Hey, there! Log in / Register

Flaherty, McCrea against tax increases

City Councilor Michael Flaherty says he opposes Mayor Menino's plan to increase meals and hotel-room taxes in Boston, saying adding 0.75% to the meals tax and 2% to the hotel tax would unfairly burden local diners and business owners already hard hit by the recession.

Flaherty, who wants to replace Menino, says there's plenty of fat in the existing city budget that could be could to raise the $18 million Menino says the city would gain by implementing the taxes. Both proposals go before the city council on July 19; Flaherty will vote against both.

Kevin McCrea also opposes the new taxes: "The city is not in a fiscal crisis, just a crisis of management."

... If, unfortunately, the tax increase is passed remember that the Mayor promised to have it offset the residential property tax. If he doesn't include that in his legislation, you will see yet another example of him saying one thing and doing another.

Flaherty's statement:

(July 23, Boston) - Mayoral candidate, Michael Flaherty, expressed his opposition to Mayor Menino's efforts to impose an additional tax burden on the city's hotels and restaurants, arguing that he has failed to effectively manage the city's revenue and spending.

"This administration has not even begun to scratch the surface of the inefficiencies that have bankrupted our local government," asserted Flaherty. "Instead of taking a hard look at where he can consolidate or eliminate programs and cut costs such as high-paid consultants, this Mayor looks for the fastest way he can get a bailout."

Flaherty is a strong and vocal proponent for implementing annual performance reviews to identify opportunities to run government more efficiently, trim wasteful spending and redirect funding to critical services. Performance reviews have effectively saved governments across the country millions of dollars. In the state of Texas, where performance reviews first originated, their first performance review generated 1,000 recommendations and $4 billion in savings and revenue in its first budget.

"If we're going to have a discussion about how we can diversify our revenue, then I think we need to have a frank discussion about what this administration has done to make our government run more efficiently and with less money," challenged Flaherty. While the administration has maintained during the budget process this year that it trimmed spending, they failed to provide any evidence that a comprehensive performance review has been conducted and that fiscal waste and abuse have been expunged from City Hall. In fact, under Mayor Menino, personnel expenses have increased by $416 million since 2004, including $220 million in pay raises, expanded overtime and new hires.

Flaherty acknowledges that the city should not be further burdening Boston's homeowners with higher property taxes, but also maintains that the city's revenue management strategies can't unfairly burden resident diners, visitors and local small businesses who are dealing with their own challenges brought on by this economic downturn.

"I am very concerned about the implications of this Mayor's "tax-before-manage" strategy will have on our ability to attract new businesses to our city," said Flaherty. "We've already seen the Mayor try to handcuff our small businesses when he shut down negotiations with Sail Boston, which ultimately brought in a lot of visitors looking for a place to stay and eat. Had we left it up to the Mayor, our local businesses would have missed out on that opportunity to capitalize on a major special event."

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Did Flaherty's press secretary write it for you?

up
Voting closed 0

Her headline: FLAHERTY PROTESTS MAYOR'S LATEST TAX CALL

up
Voting closed 0

I think it was a call to check your (perhaps freudian) spelling!

I have to agree with Flahts on this one!

(although the offset idea, as long as it's permanent, not the one year previously proposed by Menino is actually a good one for city residents - the $23 million they claim it will raise would save about 4-5% off of our property taxes - a definite step in the right direction - I think we should add incremental PILOT to the program as well-if they want a tax increase - vote on an override)

up
Voting closed 0

In the interests of full disclosure:

Opened my e-mail this morning to find a press release from the Flaherty campaign about taxes.

Wrote it up. Dropped a line to Flaherty's press person to see if this means he will actually be voting against the tax increases when they come before the council next week.

Made breakfast.

Saw McCrea also doesn't like taxes. Added that in.

Got reply from PR person. Add that in.

See Stevil's note. Fix spelling of Flaherty's name, remember again why I shouldn't blog before that first cup of coffee.

up
Voting closed 0

....Flaherty does not want to tax out of towners dinning in our city (0.75%)? How else is he going to give Local 718 all the money they want? As a city resident I appreciate city hall finally getting more money from (mainly) visitors to our city and keeping some of the burden off of us.

On a side note: When is Flaherty going to stop with the "Mayor says this so I say that" approach to campaigning? He has been in the City Council for 9 years and is resorting to this kind of a campaign......sad.

up
Voting closed 0

This is true. How can you spend more money on certain issues while revenue is going down without raising more cash?

up
Voting closed 0

City's dirty little secret that the Globe/Herald has failed to report - thanks to the last round of state cuts - the operating budget got "slashed" by 1%-it was slated to go up by 1-2% before that. However - even half of this is due to an accounting change in an obscure medicaid reimbursement account - no real "cash loss". Keep in mind that the schools got I think $30 million in stimulus funding and the police got $20 million (a few strings - but not too hard to get around). These are kept outside the operating budget in what they call "external funds" where the city budgets for grants and other outside revenues so the city can claim that the budget is declining. Bottom line - all in the budget is actually increasing about 1.5%. The whole "crisis" was mostly because we promised away AVERAGE 5% raises for our workforce and we couldn't afford that. Add on increases in health care and the crisis was because we needed a 6% or so rise in the budget to afford everything the mayor promised to existing employees.

There was never a revenue crisis on the city level (big issues at the state) - the worst case would have been everybody takes a pay freeze - instead, thanks to the teachers and cops insisting the city honor their contracts - we were able to trim some of what Flaherty is talking about. Still some left and I'm sure the cronies are all safe and snug.

up
Voting closed 0

Let's be real - Flaherty, Yoon and McCrea are going to either oppose everything the Mayor does until November, or if they agree with something, they'll just say it's long overdue.

up
Voting closed 0

I could write a Sak/Zak-like bot that campaigns for mayor: monitors news reports, uses a few "AI" tricks, and issues press releases to various media outlets using the formula you just provided. :)

up
Voting closed 0

That would be hilarious

up
Voting closed 0

Just to be fair, the Mayor has done his share of copying ideas from Flaherty, McCrea and Yoon: more charter schools (after Flats and Yoon and I think McCrea proposed it, and the Mayor opposed it for years), better use of tech at City Hall (City Hall's working on an iPhone app -- does the Mayor know the difference between an iPhone and a Corona typewriter?), etc. I'm supporting Flaherty (although his rookie staff screw-ups and BFD issues are driving me insane), but my point is...only a few new ideas emerge during any campaign, and often others will quickly claim them as their own -- it seems everyone in this campaign is guilty of that.

up
Voting closed 0