Hey, there! Log in / Register

Judge tosses Boston's suit against Everett casino

The Globe reports a Suffolk Superior Court judge rejected the city's "spurious" claims and that the city, which has already spent some $1 million on the suit, is looking at a possible appeal.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Attorney Thomas Frongillo has hit the jackpot and the casino isn't even open yet. Who is vetting these outside legal contracts for the City - Lucy Riccardo?

up
Voting closed 0

Yes, both.

Judge Janet L. Sanders ruled

  • "the state Gaming Commission had acted properly in issuing a casino license to Wynn Resorts."
  • "the casino commission did not violate either the Gaming Act or its regulations" and
  • "the entire complaint must be dismissed.”

I don't know if the City of Boston's arguments had any merit. I hope so, they cost us $1,000,000.

"In her ruling, Sanders wrote that Boston failed in all 10 counts contained in its 150-page complaint alleging wrongdoing by the gambling commission."

0 for 10. We paid $1,000,000 to go 0 for 10.

That's $100,000 per failed count of alleged wrongdoing.

Did we actually accuse the gambling commission of wrongdoing? Yes, 10 times.

Judge Janet Sanders "chided Boston and its lawyers for “inflammatory descriptions,” “spurious” claims and “hyperbole” that “tend only to obscure the factual allegations.”

Ouch. That does not sounds like there are adults in the room making reasonable arguments.

"The city alleges a litany of violations and costly damages to Boston, Judge Janet Sanders wrote, affecting traffic, the environment, and public safety." She could not “see how these alleged irregularities impacted Boston much less caused it to suffer any injury sufficient to give it standing.”

Uh oh. No actual damages to Boston, no standing.

"Should Walsh and Wynn come together, they would likely need to resolve the city’s concerns about the traffic the casino is expected to generate in Sullivan Square in Charlestown. Walsh’s deal with Mohegan Sun for the Revere casino would have handed the City of Boston a one-time payment of $30 million plus $18 million annually. Wynn had offered Boston a one-time payment of $6 million and $2.6 million a year, which Walsh rejected.

During the Walsh admin, we've cut $108 million from BPS' budget. We could have used the $1,000,000 we've wated on this lawsuit.

In addition, BPS transfers $121,000,000 a year to charter schools, and Walsh is looking to increase that by "expanding" charters" and "consolidating" BPS schools.

What do you think think?

  • Is Walsh using the courts to gamble for a "better deal" with an Everett casino which owes the City of Boston very little by law?
  • Does the Mayor's method of operation in the Wynn Everett casino case make you think twice about the intent of the person in his office who called the Omni Parker House to "let them know" Teamsters were coming their way?
up
Voting closed 0

1) That $121000 transferred to charter schools pays to educate city residents, most from disadvantaged neighborhoods. 120k is a very, very small fraction of $200m so let's not claim that's the reason for the budget issues.
2) Do you realize the BPS budget went up $200m in the past 5 years to educate 1000 fewer kids? It's currently at $1.013B.

I know there are local funding challenges at the school level, but the overall BPS budget is enormous.

Data:

FY2015- http://bostonpublicschools.org/Page/4281

"The figure is approximately $37 million higher than FY14, thanks to Mayor Martin J. Walsh’s decision to increase the city appropriation to schools by nearly four percent when other city departments are facing reductions."

FY2016 - http://bostonpublicschools.org/Page/692

"The FY’16 budget is notable on several fronts: Mayor Martin J. Walsh has again demonstrated his clear commitment to public education in Boston, aiming to increase the city’s allocations to the district between 3-4%."

Actual figures here - https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/MPncVCxhxNqKE_y39kWiceQlB3kdo7jSUSqo3E...

So in summary, the budget went up $38m, not down by $100m.

up
Voting closed 0

I should have been more specific. During Walsh's two budget cycles, BPS cut $108 million from expenses net of Walsh's 3-4% increase.

And the $129 million that comes out of BPS for charter students annually is before Baker added approx 678 new seats without a hearing.

up
Voting closed 0

If the budget is up 4%, then the total budget is up 4%. So BPS has more money in 2016 than 2015? What do you mean by expenses? We have to pay for everything in the school budget from payroll to facilities to transportation, so if one part is sucking up more money, that's not a budget cut. Again, there might be school level funding problems but it's not a BPS funding issue.

