Hey, there! Log in / Register

Damon wasn't really all that

Andrew once again proves why baseball is a game of statistics with his analysis of why Damon wasn't as good as we think (caution: you will need to digest his explanation of something called SecA first):

... Johnny Damon was a below-average Major League hitter in 2005. Below Average. He fared somewhat better among center fielders and leadoff men, but not by enough to make his loss a real crime. For $13 million dollars a year, along with the promise of lost speed and plunging production, I want way more for my money than a singles hitter who failed, catastrophically, to do much else.
...

Meanwhile, Meg comes up with another statistic:

... If it's not the Curse of the Epsteino that's bringing this down upon the Nation, perhaps it's a Curse of the Queer Eyes. Of the five Sox who appeared on "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy," (Kevin Millar, Jason Varitek, Johnny Damon, Tim Wakefield, and Doug Mirabelli), only Wakefield and Varitek now remain.

Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

You show me a *real* Sox fan who doesn't know that Damon was overrated. It's the fact that he went to the Antichrists because they waved more green. You know, a lot of us could leave our jobs for the first place that offers us a little more cash, but many people stay where they are because they like the company, their co-workers, etc. etc.

People who think all the fuss is about us "losing" Johnny simply because of his ability to play ball doesn't really understand, and no amount of explaining will help them get it.

===========================

From the brains behind http://www.bigdumptruck.com

up
Voting closed 0