Hey, there! Log in / Register

Alleged T pervs: One caught, one sought

Lopez
Lopez

An East Boston man faces a charge he groped an undercover MBTA Transit Police officer near Dudley station yesterday - even after the officer identified himself as a cop.

Ricardo Lopez, 41, is scheduled for arraignment in Roxbury District Court this morning.

Meanwhile, Transit Police are continuing to hunt for a man they say sexually assaulted a teen at a Downtown Crossing Red Line platform last month and who was last spotted getting off the Red Line at Fields Corner.

In his report, the officer who arrested Lopez says he was standing on a busway platform near the Washington Street side of the station around 1:15 p.m. yesterday when Lopez sidled up to him and asked "How are you papa?" The officer said Lopez continued to chat him up and eventually looked down at his groin and said "I want that [expletive] papa." The officer said he excused himself, called his partner and then turned back to Lopez and arranged a meeting with him and his "friend" across the street - in public view since the officers were in plainclothes. Once across the street, the officer says he identified himself as a police officer, but that only seemed to increase Lopez's ardor:

At that time, Lopez stated, "I want that [expletive] papa" and proceeded to grope my genitalia."

He was then placed under arrest.

Wanted
Seen him?

MBTA Police report they are searching for a man who allegedly offered a 15-year-old $10 to let him lick her on the southboound Red Line platform at Downtown Crossing on April 4. When she refused, he grabbed her hands, led her to some stairs and began undressing her:

Victim buttoned her pants back up and pushed suspect away. Suspect then asked to kiss her. Victim told him no, and he forcefully kissed victim, sticking his tongue in the victim's mouth. Suspect threw $5.00 at the victim. Suspect and victim boarded the last train towards Ashmont.

If you have any info, you can call MBTA Transit Police at (617) 222-1072.

Innocent, etc.

Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

"Sir, I'm an officer of the law...no, sir, I'm not making conversation...sir, I have to arrest you...no, sir, I'm afraid this isn't roleplaying...No, sir, Miranda is not my girlfriend..."

up
Voting closed 0

April 4 and they are only now putting out the alarm!

Got to love the mentality that it isn't a sexual assault if you throw money ...

up
Voting closed 0

1. The mere allegation of sexual assault can easily ruin someone's life, even if they are innocent. Authorities might need time to investigate.

2. Authorities might have hoped to spot the suspect in a T station, and felt that announcing would reduce the likelihood of spotting and apprehending.

These are layperson guesses. Perhaps Pete Nice or someone will chime in.

up
Voting closed 0

You don't have to put out a specific description of a perv. Considering the number of high school girls who have to use transit to get to school, you would think they would have put out a warning that somebody was attacking teens, no?

up
Voting closed 0

Sometimes the victim waits a long time before reporting it, sometimes it takes a while to actually pinpoint a picture of the perp. Other times the dectectives dont want to release any info because they are close to making an arrest (it doesnt look like that in this case).

More often than not this kind of thing happens more than the public realizes.

There is a shift now though in releasing early info on sexual assaults as many of these guys will strike several times in a short time frame. That makes it very important to get that info out right away.

I would agree that over a month is probably too long for this info to get out.

up
Voting closed 0

I'd think that the goodness of a general warning would (going back to my conjecture) outweigh the badness of tipping off the suspect that the victim reported. Presumably there are other factors.

Oh, wait, I'm assuming two things without founding: (1) that the victim reported near the time of the incident, rather than relatively recently; (2) that authorities are only now announcing, rather than only now did I hear about an announcement that was more timely.

up
Voting closed 0

They just had a whole campaign warning women/girls about this sort of thing less than 6 months (maybe less) ago. Remember? Their adds and handouts said, "Rub against me and I'll expose you."

up
Voting closed 0