Hey, young adults, why are you so turned off by the news media?
By adamg - 11/25/07 - 10:13 pm
Let me know by Dec. 4. That evening, I'll be on a panel discussing "Plugged In, Tuned Out: Young Adults and the News Media" - to which MassInc graciously invited me even after I told them I am, alas, no longer a young adult (except when compared to, say, the reporting staff of "60 Minutes").
Want to attend? It's free, starts at 6:30 p.m. at the Back Bay Events Center, Dorothy Quincy Suite, 180 Berkeley St.
Dan Kennedy, who knows something about both the media and young people (being a professor at Northeastern these days and all) is also on the panel, along with Dante Ramos, deputy editorial page editor at the Globe and WBUR reporter Bianca Toness. Adam Reilly of the Phoenix will moderate and there's a "networking event" afterwards. More info, including how to RSVP (you Facebook types can go here, instead).




Comments
I'm older than you. Can I still attend?
By Ron Newman - 11/25/07 - 10:40 pm
Sure
By adamg - 11/25/07 - 10:40 pm
I don't think they'll be reverse carding at the door. You are supposed to RSVP, though (at the link above).
I did a quick survey
By Rhea (not verified) - 11/25/07 - 10:51 pm
of some 20- and 30-somethings in my office about why they don't read the newspaper. It was very enlightening. I wrote it up on my blog. Maybe take a look at that. http://www.thegeminiweb.com/babyboomer/?p=1326
Well!
By Seraphic Single (not verified) - 11/25/07 - 11:00 pm
Look at you in your fame! Tell them all that The Youth of Today are disgusted and disenchanted with the print media, and that everyone is now his/her own news editor, and we only read the Globe and the Post on-line, the Globe for the headlines, and the Post for the fun scandals, like the MIT LED-shirt girl and the sleazy Boston College Law student who posed in ripped Superfan Ts and black bikini bottoms.
the Post?
By Ron Newman - 11/25/07 - 11:02 pm
The Boston Post has never been online, having gone out of business in 1956. (Before even I was born.)
Whoops!
By Seraphic Single (not verified) - 11/26/07 - 3:43 pm
Sorry. ItwaslateIwasdrunkI'vebeenoutoftownformonthsIcan'tREAD! I meant the Herald.
You don't have to be a young adult
By SwirlyGrrl - 11/25/07 - 11:24 pm
Heck, I'm on top of the hill and I can understand why people get a bit disenchanted with "local" news that is 30% hollywood reporting about celebrity indiscretions, yet blurs out a mooninite middle finger and won't show PENIS FOR LUNCH on a sign in Deadham for fear of the Tiny Tots.
Then there is the National news, which is nothing but scare-ya features about teh hurtin peoples of the month and more hollywood tabloid horrors. Oh, that and 5 minutes on Iraq, tops.
Why bother when you can google?
I'll summarize what they've said in the past
By Lyss - 11/25/07 - 11:51 pm
Most of my friends (mostly mid-20's) have said that they don't want The Media deciding/telling what constitutes News. That's what attracts many of them to Digg, Reddit, etc.
However, some of them do watch the local news (esp. in the a.m.) for the weather report.
Yes, yes
By MT (not verified) - 11/26/07 - 1:38 am
If it feels like news, it is news! As evidenced by the current headlines on Digg's frontpage:
As a computer nerd, I hold this truth to be self-evident
PS3 Orange Box "Downright Unplayable," says 1UP
Christmas Lights 2007 - Where you are in control!
Facebook Blocked In Syria
Malibu On Fire Again (PIC)
See which states love small businesses,,,,
Please Do Not Masturbate In Walmart, Barnes And Noble, Or Dillards
Bash tips and tricks
Famous in Lego World
Gamestop Sells Customer Demo Disc
Sarkozy's New Girlfriend is the "Hottest Woman on French TV"
Social Media is "The Godfather" of the Internet
The fight over grandma's money [PIC]
When Does Congress ACTUALLY Work?
10 Cyber Monday Deals Worth Checking Out
It's all Ditto
By Rebecca (not verified) - 11/26/07 - 4:23 pm
If you watch TV news, it repeats every 10 to 15 minutes. Sure, there is the teaser report at the end of the broadcast (investigative reports), but there is so much crap to wait through, just visit their website and watch the clips.
