Skip to main content

Tough job: Working with young adults trying to get their lives on track

By adamg - 11/18/09 - 10:15 am

Candelaria Silva discusses working as a part-time job counselor with 18-22-year olds trying to go back to school or get their GEDs:

... I long to have superhero-powers to turn back the clock to the pivotal moments in their lives where they veered off course. I want to meet the adults and institutions who've failed these young people, all of whom were clearly born with enough intelligence and talent to succeed. What they lack is a clear purpose or direction. Their interests are infuriatingly narrow. Their goals are incredibly small. Getting them to set goals, make an outline for how getting the degree and a job fits into their future plans is nigh impossible. ...

Comments

A more faithful rendering of Silva's highly decorated prose

By Jonas Prang - 11/18/09 - 2:45 pm

Here's a more faithful rendering of Candelaria Silva's earnest prose.

I long to have superhero-powers to turn back the clock to the pivotal moments in their lives where they veered off course. I want to meet the adults and institutions who’ve failed these young people, all of whom were clearly born with enough intelligence and talent to succeed. What they lack is a clear purpose or direction. Their interests are infuriatingly narrow. Their goals are incredibly small. Getting them to set goals, make an outline for how getting the degree and a job fits into their future plans is nigh impossible.

All-in-all, she resorts to nine—count 'em, nine—font sizes and styles of emphasis. Silva might be a writer of merit, but she is depressingly dependent on visual gimmicks to prop up her prose.

Whenever Adamg quotes a snippet, I'm eager to read more, but I forget what I'll find at the other end of the link. The visual confusion of her page telegraphs to me that she herself hasn't identified her main point. Or, and worse, that I, her reader, cannot be relied upon to judge it for myself.

Formal versus Informal Writing

By SwirlyGrrl - 11/18/09 - 3:11 pm

It's her blog. It isn't your blog. She can write as she chooses and it really doesn't matter because it is about her own thing, not communication per se. If she were writing for a journal or a newspaper article or other sort of formal communication - like a cover letter or resume - I'd agree with you. When it's your private scratch space, artistic license applies. I suspect that she didn't write this because she wanted to communicate something, but because she needed to write out her demons to blow off steam.

Pedantry has a place, but not as a substitute for actual writing and creativity on one's own part, or as a means to "one up" others. I can be witheringly nasty about improper writing when, say, some undergraduate assaults me with textlish in what is supposed to be an official university communication. I won't go after somebody's unreadable addiction to font whacking on their own blog just to feel special.

Yes, her addiction to font whacking makes her prose unreadable

By Jonas Prang - 11/18/09 - 3:41 pm

SwirlyGrrl, I'm with you until you say that a blog is not communication. This verges on nonsense. Silva wrote it and published it. Adamg drew notice to it. And, you, I, and others read it.

In your second paragraph, the one where you play the man, not the ball, you render my point explicit: Silva's addiction to font whacking makes her prose unreadable for me.

Stripped of the gee-gaws, I'm truly eager for more. Her topics are of great concern to me, but confronted with the strident emphasis, I'm repelled and I cease reading.

It's not unreadable to me. A

By NotWhitey - 11/18/09 - 4:29 pm

It's not unreadable to me. A little distracting, but perfectly logical.

Given that there were no "ur"s or "u"s, and no strings of exclamation points or question marks "!!!!!!!" - "!?!?!?!, I can't complain.

If you're repelled by a little text drama, then it's more a you problem than a her problem. Toughen up - a little boldface type won't kill you.

Thank you

By Candelaria (not verified) - 2/22/10 - 10:24 pm

Thank you for "defending me." I had never heard of the term font-whacking until now, but since it's been pointed out, I will try to reduce this practice. No one has ever said anything to me on my site about finding my use of different fonts, underline, bolding, color or anything as distracting or annoying. I will consider these comments as I go forward.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes