Hey, there! Log in / Register

Young Bostonians not very volunteerish?

Volunteer Boston says Bostonians between 25 and 34 are less likely to participate in volunteer activities than their peers almost anywhere else.

Neighborhoods: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

well as a bostonian in that demographic who has upon multiple occasions contacted local charity organizations about volunteering (via email addresses indicated for such contact on their website) only to never get a reply..... i'm not suprised.

up
Voting closed 0

I've sometimes had that experience too. Just a few months ago, after filling out the Web form for a stewardship organization in Boston, their Web site barfed. So then I emailed the inquiry address given, which was supposed to reach the board members. No response from any of them. (For that same organization, maybe a year earlier, I similarly had no response when I emailed to offer donating photos I'd taken at one of their events, after the newspaper didn't do a story.)

For another Boston organization -- one that farms out volunteers to various other organizations -- I did get an enthusiastic response, but when I went to a new member orientation, the application form was so imposing and intrusive that I wasn't sure that I was even eligible. (Really, all I wanted to do was pick up trash, clean graffiti, plant trees, winterize houses, or whatever, not join the CIA.)

I did get on email lists for 2 or 3 organizations that farm out volunteers to events that don't require the CIA interrogation. I've been a bit surprised that most of the opportunities that come across the lists have me wondering whether they have any positive impact at all.

I did have success getting appointed to a local advisory committee on a civic issue important to me. I've also been able to contribute for years to some software used in HS and college education, due to an esoteric technical niche I happen to know. Leveraging white-collar skills might be the way to go, when nobody seems to want my help as a volunteer laborer. A friend of mine who used to build houses for the low-income is now a lawyer, and is on a few nonprofit boards instead (instead of nailing boards).

Years ago, I did behind-the-scenes public interest advocacy on a few issues at the national level, til I realized I no longer had the stomach for it, during the GWB administration. Funny how in some ways it was easier to operate on future of nation and humanity than it is to get marigolds planted on a traffic island.

up
Voting closed 0

I volunteered in high school and college, but now as a 25-year-old professional, I work two jobs to support myself and afford to live in this city. I do what I can to help people out whenever, but my free time is so limited that "volunteering" is not an option. I think that study overlooks how expensive it can be to live in this city.

up
Voting closed 0

Maybe that's because we're broke and have no time, maybe? Just a wild guess.

up
Voting closed 0

Let me say right up front that I'm not exactly Mr. Volunteer....

Unless you're a parent with kids or have similar responsibilities (family obligations, school, etc.), saying you don't have time doesn't work - especially if you're single. Everybody has the same 24 hours, and it really comes down to priorities. Is your time filled by real obligations, or are you simply "busy"? If you're just busy, and are claiming that as an excuse, then it's a matter of what's more important to you. My point is that there is a difference between being simply busy, and really having no time.

Hey, if you simply don't want to volunteer, that's fine, just say so. There's nothing worse than a volunteer that really doesn't want to be there.

And, what does being broke have to do with being able to volunteer?

up
Voting closed 0

Having lived (and volunteered extensively--with Friends of Trees, Humane Society, Meals on Wheels, food banks, and more) in Portland and Austin before moving to Boston (where I haven't, sadly, volunteered at all) I will say that EVERYTHING (volunteering included) seems to take so much more time, money, and effort here, which may be why people don't volunteer. It also seems that "volunteer" organizations here have a much bigger focus on fundraising and socializing rather than actual volunteer work. It's like Boston thinks you'd do more good by paying $150+ (which most of us youngsters can't afford) to hobnob with local pols/celebs than by working with your hands or, god forbid, mind. It's just not a very youth-friendly ethos, and it's pretentious to boot. Maybe the well-off Harvard and MIT grads can afford it, but not the rest of us...

up
Voting closed 0

http://www.volunteeringinamerica.gov/factors.cfm?c...

The above link shows factors that influence volunteering rates and shows Boston's percentages compared to national averages.

I'm suspicious of their average commute time being only 28 minutes, but I guess they consider only residents of Boston, not all the people who work in Boston.

Second, while the poverty rate is below average, I'm cautious because I don't believe the numbers used to calculate poverty are adjusted to reflect the cost of living in a given area. Anybody know?

My own hypothesis is that the most visible sign of volunteering in Boston appears to be accosting people on the sidewalk with clipboards. I could see how people could be turned off. :)

up
Voting closed 0

Those are often paid jobs, not volunteering.

up
Voting closed 0

All the worse then because most people I know assume they're volunteers.

up
Voting closed 0

Even the ones who get paid aren't necessarily motivated just by the money. They might be able to make more money elsewhere, or not really need the money, but they care about the cause.

But they have to know that most people assume they're pure volunteers when they ask people to make a pure donation of money, which is not purely cool.

up
Voting closed 0