Boston to charge suburbanites if they cause an accident in Boston?

|

More details

By adamg | Tue, 08/01/2006 - 7:25am

Commuter crashes eyed as a cash cow.

Well sure, as long as the

By LaDivina | Tue, 08/01/2006 - 8:13am

Well sure, as long as the reverse can be true, too. *eyeroll*

Yes, great. It's about time

By brian (not verified) | Tue, 08/01/2006 - 4:37pm

Yes, great. It's about time someone addresses or takes on the inequitable MA auto insurance industry. People should pay insurance rates based upon their driving records, not based upon where their personal vehicle is garaged.

It's called public transportation. Use it!

By Boston resident (not verified) | Tue, 08/01/2006 - 6:32pm

I love it! Pay up, suburbanites!

We should charge boston

By Anonymous 2 (not verified) | Thu, 08/03/2006 - 8:24am

We should charge boston 3-times the amount because boston drivers suck at driving. "Fact" not "Fiction" We should name it the road rage capitol of Massachusetts

The reverse should totally have to be true, then

By Ann O'Nymous (not verified) | Thu, 08/03/2006 - 3:11pm

The reverse should totally have to be true, in that case--I just read some police logs of towns on the South Shore, and there were innumerable violent, drug, and vehicular incidents wherein the perpetrators were from Boston and environs...so, should we spend the time and money catching Boston's criminals who come down to us to commit the crimes? Not to mention bearing the social cost of the junk they are bringing in. I think not. What a fine idea.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.