Hey, there! Log in / Register
Union Supporter For Coakley Paid $50 And Says Voting For Brown Anyway
By GarrettQuinn on Tue, 01/12/2010 - 5:09pm
Last night before the final debate in the campaign to fill the vacant US Senate seat the usual show of force by both candidates appeared outside UMASS Boston.
One of Coakley's supporters said he was voting for Scott Brown but said he couldn't pass up the $50 to hold a sign for her.
Neighborhoods:
Topics:
Free tagging:
Ad:
Comments
Hmm...
More proof Republicans are sleazy? ;) I guess if he got a tax cut, he wouldn't need the money.
I'm surprised...
he's not living off the fat of the land after all those years of Bush tax cuts. In fact, how aren't we all living in architecturally marvelous McMansions, driving Ford F-150s and watching Cowboys games on 60-inch plasma televisions after eight years peace and prosperity? With that O-BamaCare and that I-raq war ending, soon we'll all have to be out carryin' signs. Why can't folks just let us start wars over old grudges and subjugate the working class through social Darwinism? We need more All-American looking guys in flannel shirts and army fatigues to show us the way, because they're the future.
Sleaziness is hardly limited to the GOP
......as our succession of indicted Mass. House speakers aptly demonstrates!
Surprising for two reasons
1) The guy said what he said without fear of getting his kneecaps busted
2) he only got $50. What about shift minimums? Come on, he can't really be in a union.
Note the tags on the OP
"Martha Coakle" hahaha ! Which state is she from?
Still laughing...I can't stop
Yes, I'm easily amused.
----------------
Red Mass Group
Dorchester Politics 2010 Special Election Martha Coakle Scott Brown unions
Add new comment E-mail this page Subscribe to: This post
----------------