Does the charter school money come out of the $1.1B already allocated to the BPS? Or is it on top of it? I don't see it specifically broken out in this BPS document -

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/oI52pmh8rOTBIH_yqTtfnimWvIX_Dynu6Ii4QI...

up
Voting closed 0

$100 million in cuts last year. $42 million more in cuts this year plus two schools closed.

bostonglobe

Boston schools brace for more cuts
Revenue shrinks amid plans for new initiatives
January 03, 2015

Last year, Walsh supported an approximately 4 percent increase in spending, pushing the overall school budget to about $975 million. The city’s contribution to the school budget represents the lion’s share of revenue.

Even then, the school system still had to cut $100 million in spending to compensate for rising costs and new initiatives.

This year's budget closed two schools and required $42 million more in cuts, much of which was pushed down to principles to cut from their programs.

the Parent Council at Curley K-8 School in Jamaica Plain took to YouTube and posted an 11-minute video explaining how the budget process works in hopes of inspiring more parents to get involved.

“We live in one of the richest cities in the country, but we can’t get our act together to fully fund the education of our kids,” Heshan Berents-Weeramuni, the parent co-chair of the Curley’s School Site Council, said in an interview. “It seems like parents are the only ones advocating for our kids because we know the extent of the cuts.

“Strong schools probably are the greatest asset to every neighborhood. I don’t understand why that is not front and center,” Berents-Weeramuni said.

It remains unclear which schools could suffer the biggest hits. Budget allocations are made on a per-student basis. More information will be known later this month when principals consult parents on developing their individual school budgets.

up
Voting closed 0

Is a 10% cut?

I'm no math expert, but inflation has been running under 4%, and Stevil would point out the decreasing attendance, so the only want this makes sense to be is if you are using those numbers used in theoretical physics.

up
Voting closed 0

$1 million in legal fees down the tubes on a frivolous lawsuit. Thanks a lot Marty.

BTW, his office announced they negotiated a $50,000 cap with lawyers investigating Walsh's office's involvement in the teamsters extortion case.

up
Voting closed 0

This one has 1 other comment. Really, no one's going to go on a tiff about casinos or how this is going to destroy Charlestown?

up
Voting closed 0

$1m wasted on this casino fight.
$500-$1M? and lots of employee time wasted on Boston 2024.
Lots of tax rebates to come to encourage construction

up
Voting closed 0

If you look at the popularity of the mayor who started that, you might want to get comfortable with Walsh. You've got another 18 years to look forward to.

As for these legal fees yes, the odds were against, but it would have been about 4% of the difference between what the Suffolk Downs bid was (or maybe will, pending their suit, which has slightly more standing) going to give and what Wynn will give Boston up front.

up
Voting closed 0

Walsh blew this a long time ago when
he sat on the sidelines during the
vote in East Boston Refused to take
a position then it blew up in his
face, casino moves up the street,
and Boston loses millions going
forward. Then he try's to shake
down Wynn!

up
Voting closed 0

The Eastie vote was when Menino was still in office. I absolutely remember it because he said he wanted it and then he only let the one neighborhood vote on it, which guaranteed it got shot down. So yes, Walsh was very much on the sidelines for that.

up
Voting closed 0

He cut a deal with the Suffolk Downs (now Revere only) then refused to even talk to Wynn's people. He keeps trying to sandbag the Everett project in hopes the license will go to Revere.

up
Voting closed 0

Menino did many good things for the City, but not everything he did should be emulated by this current doorknob we have as a mayor.

up
Voting closed 0

However, my point is that Joe Voter hasn't really cared about these giveaways in the past, so they won't in the future.

Of course, the argument could be made that Menino was also following precedent going back to the Collins era. That's a lot of elections where the incumbent won.

up
Voting closed 0

No one said anything like that. Reading is fundamental.

up
Voting closed 0

Transportation experts say the Wynn casino introduces significant transportation infrastructure problems but the lawsuit failed to prove damages or collect awards sufficient to fund transportation.

Is it time for Walsh to get new lawyers?

Should he ask for the $1,000,000 back?

up
Voting closed 0