and got all upset and then realized that the article was from July 2002. That took the wind out of my sails. It doesn't make Santorum any less of an anus, though. I can't believe the story didn't get any play at the time.
on someone being an anus. I just wonder if people in Boston think a guy like Mitt Romney should take this sitting down. Why isn't he going apeshit over this?
As Marilora notes, it's a three-year-old article. So a wingnut thinks we're all Godless Commies? What else is new? Say, how 'bout them Red Sox? Pretty good series down there in Philadelphia, eh?
As for Mitt, he's running for the conservative - if not yet blatantly wingnut vote (if you can believe that his strategist was misquoted about him faking his abortion-rights position). Again, so what else is new?
I heard him on the radio being interviewed about Gay marriage. His position is that marriage is defined as a man, a woman and kid(s). If you don't have children you don't fit his definition of being married. It isn't scary that someone has that opinion, but rather that someone who can get elected can have that opinion. He wouldn't be able to say these things unless he has a political base which agrees with him. That scares me.
up
Voting closed 0
Support Universal Hub
Help keep Universal Hub going. If you like what we're up to and want to help out, please consider a (completely non-deductible) contribution.
Comments
I saw that too
and got all upset and then realized that the article was from July 2002. That took the wind out of my sails. It doesn't make Santorum any less of an anus, though. I can't believe the story didn't get any play at the time.
There's no statute of limitations
on someone being an anus. I just wonder if people in Boston think a guy like Mitt Romney should take this sitting down. Why isn't he going apeshit over this?
You're kidding, right?
As Marilora notes, it's a three-year-old article. So a wingnut thinks we're all Godless Commies? What else is new? Say, how 'bout them Red Sox? Pretty good series down there in Philadelphia, eh?
As for Mitt, he's running for the conservative - if not yet blatantly wingnut vote (if you can believe that his strategist was misquoted about him faking his abortion-rights position). Again, so what else is new?
I guess I'm not married after all
I heard him on the radio being interviewed about Gay marriage. His position is that marriage is defined as a man, a woman and kid(s). If you don't have children you don't fit his definition of being married. It isn't scary that someone has that opinion, but rather that someone who can get elected can have that opinion. He wouldn't be able to say these things unless he has a political base which agrees with him. That scares me.