Boston asshole tries to find the humor in mass death

Leavitt thinks it's funny people died in Manchester UK

Even if he had no shred of decency, which appears to be the case, you'd think somebody from Boston would know better than to make jokes about people dying in an explosion hours after it happened.

Neighborhoods: 

Topics: 

Comments

Poor attempt at humor by

By on

Poor attempt at humor by David Leavitt, but what comes of false outrage and internet shaming?

up
Voting is closed. 3

Who says it's false?

By on

I really am outraged by this putz. As for Internet shaming, well, obviously I think he richly deserves some.

up
Voting is closed. 3

Me thinks so too. His timing

By on

Me thinks so too. His timing is poor and the joke itself is terrible. I really don't get what inspires these morons to say jokes after a tragedy. The last person who did it right was Joan Rivers and even then, Gilbert Gottfried had to save her ala' the Aristocrats. Someone should contact his employers!

up
Voting is closed. 2

I get it, he is an idiot, but

By on

I get it, he is an idiot, but what comes of it? Your blood pressure goes up for a few hours and in two weeks, no one cares or remembers? They will be too busy remembering 19 dead people. Focus on what is important.

up
Voting is closed. 2

The local angle

By on

Guy used to write for Channel 4 (he did some "best of" guides for them) and is from Boston. So, no, I wouldn't have posted anything if he were from some other place.

up
Voting is closed. 3

But it's so much fun to join

By on

But it's so much fun to join the social network pitchfork mob, isn't it?

up
Voting is closed. 3

I'd ask him to give it a rest.

If I was standing next to him in a bar, I'd ask him to give it a rest.

I watched many people ask him to give it a rest. He would not. He's kind of a dick. He was trying to be funny I assume. He was being cruel.

up
Voting is closed. 4

I thought the same thing until

By on

I looked at his profile. He's some type of journalist and advertises himself as such while commenting online. I think that makes him fair game.

up
Voting is closed. 3

what comes of [actual]

what comes of [actual] outrage and internet shaming?

Gets his name out there into Google search results for the next time he's job-hunting. You're welcome.

up
Voting is closed. 6

Frank99 thinks the public is

By on

Frank99 thinks the public is 'faux' outraged by a journalist joking about children being blown to bits at a pop concert... I'm glad I don't know you.

RIP to the victims.

up
Voting is closed. 4

Freedom of speech, anyone? If

By on

Freedom of speech, anyone? If you don't like it, don't retweet him or follow him.

up
Voting is closed. 3

Jailing him would interfere with that

By on

Making sure that potential employers see this, as he is a broadcast personality, is also free speech.

Actions ... meet consequences!

up
Voting is closed. 3

DailyMail just posted about

By on

DailyMail just posted about him. "You had to be a big shot, big shot, why'd ya open up your mouthhh" Now the world knows how employable you are! Asshole.

up
Voting is closed. 3

You might want to look into what done in poor taste means.

By on

Considering people (and many children) were blown up at the concert.

And it really has nothing to do with freedom of speech. (oh, BTW, there are limits on that also. Ya know, defamation of character, that sort of thing that folks go to court over?)

up
Voting is closed. 2

congrats

in your self righteous effort to be a bastion of all that is good & saintly you just rephrased what the guy you were responding to said

up
Voting is closed. 3

Exactly

Adam is exercising his free speech.

up
Voting is closed. 4

FREEZE PEACH!!

By on

Yes, he isn't the only asshole with free speech. All of the people who are telling him that what he said is stupid are ALSO exercising their free speech. Just because he said something does not mean that no one will challenge what he said or tell their friends that he said something stupid. Free speech isn't freedom from consequences, it's freedom from government censorship. I see no evidence that anyone is trying to censor him. Quite the opposite actually, his words are being spread far and wide with the amount of derision they deserve.

up
Voting is closed. 2

"Freedom of speech" has nothing to do with it

By on

Reread Article 1 -- "freedom of speech" refers to government regulation of speech, not the use of Facebook by schmucks or decent people calling the schmuck out.

up
Voting is closed. 3

Um, bro, free speech is

By on

Um, bro, free speech is exactly all of what you posted. Including your post!

up
Voting is closed. 2

Hey now

By on

Plenty of people game, be it videogames, board games, or newly ARG'ing such as escape rooms.

Don't lump this maladjusted dick in with us.

up
Voting is closed. 3

Leavitt

By on

Lived with this guy in college. He was nice enough, but an emotional mess whenever he'd drink. His comments are dumb and insensitive, but he's ultimately harmless. He's always been the type of guy to say/do the wrong thing at the wrong time. I'm sure he's feeling the backlash today.

up
Voting is closed. 3

Needs an intervention

Dude needs a crash course in decency. Laughing about somebody else's murdered children before the bodies are even cold. David Leavitt is a shithead.

up
Voting is closed. 3

He deleted the tweet.

