<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.universalhub.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Appeals Court</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/3373</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en-US</language>
<item>
 <title>State appeals court to Boston City Council: Knock it off</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/node/14301</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Terry Klein has &lt;a href=&quot;http://decisionismblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/open-meeting-plaintiffs-prevail-sort-of.html&quot;&gt;a copy of the decision and some analysis&lt;/a&gt; of a case in which the council was accused of illegally barring the public from at least 10 meetings over a two-year period (including one on a tularemia outbreak at a BU lab). Although the court sent some issues back to a lower court for final disposition, the justices are clearly getting a little tired of the Boston City Council, in a decision that starts:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The city council of Boston finds itself, not for the first time, on the losing end of a determination that it has improperly excluded the public from its deliberations. ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.universalhub.com/node/14301#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/boston">Boston</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/36">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/3373">Appeals Court</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/103">city council</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/603">Michael Flaherty</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:22:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adamg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">14301 at http://www.universalhub.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