As for print media, the local paper on Cape Cod runs an average of three local stories a day, everything else is from the AP, Boston Globe, ETC. There is actually more 'local' news found on various blogs then in print!
As to why younger people are more prone to tuning out old school media, it would be that we were raised with the net and don't carry cash to get a paper out of a metal box.
Metal box?
By Ron Newman - 11/26/07 - 4:29 pm
I doubt many people buy papers from those boxes anymore. Easier to have it home-delivered, or buy it from a hawker at a T station, or go into a CVS or a 7-Eleven.
recommended reading
By Sandy (not verified) - 11/26/07 - 4:33 pm
Rebecca, Starbucks sells The New York Times newspaper. You could pay for it along with your latte with a credit/debit card. Sit down with latte at Sbux for 5 minutes and read this newspaper... you might enjoy it!
Why I stopped
By Anonymous (not verified) - 11/26/07 - 4:48 pm
I stopped paying attention to mass media outlets when it started to become painfully obvious that they had shifted from "wanting to bring me the news" to "wanting me to watch" (whether that was a development on my part or their's, I don't know).
Watch or read nearly any news channel/paper/outlet today and they are overtly in competition with each other to grab the greater market share, thus improving their profits via ads/etc, and therefore they attempt to appeal the greatest common denominator of their potential audience. Rather than ask the in-depth and/or difficult questions and demand accountability and answers, they peddle whatever they are given so that they can go back to spoon-feeding celebrity "news" and other generic pablum to us because enough of the general public is willing to watch it just to chat about it the next day. The general public doesn't *want* to think about hard topics these days, they are willingly led into appeasing their short attention whimsies and not concerned with deep thought. Thus, that's what the mass media outlets are willingly tapping into in order to attract the most viewers and push the most product...thus, further shortening the length people are willing to think about a topic. It's a vicious cycle and self-fulfilling. On top of that, many of these outlets choose to partition the total viewer pool by some specific polarization (e.g. Fox News caters to a conservative PoV). Often the story is skewed to appeal to a specific demographic, giving up on appealing to everyone with all of the facts and letting the viewer/reader decide the truths of the matter and simply feeding half-truths to those who want to hear that side of the story. Of course, if they become good enough at it, they develop the Howard Sternian "I listen because I want to hear what he says next (because I love/hate him)" demographics too...becoming so polarizing that they actually wrap back around the spectrum to grab those they originally pushed away.
I choose not to follow this downward spiral and so I am forced to find either better (or simply more) outlets to satisfy my requirements for understanding and absorbing a current issue. This often means multiple different sources discussing the same topic in order to piece together enough of these short and stupid summarizations to get a fuller picture. Since I need such a wide range of sources to get any sort of value from my search, I choose the internet...home to nearly all sources these days. I will often learn firsthand of a story by an aggregator, like Digg or Fark or UniversalHub (for local info), but then I will start to do my own searching and reading up on the relevant information that I can find (and I've gotten quite good at find some really obscure information when desired). I don't need major sources any more because they don't give me what I want, I can not trust what any one says, and so I have found ways of coping in this "News brought to you by the Vice President in charge of the Entertainment Division" mass media that we appear to be stuck in currently.
I blame the media for stoking many of the problems that we have today because they no longer inform us of the facts or reveal the truth behind spin and rhetoric so much as "market the news" in the current cultural climate.
plus ca change
By Ron Newman - 11/26/07 - 4:52 pm
But is any of this really different from the days of Hearst and Pulitzer and The Front Page?
So?
By Anonymous (not verified) - 11/26/07 - 5:16 pm
No, it's not very different in terms of strategy and even tactics. Let's hope it reaches the same endpoint as Pulitzer, who pulled out of yellow journalism and turned his paper into what I think is needed, and not like Hearst, where his employees ended up calling for the death of a president (and got their wish).
I did not say that we had always been a country with a shining example of the press until now...only that if they wonder why I'm not watching/reading, the answer lies in how they have lost their course on the way to deep, upright, honest, and informative journalism...if that's even their course at this time.
How about 30 minutes of
By Anonymous (not verified) - 11/26/07 - 5:12 pm
How about 30 minutes of actual news without commercial breaks every 3 minutes so that stories can be covered with some semblance of in-depth reporting.
sounds like you want NPR and its cousins
By Ron Newman - 11/26/07 - 5:15 pm
such as American Public Radio and the BBC World Service. These can be found locally on WBUR and WGBH radio.