Belmont tired of shedding light on Watertown

By adamg - 10/14/08 - 1:36 pm

Wicked Local Belmont reports Belmont officials are getting just a little tired of paying to light up their side of Belmont Street when Watertown has no light poles on its side of the street:

... "Should Watertown pay for some of that?" he said. "Sure they should. They get some of the light."

Comments

Belmont was once part of Watertown

By Ron Newman - 10/14/08 - 1:42 pm
#1

and also of Arlington and Waltham and a little bit of Cambridge. It broke off from those and became a separate town in 1859. Belmont history

Seems to me like Belmont

By ShadyMilkMan - 10/14/08 - 2:35 pm
#2

Seems to me like Belmont waited about 125 years too long to complain about this. Watertown doesnt even own any of the street.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.