<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/634/0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>LNG</title>
    <link>http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/634/0</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-US</language>
          <item>
    <title>Fully loaded LNG tanker adrift off Cape Cod</title>
    <link>http://www.universalhub.com/node/12850</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wbztv.com/local/lng.tanker.adrift.2.651545.html&quot;&gt;Remain calm&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
     <comments>http://www.universalhub.com/node/12850#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/634">LNG</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adamg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12850 at http://www.universalhub.com</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>LNG tankers to Outer Brewster Island</title>
    <link>http://www.universalhub.com/node/2304</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Sco &lt;a href=&quot;http://point08.blogspot.com/2005/10/why-not-outer-brewster.html&quot;&gt;makes the case&lt;/a&gt; for putting an LNG facility there: Basically, better there than in the middle of a densely populated area such as Fall River - or around the Inner Harbor.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
     <comments>http://www.universalhub.com/node/2304#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/36">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/497">Boston Harbor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.universalhub.com/taxonomy/term/634">LNG</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adamg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2304 at http://www.universalhub.com</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

