Hey, there! Log in / Register

Court: Police commissioner can transfer officers even if they're union officials

The Supreme Judicial Court ruled today Police Commissioner Ed Davis had the right to transfer a sergeant out of the Brighton station even though a provision of his union's contract forbids that without his permission.

The state's highest court said state law, which gives the commissioner"authority over the assignment and organization of the officers within the department" trumps contract language barring the "involuntary" transfer of certain supervisory officers - even if the city itself had agreed to that language to help settle a lawsuit over transfers aimed at punishing officers for their union activities.

Regardless whether the city's consent to [the non-transfer clause], may be gleaned from the fraught history between the parties, a nondelegable authority may not be delegated to an arbitrator, even with the parties' consent.

Before going to the SJC, the two sides had gone to an arbitrator, who ruled in the union's favor.

At issue was Davis's transfer of a sergeant following a 2007 incident inside the D-14 station:

Sergeant Ralph Caulfield is a Boston police officer who served as an area representative of the union at the D-14 police station in the Brighton section of Boston. In January, 2007, Caulfield and another sergeant were involved in a physical fight in the duty supervisor room, during which Caulfield punched the other officer in the face. The station captain suspended the other officer, but did not suspend or otherwise discipline Caulfield. Although the two men did not work on the same shift, as supervisors they were required to interact and to exchange information during shift changes. The other officer said that an underlying tension remained between the two. The station captain and the chief of field services for the department agreed that Caulfied's effectiveness as a supervisor had been compromised, and discussed transferring him. A transfer order was issued in June, 2007, but was quickly rescinded, and Caulfield was placed on medical leave until September 14, 2007, when he returned to the D-14 station. In February, 2008, he was transferred due to what the city said were ongoing concerns about his supervisory authority. The union then filed a grievance on his behalf.

Neighborhoods: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Union Hacks....
" Caulfield and another sergeant were involved in a physical fight in the duty supervisor room"

In the real world both would have been escorted out. Im going to punch mu buddy two doors down, i wonder what HR will think.

up
Voting closed 0

Am I missing something but isn't throwing a punch at another office (or anyone) grounds for flat out dismissal? I don't want cops who can't keep their cool even around other cops.

My shop is mixed union / non-union but I'm pretty sure if any of us threw a punch at anyone else we'd be shown the door. And we're in a no position of authority and don't carry weapons.

I'm generally pro-union but it's hard when you hear things like this. At least the court ruled sensibly.

up
Voting closed 0

He was "tranferred"- oh, horrors! Anybody out there ever got in a fistfight at work and kept your job? I'm sure the SJC will never allow a commissioner to actually fire cops for brutality, killing unarmed suspects, testilying, drug use, getting in fistfights at work, or any other blatant misconduct. Because allowing that might actually serve some public good beyond the useless squabbles over nickels and dimes (or geographical assignment) that make up city union negotiations and police management. The question of the dismissal or other significant discipline of officers for serious infractions will still be left firmly in the hands of deranged arbitrators.
Thanks for nothing, SJC!

up
Voting closed 0