<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.universalhub.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Civil Liberties</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/128</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en-US</language>
<item>
 <title>Suspicionless searches on the T</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/node/7618</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Michael Blim slinks by &lt;a href=&quot;http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2007/02/below_the_folds.html&quot;&gt;the jodhpur-clad transit cops doing a bag search&lt;/a&gt; at Stony Brook, but that gets him to pondering the police&#039;s newfound ability to conduct searches without warrants, at least on MBTA property:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;... The 4th amendment guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure that in many areas of law restricts police searches to those whom they suspect of a crime or who arouse suspicion of criminal intent no longer applies to subway and bus riders. Any city that wants to conduct &quot;suspicion-less&quot; searches on their mass transit can. The judicial trick is that because no one is under suspicion, everyone can be under suspicion. Anyoneâ€™s rights can be violated so long as everyoneâ€™s rights can be violated. Call it equal opportunity rights violation. ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.briankaneonline.com/2007/02/life_liberty_the_pursuit_of_ha.html&quot;&gt;Brian Kane&lt;/a&gt;, who has more to say on the topic.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.universalhub.com/node/7618#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/jamaica-plain">Jamaica Plain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/mbta">The T</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/128">Civil Liberties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/4102">Orange Line</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/112">Stony Brook</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:09:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adamg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7618 at http://www.universalhub.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mass. HB 1881 hearing in Gardner Auditorium at State House</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/node/1229</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;WE NOW KNOW THE CIVIL LIBERTIES HEARING WILL BE IN GARDNER AUDITORUM&lt;br /&gt;
AND WE NEED TO FILL IT -- PLEASE PLAN TO BE THERE TO SUPPORT THE BILL&lt;br /&gt;
OF RIGHTS -- the REAL PATRIOT Act!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.universalhub.com../1209&quot;&gt;Hearing on HB 1881 -- the Resolution Affirming the Civil Rights and Liberties of the People of Massachusetts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.universalhub.com/node/1229&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.universalhub.com/node/1229#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/36">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/128">Civil Liberties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/274">Massachusetts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/275">PATRIOT Act</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:27:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mythicflow</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1229 at http://www.universalhub.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hearing on HB 1881 -- the Resolution Affirming the Civil Rights and Liberties of the People of Massachusetts</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/node/1209</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Support the Bill of Rights -- the REAL PATRIOT Act&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wednesday, June 22 at The State House in Boston&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10 AM: Hearing on HB 1881 -- the Resolution Affirming the Civil Rights and Liberties of the People of Massachusetts&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12 noon: Rally in Boston Common near the steps of The State House&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.universalhub.com/node/1209&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.universalhub.com/node/1209#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/36">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/128">Civil Liberties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/274">Massachusetts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/275">PATRIOT Act</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:01:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mythicflow</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1209 at http://www.universalhub.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Boston City Council resolution affirming civil liberties.</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/node/918</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu-mass.org/cltf/&quot;&gt;Civil Liberties Task Force&lt;/a&gt; (CLTF) at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu-mass.org/&quot;&gt;ACLU of Massachusetts&lt;/a&gt; has been trying to have the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cityofboston.gov/&quot;&gt;Boston City Council&lt;/a&gt; pass a resolution affirming our civil liberties  in an attempt to counter their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu-mass.org/cltf/resources/&quot;&gt;erosion&lt;/a&gt; due to certain aspects of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu-mass.org/cltf/resources/briefing_papers/patriot_act_briefing_paper.pdf&quot;&gt;USA PATRIOT Act&lt;/a&gt;. This can happen only if the City Council President and Councillor at-large, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cityofboston.gov/citycouncil/cc.asp?id_name=Flaherty&quot;&gt;Michael Flaherty&lt;/a&gt;, allows the resolution to be brought in front of the Council. So far he doesn&#039;t seem inclined to do so.&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.universalhub.com/node/918&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.universalhub.com/node/918#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/36">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/128">Civil Liberties</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 14:41:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mythicflow</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">918 at http://www.universalhub.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flag desecration amendment is back again.</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/node/889</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The US Congress is once again talking about the constitutional amendment to prohibit the physical desecration of the US flag. The House joint resolution (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.Res.10:&quot;&gt;H.J. Res. 10&lt;/a&gt;, 108 sponsors) was introduced on March 2, and the Senate (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquerytr/z?d109:SJ00012:&quot;&gt;S.J. Res. 12&lt;/a&gt;, 51 sponsors) on April 14.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu-mass.org/cltf/cltf_update/2005-04-22.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Mass. ACLU&lt;/a&gt; - Four members of the Massachusetts delegation support the amendment: Richard Neal, James McGovern, Stephen Lynch and William Delahunt. They need to hear from their constituents.&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.universalhub.com/node/889&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.universalhub.com/node/889#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/36">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/128">Civil Liberties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/129">Flag Desecration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/130">US Constitution</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 04:44:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mythicflow</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">889 at http://www.universalhub.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
