Roofless in Allston after classic storrowing

Karyn Regal at WBZ News Radio photographed a box truck that became a bit lighter this morning after its driver disregarded those "CARS ONLY" signs in Allston.

Neighborhoods: 

Topics: 

Free tagging: 

Ad:

Comments

Ah, yes, every time!

By on

"I'm sorry officer, the speed limit sign was not a Picasso, so I wasn't obeying the speed limit."

But, really, doesn't it get old after a while?

Also, before you get to the non-MUTCD-compliant sign there are no fewer than five (5) "No trucks" signs. If those regulation signs don't get the message across, maybe the DANGER NO TRUCKS flashing lights thing will.

Or maybe paying attention in fourth grade would help. Reading comprehension is a thing!

up
Voting is closed. 59

What gets old after awhile is automatically

By on

blaming the driver for poorly designed "custom" signs, poorly sized and placed standard sized signs, and signs that don't operate as intended.

The clearance and vehicle restrictions should be UNMISTAKABLY and CLEARLY communicated to the drivers BEFORE they even have a chance to enter these toadways, and not as an afterthought once they've already committed to the entrance ramp. It's a simple concept.

up
Voting is closed. 35

When you have a professional truck driver's license

By on

it is your responsibility to know how high your truck is and where it can go on your intended route. People try to save money or time by taking alternate routes but the fault is with them if their truck can't fit - because it's their JOB.

up
Voting is closed. 54

Yes, but...

By on

Many (not all) of the Storrowings are moving trucks , ie Ryder, U-Haul - you do not need a “professional truck driver’s” license for one of these.

I was able to drive a 28 foot box truck, legally, with zero training.

I doubt any of the storrowings are from crafty truck drivers that are trying to save time and money. I would bet it is mostly people who are either unfamiliar with the area or unfamiliar with their truck - probably both.

up
Voting is closed. 24

Yes

By on

but you are missing the point that you don’t need to be well qualified to drive a truck like this - hence enhanced signage / indicators may help prevent Future Storrowings.

up
Voting is closed. 14

All I'm saying is

By on

If perhaps they put a sign up noting the height limit ahead and maybe a few signs noting that trucks were not allowed, maybe.. oh wait, that's in the photo? Nevermind.

up
Voting is closed. 49

A matter of numbers comprehension

By on

Maybe the driver failed math and arithmetic in fourth grade, not understanding that a 12'-6" truck height is greater than a 11'-0" clearance, especially since the large 12'6" is pasted on the truck as shown in one of the photos in the tweet.

If you can't count from 1 to 13 and don't know that 12 > 11, then you shouldn't have a driver's license.

up
Voting is closed. 20

Unlikely

By on

Since he would have had to get under River and Western (both 10') and the bridge he hit (Grand Junction, I assume) is 11.

up
Voting is closed. 18

So... if you personally don't

By on

So... if you personally don't approve of the design of a sign, you will then choose to drive recklessly? How odd.

up
Voting is closed. 28

Every time

By on

IMAGE(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/001/881/be9.jpg)

up
Voting is closed. 32

Hmmm.

If I was facing a sign that looked like it was
made by a fourth grader, I'd probably disregard it too.

Aw, jeez, with that attitude Bennett is never gonna get to be sheriff.

up
Voting is closed. 11

At Last

By on

I am a Roving U Hub Photographer!

up
Voting is closed. 63