By their SUVs you shall know West Roxburyians
Lino takes a trip to Millennium Park in West Roxbury and is amazed by the number of SUVs in the parking lot:
... I counted a total of 66 vehicles. Out of a total of 66 vehicles I saw 2 pickup trucks, 3 minivans, and 33 SUVs making a total of 38 gas guzzling vehicles. I realize that West Roxbury is one of the most affluent parts of the city of Boston but a parking lot where 57% of the vehicles are gas guzzlers, I sort of wonder about the mental stability of some of these people. Don't they realize that bigger is NOT always better. ...
Two things: Not everybody there is from West Roxbury. Millennium Park is sort of the regional soccer center. But then again, this is West Roxbury, where one pizza place (Target Pizza on Washington Street) uses a Hummer H2 to deliver pizzas.
- Add new comment |
- Send to friend |
|
|
| 

Lino doesn't get out much.
Lino doesn't get out much.
It's entirely possible they used them for car-pooling
If they're at a soccer center, those SUVs might have been used for carpooling, in which case they would really be better counted as ecologically sensible private-sector bus systems...
Uhhh...
SUVs usually hold 4 or 5 people. You know, just like a sedan or hatchback does. How are you justifying the need for one again?
But a sedan probably can't
But a sedan probably can't also hold 4 or 5 people's worth of stuff in addition to those 4 or 5 people.
As an example: suppose you and 4 of your buddies wanted to go golfing and each of you has his own set of clubs. Let's see you stuff 5 people and 5 sets of golf clubs in a prius.
Done and done
Maybe I'll post a picture next time I go out to the driving range. I've gotten 4 people in a late model Corolla with 4 sets of clubs in the trunk (bags and all). We didn't even have to remove all of the crap my friend has in his trunk all the time either.
If you're claiming the benefit is 1 extra guy and 1 extra set of clubs, I bet we could have fitted him in if we really needed to. Even if we couldn't, I'd take 2 Priuses over 1 Land Rover or Explorer or whatever you like if we're dealing with environmental impact and gas use.
Yeah but,
The prius has a sub-trunk, so that would fit at least one bag, probably
Let's talk about average
Let's talk about average sized Americans here. Some people take up th space of three average sized Canadians for example!
Minivans are not necessarily gas guzzlers
They are far more fuel efficient than SUVs, according to the information that I found when shopping for a mid-size vehicle that could haul six to seven people, camping gear, groceries, bikes, an IKEA kitchen, lumber, etc.
Minivans also have a whole lot more space than SUVs - most minivans are seven passenger and have a lot more cargo room than the typical 5 passenger SUV.
I wont claim that my minivan is easy on gas, but I still wouldn't call it a guzzler - particularly since it typically contains 2 or more people. Then again, the MPV is one of the smaller vehicles available and doesn't need a ginormous engine.
Oh, and for some people, bigger IS better and highly appropriate - we have only one car for four people and we don't commute with it. We really do use all the space for people and stuff, and having two cars and driving them both together when we need to haul more than 5 people or lots of stuff makes zero sense.
Gas Guzzler's and LINO
Lino is in the parking lot at Millenium snapping pictures of cars and minivans? And he wonders about the mental stability of these folks? Find a mirror Lino.
Last thing I want to see at Millenium is some dude with a camera who does not have a kid playing soccer or a dog at the end of a leash. Save your pcitures for Cambridge.
I know what you're trying to say, but ...
Last thing I want to see at Millenium is some dude with a camera who does not have a kid playing soccer or a dog at the end of a leash.
There are plenty of reasons for a dude with a camera who does not have a kid playing soccer or a dog at the end of a leash to be at Millennium Park. You might want to go up there some day and see why. At sunset, say.
ridiculous
Cmon adamg. Ned's comment is nothing less than ridiculous. Since when does a solitary adult with a camera at a public park equal a threat to anyone's safety?
According to Ned, pedophile photographers should bring a dog to avoid suspicion and cheer for kids playing soccer as if one of them were his.
Is there any merit to Ned's implication that pedophile photographers like Cambridge or is he just showing his general contempt for the place?
A lot of people my age were victimized by pedophile catholic priests. Maybe Ned's thinking is a little clouded by that whole clusterf*ck.
A lot of people my age were
Whatever his reason, I agree that it's clouded.
There are other reasons
there are other reasons to be up on Millenuim
does the guy have a kid who wants to play on the park?
Kiting?
Adamg almost always brings his camera up there and he doesn't have a kid playing soccer or a dog at the end of a leash!!
That's right
And I've never had a dog playing soccer or a kid at the end of a leash, either.
Geocaching!
You could always be there looking sneaky with your GPSr out and maybe even a camera while wandering around the park hiding behind bushes keeping an eye out for non-geocachers who will want to know why you're creeping around their kid's soccer game (since that's all people go there for, evidently).
You could be there Geocaching!
There are two different geocaches in Millennium Park for non-soccer-mom and non-pedophile reasons to be in the park!
CRV vs. minivan... CRV = 1, minivan = 0
Our Honda CRV SUV gets 29 mpg on the highway... far better than anyone's minivan, I'm sure. Not only that, but it gets better gas mileage than many mid-size sedans that we lookd at.
CRV vs. minivan ...
Minivan 7, CRV 4
Adults and/or large children, that is. You can squeeze 5 in a CRV if one is a child, but you cannot have much else along for the ride.
