Hey, there! Log in / Register

10-foot steel coupling ring? What 10-foot steel coupling ring?

After spending $137,000 attempting to locate the 10-foot diameter steel coupling that broke causing the multi-day boil water order for 2 million people in the Boston area in May, the MWRA is regrouping because it can't find a trace of the giant steel ring anywhere.

Of course, there's always my theory that it was never there in the first place...

Neighborhoods: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I've been waiting for this to show up. We have as much chance of seeing that coupling as we do of finding Curley's desk.

up
Voting closed 0

An interesting theory, but it assumes things that even more improbable, though not impossible. If workers did not put the coupling on, what did they do with it? Surely someone would notice a spare ring lying around. And why did the pipe not fail much earlier? Uncoupled pipes leak quickly in virtually any situation, including your own basement, let alone under the particularly high-pressure situation here. Or are you suggesting that none of the couplings anywhere on the pipe have rings--i.e., none were even ordered? It seems unlikely that would go unnoticed now, or that it would avoid similar problems. It does not seem particularly unreasonable that a large piece of metal--or more likely, now several pieces of metal, contrary to your assumption--could be lost under silt following a massive flood of millions of gallons of high-pressure water. This was not simply an intact piece of metal tossed into the river and then sought for; you seem to be vastly underestimating the power of large-scale water flow. You still might be right, but you are presenting unfairly limited possibilities. I would add that $137,000 spent on a search for the broken coupling is not an excessive amount to attempt to find a key piece of evidence in what likely will be forthcoming litigation involving sums far greater than that.

up
Voting closed 0

1) What did they do with it? -- They kept it in storage. When the same contractors were brought in to repair the broken pipe, they already had a spare coupling lying around they said. It's the reason the fix took only a few days instead of a week or more.

2) Why not fail earlier? -- The joint was still encased in cement, as planned. They assumed that would hold it and allow them to keep to their timetable. Plus this particular coupling was like the 3rd plan they ended up with because the first two wouldn't work after the two pipes came together off of specification from the initial plans.

Also, I mentioned the money just because the article mentions the money. I made no comment on the value of that money. I personally feel it was (and still is) worth it to spend the money searching (intelligently, mind you) for the coupling (assuming it's out there to find). As the article mentions, it's hardly a drop in the bucket of the MWRA's budget. Of course, what I can't figure out is why they can't use a large metal detector, or variation thereof, to find it.

up
Voting closed 0

MWRA considers a stop to the search now that they've dug down 3 feet below the pipe and reached silty soil that may destabilize the pipe and lead to another leak that nobody wants.

So, it wasn't in the river dredge, it wasn't observable to divers, and now it's not in the 23 feet deep hole surrounding the pipe that they've re-excavated. We're talking about a TON of steel in the form of a gigantic ring of metal that has vanished without a trace (and can't get too far down river without hitting a series of locks and gates).

up
Voting closed 0

There was surprisingly good quality security cam footage of the leak as it first erupted from the ground. I would imagine the camera continued recording after that. I'm inclined to believe a 1 ton ring of steel flung from the ground probably would have been somewhat visible - even in the murky mess of water.

up
Voting closed 0