Amy Lord's final ride

The bank's ATM in that picture is located on the outside of the building. It was only steps away.

He took her to five different banks but if you look at the map of her route you can see that he is not driving around aimlessly. This route looks like it had been planned ahead of time. The East Boston Savings Bank in Andrew Square was developed to cater to drive-in patrons. Although it is right there in a busy square it appears to be situated behind a maze of fencing. The next bank the Metro CU appears to be a drive thru. Also it would have been quicker to drive through the South Bay mall but he drives west all the way down Southampton Street until it reaches Mass Ave and then drives east on Mass Ave -this puts him on the correct side of the street for the Metro CU. His route appears to be designed to avoid having to take a left turn into on-going traffic at certain banks -the route to Metro CU and then the legal U-turn on Columbia Rd to go in the right direction. Why???

His last bank is a Citizen's Bank in Dorchester. There was a Citizens Bank on Columbia Rd across the street from the Bank of America and Sovereign Bank. Although it appears he wanted (5) different banks -he still wanted a particular branch of each bank,

Also did he drive the car back to South Boston because he had to get back to his car he had left behind? There is a back way into that project where the car was found it is off Dorchester Ave. which is just up the street from Andrew Square and the first bank - East Boston. Also the streets in that housing development are a maze of one-way streets. The back entrance would have out him on the corner of Sterling Square and Logan Way.

This methodical behavior appears to be quite different than the man who was attacking and stabbing random women in South Boston.

I believe you're describing this drug.

http://www.vice.com/vice-news/colombian-devil-s-br...

I don't support the death penalty because the government and the courts screw up. A LOT.

And defense teams also free a lot of guilty parties and send them back on the streets, where they repeat offend. A LOT. And defendants in death penalty trials also get a lot of bites at the apple, be it through multiple appeals, well meaning legal students and organizations like The Innocence Project, etc.

I would rather every monster spend their remaining life in a little box than see an innocent person killed by the state.

Me, too. Except that they don't. Criminals have it pretty good in this country, even those on Death Row. Access to healthy meals and top notch medical care, Cable TV, fitness centers, internet and libraries (and even taxpayer-funded sex change operations, although he/she isn't on Death Row). Show me the "little box" and I become less interested in the death penalty.

And the reality is that there are far more dangerous felons freed than there are innocents jailed, in spite of the media and Hollywood's portrayals. If you can match up one imprisoned innocent to every ten felons that will ultimately be freed by, say Annie Dookhan's shenanigans, I would be surprised.

And the following isn't directed at you, just a general observation:

If indeed guilty of the murders for which they're charged, the failure of the poor and minorities to avail themselves of exonerating legal loopholes the way their wealthier, murdering counterparts are often able to do, is not an indictment of Capital Punishment. The OJ verdict wasn't a victory for anyone (again, murder, but not necessarily death penalty, but you get my point).