Tom Reilly's choice of Marie St. Fleur as a running mate
By adamg - 1/31/06 - 12:55 pm
Inspired, brilliant
20% (11 votes)
Stupid, chowderheaded
37% (20 votes)
Won't make any difference
17% (9 votes)
Huh? Who are these people?
26% (14 votes)
Total votes: 54
Comments
all of the lefties on this
all of the lefties on this board will vote yes just to appease their great white liberal guilt.
...
Wow.
Well I'm not white, so where
Well I'm not white, so where does that leave me Mr./Mrs anonymous?
I voted "Won't make any
I voted "Won't make any difference," so you're wrong.
I live in her district, and
I live in her district, and St. Fleur ain't much of a lefty. People far away who don't bother to find out who she is may think she's all progressive, and the symbolism of a woman of color as a Lt. Gov candidate is certainly important. But truth is, she doesn't lead much. She likes to put her name on things, but doesn't have a lot of accomplishments. As a big lefty myself, there are many people I'd much rather see run for LG.
all of the righties on this
all of the righties on this board will vote no because they are big screaming racists.
HOORAY! Aren't stereotypes fun?
The lefties will vote
The lefties will vote "yes?"
There is no "yes."
so ron, are you admitting
so ron, are you admitting you are a big leftie? do you have any great white guilt?
Big? No, I'm barely 5'5".
Big? No, I'm barely 5'5".
All the folks on the left
All the folks on the left will vote "yes" because of liberal white guilt? Voting "yes" isn't even an option. So much for reading comprehension.
I agree with the comment saying St. Fleur is far too eager to put her name on things. She doesn't do the work, but loves the credit.