Now that we know their fun can result in paramedics watching their gloves melt on their hands, I say too bad: Find some other way to blow things up that doesn't involve risks to innocent people.

If the MIT kids like seeing things blow up so much, why not set up a tank of water to drop the sodium in at the Stata Center or inside the Infinite Corridor or even - and this would truly be a blast - inside the nuclear reactor?

Well, scratch the last one - that might involve non-MIT people getting hurt.

up
Voting closed 0

I may be wrong, but isn't that reactor cooled with sodium on the nuke side?

up
Voting closed 0

See here.

Here is an example of a sodium-cooled reactor.

up
Voting closed 0