By on

Rookie mistake. Never delete the tweet. That just makes it worse.

up
Voting is closed. 5

Too soon- not just a

By on

Too soon- not just a punchline afterall

up
Voting is closed. 2

Whew

Thought this was gonna be about me

up
Voting is closed. 5

Lots of outrage over this

By on

Lots of outrage over this buffoon's lack of judgement here. Rightly so I might add. My question is this, is anyone outraged by yet another terrorist attack? This time this was directly aimed at young adults and children. I find this more troubling than an idiots tweet.

up
Voting is closed. 3

Yes, of course

By on

Don't infer any lack of concern over the murder of innocent children from a discussion on a Boston Web site about a Boston person.

up
Voting is closed. 3

i'm not really outraged

if i'm being honest

about the tweet nor the bombings. suicide bombings happen globally almost as often as shitty tweets

thats life now

up
Voting is closed. 2

Whatever this guy's reasons are for making jokes about this

By on

horrible explosion that killed a whole bunch of people, the jokes and humor over the Manchester explosion and the resulting deaths are inexcusable, and not funny, at all, especially for the grieving survivors of those who perished in that explosion. This guy has to learn some common sense, which he seems to be woefully short on.

up
Voting is closed. 4

Just not funny

By on

I've made black comedy jokes before. But they have to be funny. This guy's just not good at comedy.

up
Voting is closed. 3

Making jokes about this kind of catastrophe:

By on

Making jokes about a horrible explosion that maims and/or kills tons of people is totally out of line. Even black comedy humor isn't appropriate for something like this.

up
Voting is closed. 5

?

congrats you literally don't know what "black comedy humor" is

i will say that i privately made my own jokes to an audience i knew would take them for what they were. somebody showed me a video of the concert hall (you saw no explosions/bodies or anything of that nature) and i heard the big pop and then of course the confusion that followed. it pretty effectively made me lose interest in making jokes about it, but if somebody else can be funny with it i encourage them to go wild.

up
Voting is closed. 4

Kaz and scumquistador:

By on

My whole point is this: The horrific suicide bomber attack at England's Manchester Arena that killed at least 29 people is not a joking matter....period. Why make jokes about it at all?

up
Voting is closed. 3

no, your point, even though you dont know what it is

is that you don't find black comedy to be funny. that is a perfectly acceptable, reasonable, and not uncommon view to have.

unfortunately for you, your opinion does little to change the long standing existence of such humor.

as far as "why"? seriously go look it up yourself if you honestly don't understand why people joke about grizzly affairs. i'm not going to explain this shit to you.

heres an example of some black humor i saw in the wild once, in cincinatti. there was a homeless guy in a wheelchair missing either one or both (i forget, it's been 10 years) legs. he had a sign that said something to the effect of "give me money or i'll kick your ass" this is an example of black humor. it doesn't even always have to be directed at others, it can be self deprecating too! and if you find less humor in a mans misfortune than said man does, well, perhaps you need to start looking at the constant in all of this.

up
Voting is closed. 2

yeah

you're actually missing your own point which is pretty incredible

up
Voting is closed. 4

Yes, it's exactly when it's appropriate

By on

Here, let the country where this occurred tell you exactly why it may not be your cup of tea, but it's good for our psyche to hear black comedy:

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-12775389

Any fan of Peter Cook or Bill Hicks will attest that dark humour predated the internet, however, and none other than Sigmund Freud addressed the topic in his 1927 essay Humour (Der Humor).
In it, the father of psychoanalysis argued that sick jokes were the mechanism by which the ego "insists that it cannot be affected by the traumas of the external world".
His analysis is shared by Dr Oliver Double, an expert in comedy at the University of Kent who believes that tackling offensive subjects can be a very effective tool of satire as well as a form of therapy.
For instance, Dr Double was in the audience for Connolly's Ken Bigley routine and argues it was a carefully-argued attack on media prurience rather than the opportunistic swipe at a family's tragedy it was portrayed as in the press.

The problem here is that this guy's attempt wasn't a good one. It relies too heavily on making fun of the victims. It begins with a news headline about the dead rather than an assumption that you already know that there are victims of the bombing. It's just poorly constructed.

Maybe a better black comedy joke would have been: I hear that the bomber waited until the end of the concert because the ticket was so expensive he couldn't let it go to waste.

up
Voting is closed. 8

Whoa!

