Log in / Register All Boston UH only

T operator needed cell phone to call dispatchers in fatal crash

Smashed train

What's left of the front of the trolley that smashed into another train in May, 2008. Source: NTSB.

Tomorrow, the National Transportation Safety Board discusses the May, 2008 collision on the Riverside line that left one trolley driver dead and a passenger with severe injuries. If you can't wait for the press reports on the meeting, you can listen in over the Web, starting at 9:30 a.m.

In advance of the meeting, the NTSB has released a ton of documents and photos related to the crash, including the transcript of an interview of Linda Jenness, who was the operator of the second car in the trolley that got plowed into by another trolley. She reports she had to use her cell phone to call a Green Line dispatcher because the radio in her car was dead:

Q. When you called Central, did you -- how did you make that call?
A. I called Central, and I said -- he said this is a Code 1, this is a Code 1. We're in emergency situation. I said, Central, I'm here.
Q. Did you call on the radio?
A. My cell phone.
Q. On your cell phone.
A. Because my radio was dead.
Q. Okay. Was your radio dead before the accident?
A. Yes.

However, under further questioning, she seems to indicate she didn't know if the radio was broken before the crash.

The T this year banned cell phone possession by T workers after another Green Line crash - but also says it now has daily testing of radios in trains.

Jenness also describes helping passengers get off the train - and seeing train driver Terese Edmonds and knowing instantly she was beyond help.

Oh, well, then by all means

By Kaz | Mon, 07/13/2009 - 8:17pm

A cell phone in every pocket! I mean, it's not like the 50 other passengers weren't calling 911 or anything. Not like any of them couldn't let her use their phone to call dispatch. Not like she should have had a FUNCTIONAL radio before heading out that day in her trolley.

Hell, you know what. Give them all Sprint two-way cellphones. Then kiddie-lock them down to only calling dispatch. They get a cellphone life preserver to latch onto and we can stop crying every time we hear they *needed* one to call in to dispatch...but they don't get to text their BFF Jill and kill us all at Boylston.

For those just joining us

By neilv | Mon, 07/13/2009 - 8:24pm

http://www.universalhub.com/node/25096#comment-83809

I have nothing to add to my several points there.

Were the man sitters in the

By ShadyMilkMan | Mon, 07/13/2009 - 8:26pm

Were the man sitters in the back of the bus ok?

If you read the full

By anon (not verified) | Mon, 07/13/2009 - 9:25pm

If you read the full transcript, she contradicts the radio statement a couple of times. From what it sounds like, she only knew that the radio didn't work after the accident; she didn't have cause to use it before the accident.

You're right

By adamg | Mon, 07/13/2009 - 9:42pm

On second reading, her testimony gets pretty confusing.

NyQuil contributed to this accident?

By Ron Newman | Tue, 07/14/2009 - 5:50am

The article in today's Globe says that the investigators found a sedating over-the-counter antihistamine, doxylamine, in the dead driver's blood. This is the active ingredient in NyQuil and Unisom.

Found in urine, not blood

By Kaz | Tue, 07/14/2009 - 9:56am

It was fully metabolized and would not have affected her performance, says the NTSB.

oops, I didn't read carefully enough

By Ron Newman | Tue, 07/14/2009 - 3:08pm

and as a result propagated an incorrect statement. My apologies.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.