You really can sue anybody for anything

Sorry, had to say it.

In any case, the answers are in this order issued by a federal judge in Washington state in August of this year: Basically, dude didn't like the way some local court treated him when he got divorced in 2000 (gosh, I can't imagine why) and he became convinced Boeing, where he used to work, was part of the conspiracy against him. Air India, too, since it buys Boeing jets. And Ford? Well, Ford's CEO used to work at Boeing, so therefore he's part of the conspiracy, which of course, makes Ford complicit, as are those 14,000+ federal and city officials who are ignoring him.

OK, but why Boston? That's in the order, too. The judges of Washington state have gotten thoroughly sick of him - in fact, they barred him from filing more suits - so he keeps filing suits in other courts (12 so far in federal court, dating back to 2006, and including one suit against John McCain). The judges keep telling him a) private citizens can't bring criminal charges in federal court and b) he can't file civil suits in their jurisdictions, since none of the named officials (formerly Bush, now Obama) live in them, so they keep trying to move the cases back to Washington state, where he lives, where the judges, showing remarkable judicial restraint, keep telling him to stop filing lawsuits. Or, as the Honorable Richard A. Jones, United States District Court Judge, puts it:

Mr. Keyter is no stranger to this District's courts or to the federal courts in general. Three of his previous suits were dismissed in this District. One of those dismissals, in Keyter v. United States, came in an order that barred Mr. Keyter from filing certain suits in this District. See Case No. C08-5235RBL (Dkt. # 13) (May 13, 2008 order) (hereinafter "Bar Order"). The Bar Order detailed Mr. Keyter’s habit of attempting to bring criminal charges against hundreds of government officials, ranging from the President of the United States, members of Congress, federal and state judges, and a host of others. It noted that Mr. Keyter had been admonished by at least two federal district courts that private citizens have no right to institute criminal charges. The Bar Order observed that Mr. Keyter's complaints stem from his divorce proceeding in 2000 in Pierce County Superior Court. Mr. Keyter was dissatisfied with the result of his divorce, and blamed the presiding judge, his former wife, and her attorney for the outcome. He then embarked on a campaign of communicating with government officials in an effort to correct what he believed to be a miscarriage of justice. When his efforts were unsuccessful, he named each of the officials with whom he communicated as a coconspirator. Numerous iterations of this process have led to Mr. Keyter's current allegations, contained in a three volume "Dossier of Crimes" which he has filed in each of these cases. The Dossier of Crimes alleges that more than 14,000 government officials at all levels of state and federal government are "known insurgents" guilty of various "crimes." Among the "known insurgents" are members of the United States armed forces, the entire United States Cabinet, thousands of state and federal judges, entire Congresses of the United States, state executive officials, state legislators, prosecuting attorneys, and a few Washington city officials for good measure.

The Bar Order concluded with a prohibition on further suits from Mr. Keyter that arise from his efforts to remedy what he believes to be an unjust result in his divorce proceedings:

The plaintiff, Anthony P. Keyter, is hereby prohibited from filing in this court any action which arises from his previous divorce and plaintiff's resulting actions to remedy the alleged injustices. If plaintiff attempts to file in this Court any other action arising from the divorce action or if a matter is transferred to this Court from another District raising this subject matter, it will be summarily dismissed.

So look for his Boston suit to be transferred to Washington state for disposal.

Phew!