By on

This:

I hear that the bomber waited until the end of the concert because the ticket was so expensive he couldn't let it go to waste.

doesn't sound like a good joke in response to this horrible tragedy, either.

up
Voting is closed. 4

in all honesty

the best joke that can be made on uhub about this already has been made, but its more in the performance art category. a bunch of self righteous twats a few timezones away expressing their rage that some guy wasn't funny enough mocking a concert bombing

now that is genuinely hilarious

also. roger moore just died. britain having is having a bad day

up
Voting is closed. 3

Interesting juxtaposition

By on

The death of a Bond and a suicide bombing.

Bond always won because he only had to defeat one or two evil geniuses to bring an entire villainous enterprise to shambles. Bond would be no match for today's villains. They are largely anonymous, require no structured hierarchy of evil, and rely on no genius plans. Anyone anywhere can form an attack with some construction materials. All the laser pens and missile-launching Aston Martins can't stop a backpack from exploding in a crowded place.

Our enemies today aren't evil geniuses. They're just otherwise normal people put upon by inequality and inequity, constant asymmetric warfare, and tribalism.

up
Voting is closed. 2

I don't think that's it

By on

a bunch of self righteous twats a few timezones away expressing their rage that some guy wasn't funny enough mocking a concert bombing

Do you honestly think that their criticism is that he wasn't funny enough? I don't. They're not arguing about where he is on the spectrum of less funny/more funny; they're arguing that this is not a "funny" think in any degree, and that no amount of skill would have changed that.

I understand what you're saying about black humor, but I also think you're missing some of the essence of black humor, too. There is a matter of timing; it's why people say "too soon". And before you ask for some definitive statement on how long is long enough, the fact that such a thing can't be precisely defined doesn't mean that "too soon" doesn't exist.

up
Voting is closed. 3

Ah...I see the issue

By on

scumq. is right. You don't grasp the point. It's cool, not all comedy is for everyone.

up
Voting is closed. 4

Like I said before, Joan

By on

Like I said before, Joan Rivers made a joke about 9/11 firefighters widows a week or two after the tragedy. Was it black comedy? Yes. Did it spur Up controversy? Yes. But you're just a commenter on the internet trying too hard.

up
Voting is closed. 2

A better joke would be

By on

Fear for my own life....Now I have another reason not to go to Boston Calling this weekend.

up
Voting is closed. 2

Audience matters

By on

Black comedy is funny if you know that your audience will receive it in the proper spirit and frame of mind.

You don't serve caviar and well-aged scotch to kids in the elementary school cafeteria.

up
Voting is closed. 5

Indeed

By on

This is why I have a custom Facebook list just for offensive jokes. My friends have to request to be added. Know your audience.

(I didn't post any jokes about this. But I still remember thinking after 9/11, "This will never be funny," and then The Onion releasing a special 9/11 themed issue right after.)

up
Voting is closed. 2

Impulse control, Mr. Leavitt

By on

I like dark humor. Psychologically, it serves an important purpose for humans. Just sometimes, you gotta say no, I'm not gonna crack this joke. Would you crack a joke about boy from Dorchester killed by the marathon bomb?

up
Voting is closed. 1

Could be worse

By on

Another twit has posted a couple of times about how this is God's retribution against Ariana Grande for assorted imagined faults. No, I'm not going to provide links because attention is exactly what this religious nut-job wants (despite all her faux-protestations about persecution). Leavitt's post was in extremely poor taste, but at least he isn't engaging in fanatical emotional terrorism.

up
Voting is closed. 3

I don't visit this site for personal shaming

By on

I visit this site for news in Boston that the Globe and other new sources may not cover, and I appreciate it for that. I'm not really interested in reading about particular people who do something boneheaded like posting an offensive tweet or putting a Confederate flag on the porch and calling them out for it. It seems to take away from the journalist integrity of this site. I know I don't have to read it, etc. But figure I throw my opinion that you stop this as it seems beneath the mission of Universal Hub.

up
Voting is closed. 3

"beneath the mission"

By on

Well, what IS this lofty mission, then? Posting about turkeys over and over as if, wow, it's the first time anyone's ever seen one?

We've all got things that we come to uhub for, and I'm sure we all have things we think are incredibly stupid. When the latter outweighs the former, that's when you move on to a new site.

up
Voting is closed. 3

I come here explicitly for

By on

I come here explicitly for all of those things, so I have nullified your vote. You're welcome. :)

up
Voting is closed. 2

People are strange...

... and sometimes they process inconceivable horror in ways that seem bizarrely inappropriate.

Until I see evidence to the contrary, I'm willing to accept that he's not actually a vile scumbag trying to milk this for a cheap laugh.

up
Voting is closed. 2