Trump-free zone established in Jamaica Plain

There's no requirement for citizens to support him willingly. You can call him the president, but you can't call him my president. If you don't understand the difference, that's your problem to solve, not mine.

I don't recall any other time in history that congress' entire goal was to block absolutely everything the president did, regardless of whether it was something they once agreed upon. Perhaps I should read up once again.

You know, like they used to be okay with Garland until Obama submitted his name for nomination.

klaatu barada nikto

President Obama and I were born around the same time, he in 1961, me in 1966. Back then babies didn't typically get SSNs; you got an SSN when you first needed one, typically when you were looking for your first job. If you moved between birth and when you got your SSN, of course your place of birth and your SSN wouldn't match.

I got my SSN when I was 12 or 13, when I earned enough interest income to have to pay taxes on it.

Issuance at birth became mandatory with the 1987 income tax reforms, when taxpayers started having to list their dependent children by SSN. (Listing nonexistent children had been, so the story went, a popular form of tax fraud among the middle class.)

A police officer, which you aren't, you would be in dire need of retraining.

Social security numbers were not assigned at birth for old geezers like me and Obama. They were assigned by the field office in the state where the individual applied, usually when the individual first started working above the table (for me, at age 15).

My social number matches neither the state of my birth nor the state of my residence. And it's not on my drivers license either. Millions of other Americans share these facts with me.

So your made-up hypothetical boast just exposes how little you know both about social security numbers and about policing. Real police officers don't prioritize their work based on conspiracy theories from the fever swamps of the Internet.

You have a well established record of making deceptive and untrue statements in your postings. The challenge to exposing you is that without your identity, you know it that disproving your assertions is elusive. But with all liars, impeded in their lies are small statements they make that open the door to unraveling their bullshit stories.

True to form, you have not disappointed. You stated: "my passport is good til 2023. I may use it for inaugural, even though it's a domestic flight, I still want the D.C. stamp from Reagan airport."

Fishy, you assumed that your "readers" are stupid and you simply said something without any idea if it comports to reality. Let's start here.

If and when your passport, is stamped, that action would take place upon entry into the US, It would occur because you are not a US Citizen. This would happen as you pass through US Customs. If fact, most passports of individuals entering the US are no longer stamped. Instead, the visitor is issued a receipt which is stamped at the onset of the customs process then retrieved at the end of the customs process.

In any case, flying from one US city to another US city would never require you to pass through customs. The idea that you would get a stamp from Reagan Airport is even more preposterous. Stamps are "Port of Entry" specific. Not airport specific.

Now I anticipate you are going to attempt to offer some sort of andedotal argument that you have had your passport stamped…unless you are prepared to prove it, lets just agree that you are full of shit and just a garden variety liar (and not a particularly good one at that).

Now the real implication of this example of your latest deceit is that if you are motived to lie about something so easily disproven, it is reasonable to assume that you lie about other things. We'll get to that later.

BikeGeek & Sock Puppet & Swirly are all correct. This even goes later into the 1970s, maybe into the early 80s.

My sister was born in 1973 and I was born in 1976 in Connecticut. However, our SSN's were not issued until 1985 because we didn't need it. Hers and mine are ONE digit off from each other (literally). But since by 1985 we lived in New Hampshire, my SSN reflects a NH number, not a Connecticut number. My father sent off the hospital-issued county raised seal copy to the SS Administration and got us cards without much of an issue. But then again, it was 1985 and state issued birth certificates were not required at the time.

To further prove that I was right.. in 1997, I lost all forms of ID due to a psychopath roommate who burned them all on the stove one day while I was at work (long fucked up story that contains sex, drugs,and rock n roll). This was including a raised seal copy of a birth certificate issued by the hospital in 1976.

My father sent me the hospital-issued county raised seal copy he had (we had two copies), but when I went to re-apply for a replacement SSN card, they would not take it. I was told by the Social Security Administration that I needed a State Issued birth certificate, and it had to be the full copy... identical to Obama's... and not the wallet card I ordered also with the full certificate from the State of Connecticut.

Which btw.. if you ever lose ALL YOUR ID.. it is a royal pain the in ass to prove that you are you. I had to have several letters from employers, friends, and what not notarized proving who I said I was, along with a signed affidavit. This whole process took MONTHS and had to be done in sequence. Birth Certificate First, then SSN, then Drivers License...

Of course this whole process took months... mean while, a few weeks after I started this process, I was pulled over in Kennesaw Georgia. (Yes hillybilly GA). I had no drivers license, except a valid one in NH which I had no actual ID for. I rattled off my SSN and the cop was able to pull up my NH license to see it was valid. My car was impounded and I had to pay a hefty fine (which I was able to get waived as my ID finally arrived so I could covert my valid NH to a GA license).

The cop NEVER once suspected me because my SSN was different than the state I was born in. Frankly the cop wouldn't have known anyways, since my SSN was issued from the state I had a drivers license in. Honestly I don't think the cop would have even known or cared what the prefix meant, as they only wanted the SSN to cross reference an existing drivers license. Nothing more, nothing less.

My point.. you're full of shit and have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. And frankly are just talking out your ass. And if I didn't care so much about my privacy on here (to a degree), just to prove you wrong, I'd be more than happy to scan and upload EVERTHING I have surrounding this story because I saved all correspondence. (even though this was 1997, before the days of electronic filing online.. I had to use snail mail for everything). I really can prove you're full of shit on this one.

So stop talking conservative talking points. He's less than 30 days away from being out of office. Let it go.

You really have zero clue.

BTW, Reagan airport does not have customs for commercial flights, even if they did stamp passports for domestic travel.

Born in MA, I have a social security number that corresponds with a MA birth. Still unsure how Obama, born in Hawaii, received a social security number for a person born in Connecticut.

Back then, there was no such thing as "A social security number for a person born in Connecticut." Social security numbers corresponded to where the card was issued, not where the account holder was born.

I was born in Massachusetts. My social security number was issued in a different state, because that's where my grandparents lived, and they set up a bank account for me into which they deposited a gift on the occasion of my turning three or something, and that transaction needed a social security number.

(and, for whatever it's worth, this was not some trust fund thing, grandpa was a retired railway worker and it was a couple of hundred bucks.)

Would you care to comment on the dozens of inaccuracies pointed out at your above post, or are you going to continue to spout ignorance and rumor?

Also, since this seems to be such a hot issue with you, you must have directed a lot of outrage at Rafael Eduardo Cruz when he announced his run for POTUS since he shares identical birth characteristics as Obama, and I heard that someone witnessed him being born in Mexico, also I haven't seen his Birth Cert (long form) so I can't really be sure that he isn't an ILLEGAL MEXICAN STEALING MY JOBS AND/OR TAXPAYER DOLLARS.