I got $2500 worth of IKEA cabinets for my kitchen in a single load with my two young helpers. My husband stuffed a loveseat, two chairs, and two kids in it once. One 55 mile round trip at 20 mpg is more efficient than two 55 mile trips at 29 mpg.
My neighbor has two CRVs, but he still occasionally asks to borrow our van or uses his brother's when stuff/people don't fit. The key factor isn't the actual mileage of a vehicle - it is the the number of person-miles per gallon. We trade off the lower efficiency for fewer than average annual miles and more total people transported.
Then your minivan works for
Then your minivan works for you and your neighbor. That's great. I'm not concerned with transporting large Ikea purchases, nor do I have children.
What's an SUV?
The second I hear someone trashing SUVs, they lose all credibility. SUV is like any other generalism - it just makes you look like a narrow-minded idiot. In these days of all the crossover and multi-purpose vehicles, trashing a car simply because you label it an SUV just doesn't work.
I have this long diatribe stored somewhere on my PC with a long argument against SUV-haters. You know the type - "I hate all SUVs" or "I'd never buy an SUV". But, I'll just give you my condensed version of the argument.
I just got a Honda Element, which I believe SUV-haters would label an SUV. Please. It's a 4-cylinder engine, gets 23-26 mpg, and I can actually fit a week's worth of camping gear and bicycles inside. Try that with your Prius. Because of some of the things I do, I need a vehicle that holds stuff, and the Element is a good mix of utility, fuel efficiency, and price. Don't get me wrong, the Prius is a cool car, but the glam factor has gotten way out of control, and it doesn't fit my needs.
What about a Toyota Highlander? All it is is a Camry with a different body.
What about a Subaru Forrester, which Subaru markets as an SUV. Again, a 4-cyl engine that gets good mpg.
My point is, if you want to shit on gas-hogs, shit on gas hogs. But don't shit on some label which is too gross a generalization, even though it's cool (and easy) to shit on SUVs.
Gas hogs and stuff
You're right that SUV doesn't equal gas hog, yes. There are non-SUVs (like bigass Cadillacs, for instance) that waste just as much gas.
But, at least for me, the problem with SUVs is that most of them are heavier and use more gas than other vehicles that hold the same number of passengers. Unless your vehicle holds more people than mine (and is routinely used for carpooling so as to get additional cars off the road), it shouldn't use more gas than mine. (And admittedly, my car doesn't get the best mileage, but does get better than pretty much every SUV that also holds four people.)
I do appreciate the fact that you're someone who needs the SUV for frequent hauling of your work/personal stuff. Most of the people I know who have vehicles like the Element (and larger, much much larger!) are usually driving them around alone with a briefcase and a bag of groceries in the back. Sure, they might need a bigger car once a month or so for hauling something large, but why not use Zipcar or a weekend rental when this happens, instead of driving around a large empty car on days you don't need it? Also, even most of the people I know who use SUVs or vans for hauling work stuff are usually driving them around alone with all the back seats in seating position. A hatchback with the seat folded down gets better mileage and has as much cargo room.
[OK, but, if a Camry and Highlander are the same car with a different body, why does the Highlander get 18/23 mpg and the Camry get 21/31? Oh, I know, it's because the Highlander has a bigger and heavier body, even though it doesn't hold any more passengers. So you actually just helped make the point that SUVs are usually pointlessly wasting gas.]
It all comes down to fuel
It all comes down to fuel efficiency, who cares about the size and weight?
A guy in Alabama was able to use off the self GM parts to retrofit a H2 to get 50-60 miles to the gallon, while doubling its horsepower all for under $5K. Better yet, it can run on just about any type and mix of fuel (with different degrees of fuel efficiency), in the case you cant get one in one area.
The GM techs saw it and were amazed and said GM told them it could never been done. This guy proved them wrong.
Pics or it didn't happen.
I'll settle for a link also.
The Hummer Hybrid
Yes, it is happening. No, it isn't built yet and the estimates are estimates. Yes, it could get that 50-60mpg kind of mileage (if you don't count the energy input from the hydrogen injection system). No, it doesn't cost "just $5,000" - it will be about $30,000 for all the modifications.
The system involves a jet engine, modified to burn biodiesel with hydrogen injection. The jet charges a set of supercapacitors which run an electric motor for locomotion.
This was in Fast Company magazine a bit ago - but like the gossip game, it gets better with each retelling as people seek to make hummers look rational. SAE Energy's Jonathan Goodwin is working on this as a test of the technology.
weight is the big factor
It turns out size and weight but mostly weight is the single biggest determent in fuel efficiency.
Ford is investing billions into lightweight but extremely strong materials to replace steel in vehicles as a strategy to improve fuel efficiency, in addition to making improvements in the power plant, such as hybrid engines.
Needs/wants
Well, kind of. Maybe the Highlander actually serves their needs better? Maybe they want/need AWD. Yes, I admit that the Camry will definitely get better mpg simply because it weighs less and is more aerodynamic. Aerodynamics is what kills my Element's mpg.
Let's look at it another way. Suppose one has a car that gets 30 mpg. Hey, that's great, 30 mpg is quite good. But, they could do better. Why don't they get a car that gets 40 mpg? Probably because of needs/wants. I would have loved to have gotten a car that gets 40 mpg. It comes down to a personal decision.
Aerodynamics is what kills
Aerodynamics is what kills my Element's mpg.
Ya think? ;o)
Your car:

Close...
It's silver! ;-)