<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.universalhub.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Scituate</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/3492</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en-US</language>
<item>
 <title>Oopsies: Globe acknowledges the T is not tearing down a brand-new bridge</title>
 <link>http://www.universalhub.com/node/14963</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Remember the other day when the Globe &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.universalhub.com/node/14901&quot;&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; on what seemed to be Yet Another Only at the MBTA Moment, i.e., that the T would have to tear down a brand-new bridge on the brand-new Greenbush line?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today, the Globe ran &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/10/for_the_record/&quot;&gt;the following&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because of a reporting error, an article in Friday’s City &amp;amp; Region section about a bridge that needed to be replaced as part of the Greenbush commuter rail line project incorrectly reported the bridge&#039;s age. The bridge being rebuilt in Scituate is more than 100 years old and is downstream from a three-year-old rail-crossing bridge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.universalhub.com/node/14963#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/mbta">The T</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/2756">Greenbush Line</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/3492">Scituate</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:36:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adamg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">14963 at http://www.universalhub.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
