Hey, there! Log in / Register

Don't bother looking for a parking space around the Common on Thursday

They'll all be occupied by scooters whose drivers are part of a "scoot-up" to protest the change in their RMV status - which could lead to them being fined if they park on sidewalks.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I wish I had a scooter to go to this with, but I'm not allowed to store gasoline powered engines in my condo - no place to put one.

up
Voting closed 0

They're more expensive, but they're just as fast as the gas scooters, plus the "cool factor" of using no gas. X-treme Scooters sells a variety of Chinese imports:
http://www.x-tremescooters.com/

Mine is the XM-3500 on that site. Range is about 40 miles, charging time 6 hours, top speed 45MPH.

up
Voting closed 0

hmmmm, Great idea, mobilize political support for your cause by blocking traffic and hogging parking spaces for people who are going to work or have appointment in the area.

Thanks in advance from all of the people that you'll aggravate.

Possible options

Ticket them
Tow them
Do a smokey and the bandit roll over.

For more info...

up
Voting closed 0

Where does it say anything about blocking traffic?

And how is legally using a parking space, as the new law will demand "hogging"? What will they be ticketed for? Following the law?

They have business at the state house (protest) and they will park to attend this protest.

And if youre going to work, you certainly should not be using street parking.

up
Voting closed 0

Well, that's a shame. I was out of your way and we were all doing fine before our duly represented state body went and screwed up the laws to benefit nobody except the RMV. Take it up with them.

We're just giving you a taste of the problems that will arrive in the coming months as we are forced to register our scooters as "limited use vehicles" OR we ditch our scooters altogether and go back to our cars, since the benefits of a scooter in this city and state just went down to near nil.

up
Voting closed 0

There have been a few changes regarding two common motor vehicle laws that went into effect last month.

One of them is driving without insurance. Before last month, if you were caught driving a motor vehicle (or motorcycle) in MA without insurance, it was a criminal offense. Your car was towed, and you were given a criminal summons to appear in court. This summons comes after you mail in your citation that would not have a monetary fine on it like a civil speeding ticket would. 90% of the time, the fine was $100-$200 depending on your drivers record, It was up to the judge to decied on court fees and the amount that goes to the registry. Now, there is no criminal offense. Your car gets towed and the fine is $500 that goes right to the registry. Its just like a speeding ticket.

The other one is driving with a suspended license. Before you could be arrested on your first offense, and it was criminal with the same process as if you had no insurance (plus the arrest part). Now, same thing. No right of arrest, no crime, but a civil ciation of $500 that goes right to the registry.

I know if you get convicted of driving after supsension the second offense is arrestible, but Im not sure if driving without insurance is criminal after the first time.

up
Voting closed 0

Thanks for the warning. Anyone know the time frame that they will be messing things up?

They are not getting any sympathy from me by doing this.

up
Voting closed 0

that the transportation commissioner of boston declares they are not going to enforce?

or is this not about parking?

does anybody know -- aside from the parking thing, is there any *other* reason scooters owners are vexed about this?

up
Voting closed 0

I can't speak for the organizer or anyone else who might participate, but I'm considering going for all of the above.

The new status is absurd. There is nothing inherently different about 30 mph and 35 mph or even 39 mph and there's nothing more dangerous about my scooter on August 1 than there is now. Has there been any kind of study to suggest that scooters in MA are a dangerous threat that needs more regulation? According to this law, if my vehicle were stated as a maximum 41 mph, I'd be a motorcycle AND allowed on the highways...but only doing 41 mph down the Pike....because that makes a lot of sense. Meanwhile the guy doing 2 mph slower has to take the back roads. It's not even entirely clear what defines the maximum speed of the vehicle. It's not on any of the paperwork that came with my scooter and it's not very easy to find online anywhere. Besides, if I put on a simple washer on the transmission, I can restrict myself to whatever speed I want. I've even found something that claims to electronically restrict my engine...with a key fob that lets me turn it on and off at my leisure. Speed should have nothing to do with this. On top of that, there was a financial incentive to getting a scooter (no insurance, simple $40/2yr registration, no extra licensing/classes, no parking costs) and most of that goes out the window. I bet you won't even be able to find an insurance company willing to sign up your 49cc scooter on Aug 1.

Boston's parking laws and basic setup around town is absurd in light of these changes. I'm sure Tinlin's word is golden, but you're never going to know with a meter maid what they're going to ticket or not. And if you get that lucky ticket on your newly plated vehicle, what are you going to appeal? The rule says "no plated vehicles parking on the sidewalk". It doesn't say "unless Tinlin says it's okay".

The whole thing is absurd and doesn't benefit anyone but the RMV's (and potentially BTD's) coffers. They claim they can't "track" us unless they plate us and that's even more absurd. They've been "tracking" us through registration, except they never figured out how to enter that information into their computers. Instead, they're lazily using "plates" as a means to get us into the system already in place. The same identifying information could have been put on our sticker all this time (and has been, it just never went from there into a computer) and left us out of this "limited use" classification discussion by continuing to leave us in the motorized bicycle category.

But no, they started swinging a sledgehammer instead of a tack hammer. Now they've royally monkeyed up everything beneficial about driving a scooter (seriously, name one incentive other than fuel usage that remains about using a scooter in this city that used to exist before they were nearly all turned into "limited use" vehicles).

By the way, there have already been scooters the exact same size as mine that never came close to fitting the motorized bicycle definition (like a LX150) because of engine size. They've already had to get motorcycle plates and have NEVER been able to park on the sidewalk. So, they've basically had to find creative ways (removable tags, rain cover, etc) to hide in plain sight this whole time, because they still have the same problem with parking (too small to be taken seriously in a full space, easy to knock over/steal/etc if not chained...).

So, it's a little bit of everything. It's a ruining of an entire class of vehicles through over-regulation and nonsensical "mph" limitations and adding the additional parking headaches.

up
Voting closed 0

that's just what i was looking for. i figured there had to be other issues at play, but all the mainstream press is dwelling on is the parking.

and don't get me wrong -- the parking thing is a problem. for a small scooter to have to park (and not lock to anything) in a large car space is absurd and somewhat dangerous.

i was just wondering about the other issues. thanks for the thoughtful post :)

up
Voting closed 0