Hey, there! Log in / Register
'We’re bad because we’re an older city and we still have fuel oil'
By adamg on Wed, 04/08/2009 - 11:41am
Commonwealth UnBound interviews Edward Glaeser, director of the Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston on why Boston rates worse than cities in California and even Rochester, NY in a study of carbon emissions.
Glaeser says one solution would be allowing denser development. He lives in Weston, but says he would "absolutely" support more development there.
Neighborhoods:
Ad:
Comments
Greenies
That's where a single-minded obsession on one element of the periodic table gets you.
Comfortable Hypocrisy?
Oh, ha ha! Look how brown they are! It's not really green at all! People really shouldn't live like I do, shouldn't do it at all. People (not me of course) should live in dense places, like cities. They're too icky for me, but should be good enough for the common people.
Of course, I don't expect to actually do anything. But I take it sooo seriously on a rhetorical level. It's a Life Challenge! The way other people live, and especially write letters to the editor, is simply impermissable.
Because it's obvious...
that Glaeser makes all the decisions for his entire family. His wife and children want to live where? Screw them, Ed says Weston!
Also, the dude clearly realizes the irony and was making a joke.
Soon-to-be former resident of Weston
If Glaeser says publicly that he would support more development in his own town of Weston, then I predict his fellow Westonians (?) will run him out of town. Them's fighting words in Weston.