Should it be news that the governor's daughter is a lesbian?

Yes
9% (26 votes)
No
43% (120 votes)
Dunno
4% (10 votes)
Wha? He has a daughter?
44% (123 votes)
Total votes: 279
|

Anyone else catch this?

By timlav | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 1:49pm

From the Globe article:

Katherine Patrick told the gay newspaper Bay Windows in an article published today

(emphasis added).

I didn't know a newspaper could have a sexual preference, and I worked in newspapers for 10 years!

Perhaps a better wording would be (though more wordy): "told Bay Windows, a gay-friendly newspaper..." I know it's not perfect, but it doesn't actually say the newspaper itself prefers same-gender relationships.

a standard idiom

By Ron Newman | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 1:58pm

The Forward is "a Jewish newspaper". The Bay State Banner is "a Black newspaper". The Pilot is "a Catholic newspaper". Sampan is "a Chinese newspaper" (written partly in English).

Most people intuitively understand what is meant here, even though newspapers can't have religions or ethnicities or skin colors.

The Ron Newman, a Serious Poster

By Brett | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 2:11pm

Tell that to the goose I saw driving down Memorial Drive in my convertible. I had no idea how he got the keys...

Interesting point, Ron

By timlav | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 2:19pm

Thank you, Ron, for making that point (and I'm not being sarcastic). It is true that one might call those papers such the way one might refer to a paper as liberal or conservative.

I've probably been influenced by the PC police, but I am wary of appending such adjectives for fear of offending.

Isn't there also an "Irish newspaper" distributed for free in various pubs around town? I guess calling it Irish-friendly would be a bit silly. :)

Guy walks up to the bar: "Hey, mate, you have that Irish-friendly newspaper here?" (Insert hairy eyeball from bartender.)

Cheers,
Tim

A Black Newspaper?

By SwirlyGrrl | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 2:20pm

Wouldn't that be difficult to read?

Or do they print only negative stories?

[/smartass]

Who's the Globe for?

By DE (not verified) | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 3:50pm

So is the Globe for white people who make more than $40,000 a year? Is the Herald for Massholes?

Who is the Herald for?

By Hubster (not verified) | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 12:19pm

I thought the Herald was just for Howie Carr. Does anyone else besides him read it?

The Hetald is for shoplifters ...

By anon (not verified) | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 12:44pm

Or at least that's what one department store ad executive once told the Herald: "Your readers are our shoplifters."

Legendary of Urban

By SwirlyGrrl | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 12:47pm

I think I've heard this story told about every city that once had 1 + x newspapers, where x>0.

eye+<3

By pom (not verified) | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 12:50pm

swirlygrrl.

wrong newspaper and city?

By Ron Newman | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 12:48pm

I always heard this story as being a response by the head of Bloomingdale's to Rupert Murdoch trying to sell them advertising space in the New York Post.

Tony Masarotti, when he's writing baseball

By bobmetcalf | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 12:48pm

Makes it worth buying. Silverman is pretty good too.
But gawd help us all, Rob Bradford, the new beat reporter,
is terrible. Over-blown, tortured analogies
sprinkled between third grade prose and construction.
I have yet to be able to finish one of his pieces.

Also, the local politics and crime reporting is pretty
good, especially compared to the Globe. I mean, you
get the feeling that they actually bother to send
reporters, rather than interns, to exotic places
like Teele Square or Monument Ave.

I'd take Gelzinis over Walker any day

By adamg | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 12:55pm

For the same basic reason - he actually goes out and talks to people in person.

Yep, missed Gelzinis

By bobmetcalf | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 1:10pm

I like him as well--especially his stuff on Romney
during the campaign. But has anyone
actually confirmed that Joe Fitzgerald
didn't assume room temperature
some time during the Carter administration?

Happy for her

By adamg | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 1:55pm

Queen Dee writes:

... Whether or not sexual orientation is something that should be a cover story is none of my business. What I will say is that I love reading about what a wonderful experience it can be for children who are loved unconditionally to accept who they are and find love and acceptance from their parents too. That's a double-whammy and I'd put that on the cover of any paper any day :) ...

I don't think it should be

By Krissy (not verified) | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 4:18pm

I don't think it should be breaking news, but I thought the story was kinda cute.

What I think

By anon (not verified) | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 5:49pm

This shouldn't be on the cover of The Globe tomorrow. This was a Bay Windows exclusive. Live it as a breaking news update and maybe a brief on B2.

follow-up

By anon (not verified) | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 9:45am

So I guess they put it on the front page. Why not those poor Boy Scouts that were killed in the tornado?

Well, my guess is that it

By anon-o-mus (not verified) | Thu, 06/12/2008 - 6:48pm

Well, my guess is that it was *meant* to be news by her and/or her dad since (at least as I heard it on WBZ today) it ended with a promo for their tandem appearance in the Pride parade this weekend.

Her mom burst out laughing

By SwirlyGrrl | Fri, 06/13/2008 - 8:56am

I read the article in the Globe. When she felt she had to tell her parents, she cornered them in the kitchen and said she really had to tell them something really important.

Her mom was bracing herself for something actually difficult or even horrible. "I'm pregnant" or "I'm in trouble with the law" or "drug problem" ... not something that just is different like "I'm gay"!

Who really gives a shit. Its

By Tod (not verified) | Sun, 06/15/2008 - 1:44pm

Who really gives a shit. Its nice she's gay, but whoopie fucking do. What makes her different that the 1000s of residents that come out every year. Why don't they get a write up and mentioned in the paper and TV. and who really fucking cares..

What makes her different?

By SwirlyGrrl | Sun, 06/15/2008 - 3:16pm

1. her parents didn't throw her out of the house

2. she wasn't sent to "psychological deprogramming", with lots of Bible of course

3. her father didn't beat her up

4. her mother didn't ground her and force her to wear dresses and other hyperfeminine attire to "fix" her

5. she felt that she could talk to her parents and do so without 1-4 happening

On one hand, it is a "so what". On the other hand, I think it is great for such a prominent family to be so very supportive of their daughter being who she is. It underscores how NORMAL and NATURAL being gay is, and what a true supportive response looks like.

Sad to say, some people really need that.

Agreed

By eeka not logged in (not verified) | Sun, 06/15/2008 - 4:23pm

There doesn't need to be any bigger of a deal made, because her father is the one who has chosen to be a public figure. But I agree that it's nice to see portrayal of nice, normal queer folks, particularly from families who are seen as successful and as role models to an extent. Most of us do tend to be just normal old folks, but, like most minority groups, we only garner media attention when we do something really unusual (typically something negative...)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.