Hey, there! Log in / Register

State's highest court blasts Charlestown court for sitting on possible assault-and-battery case for nearly three years

The Supreme Judicial Court ruled today that if a Boston Police officer wants to pursue a potential assault-and-battery charge against her district commander, she needs to first file an appeal in the court where a clerk-magistrate found no probable cause for the charge.

In its ruling, which rejected the unnamed officer's request that it take up the matter, the court noted the case's tortuous path through the court system - the officer first filed it in West Roxbury Municipal Court, but it was transferred to Charlestown and ultimately to Dedham District Court as both she and her supervisor sought to have the case moved out of West Roxbury and then all of Boston due to potential conflict-of-interest issues.

The justices issued a stern rebuke to the Charlestown court:

The nearly three-year delay in the Charlestown Division of the Boston Municipal Court Department is unacceptable. There is no excuse for this period of delay in any case scheduled for a clerk-magistrate's hearing. See G. L. c. 218, § 35A. The delay in this case is particularly troubling. The parties and the community are not just entitled to a fair and just adjudication of this matter. The perception of justice must also be scrupulously protected. Here, it was not. As a result, no matter how just the result in this case may be, to the petitioner and perhaps others, justice is tainted by the delay.

Neighborhoods: 
Free tagging: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complete SJC decision16.88 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

There's no enforceable penalty in the MGLs for courts and the authorities having jurisdiction for exceeding time limits (MGLs sometimes list #s of days but no penalties) or rendering judgement or action in matters where time is of the essence. So why would any court or AHJ bother to not drag their feet or ignore the tasks at hand when there's no repercussions?

The only remedy available is to appeal to the courts, and when the issue is the courts, appeal to the SJC, which in this case and others writes a stern letter but still fails to provide an enforceable penalty as motivation for action.

Citizens shouldn't be dependent on needing to beg judges to enforce or administer laws because other judges or state administrators refuse to comply with duties they are charged with in a timely fashion if at all.

up
Voting closed 0