Skip to main content

Could somebody explain Proposition 2 1/2 to the Herald?

By adamg - 3/28/08 - 8:48 am

David Wedge sexes up a story about local officials seeking lots of Prop. 2 1/2 overrides this year by gasping that Prop. 2 1/2 is "under siege."

No, Dave, it isn't. Prop. 2 1/2 has always had provisions for letting voters override its limits. It's a fundamental part of the law. And if it's part of the law, then it becomes stupid to write that local officials are "asking homeowners to ignore Proposition 2 1/2" (and in any case, overrides apply to all property owners in a city or town, not just homeowners, and even renters are free to vote on them).

Comments

Durrrr

By Pax Arcana (not verified) - 3/28/08 - 9:29 am

There's also this gem from the article:

"And the tanking of Gov. Deval Patrick’s casino bill, which would have pumped $400 million into the state’s sagging economy, dealt another devastating blow."

How quick does Wedgie think the casinos were going to get built?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes