Abandoned house turned abandoned realty office and empty bank branch.
A Canton builder has purchased two abandoned buildings on Centre Street, at Park Street, in West Roxbury, both of which it wants to bulldoze.
The developer, CAD Builders LLC, won zoning-board approval approval in June, extend West Roxbury's bird neighborhood with 29 single-family homes, some clustered around a new street called Toucan Road,
CAD Builders has yet to signal just what it will do with the two Centre Street parcels, now home to the old Gilmore place and the neighboring post-apocalyptic former banking bunker at the corner of Park Street. However, it's filed requests with the Boston Landmarks Commission to demolish both buildings - a required step with any building more than 50 years old. People who might object to the demolitions have until Jan. 10 to tell the commission why or forever hold their peace.
In September, CAD Builders paid $1.1 million to buy the old Gilmore place from a Norwood concern that in turn had bought it a few months earlier for $915,000 from Roslindale landlord Vinny Marino, who had earlier acquired it from the Gilmores, according to Suffolk County Registry of Deeds records. A month later, CAD Builders paid $1.3 million for the former bank branch from Rockland Trust, which shut it after it acquired Blue Hills Bank, which had a much larger branch across the street.
The two parcels in total make up about a third of an acre, or 14,658 square feet. By way of comparison, another developer put 16 condos and commercial space in a four-story building at Centre and Willow streets, across from Roche Bros.
The old Peoples Federal Savings branch turned Rockland Trust branch:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
While I'd hate to see...
By Don't Panic
Thu, 12/26/2019 - 11:16pm
an old classic like the Gilmore place demolished; I can see the logic of replacing it with 29 single family homes. Sometimes you have to let go of the past to support the future.
that single fam has been
By anon
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 8:24am
that single fam has been looking ROUGH in the past few years - even if they wanted to rehab it, it's kind of questionable how much is recoverable from the original materials - and if you're stripping it to the studs anyway, it's not really saving the original, is it?
Maybe the story isn't clear
By Gary C
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 8:33am
The 29 houses are going in a different development. The developer hasn't signaled what they plan to do with this. Some kind of housing with retail on the ground floor seems to make the most sense. (That or a parking lot, but CAD didn't pay $2 million to put in free parking.)
Oh c'mon
By capecoddah
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 1:47am
Don't knock brutalist structures. Your beloved Trotskyites displayed great individual expression in their many, and *awesome*, contributions.
Is the cognitive dissonance too much for you? Don't worry. Lenin felt the same way as you about brutalism.
Huh?
By Jethro
Sun, 12/29/2019 - 10:54am
"Lenin felt the same way as you about brutalism."
I don't think Lenin had very strong feelings about brutalism, given he died about 25 years before the movement got started.
Fair enough... but...
By capecoddah
Sun, 12/29/2019 - 11:40am
I did play fast and loose with terms, yes.
Lenin had to deal with the futurists in his time. 40 years before brutalism was a coined term, the artists and architects who ushered in brutalist style were avant garde futurists
Read this:
https://musings-on-art.org/100-years-of-russian-ar...
Cue the usual West Roxbury
By Nahmy
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 12:07am
Cue the usual West Roxbury NIMBYs complaining about any and all progress anywhere in their “town.”
Oh it's already happening
By Gary C
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 10:18am
Every post on Facebook starts out with, "No more condos!"
Wow the
By anon
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 12:04pm
Horror, people being involved with their neighborhood and it’s future.
That’s not it. Try again.
By Nahmy
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 1:52pm
That’s not it. Try again.
Single family homes?
By Stevil
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 6:32am
C'mon already. There is a massive housing shortage. Don't be dense. Build dense. 3-4 stories with commercial on first floor sounds excellent. We can't be wasting large parcels like this. Plus single family zoning is terrible for the environment.
Don't worry
By BostonDog
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 10:13am
He didn't pay $1.1 million for a single family in need of a gut renovation with plans to restore it to it's former glory. This isn't Cambridge.
hopefully those 3-4 stories
By anon
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 8:26am
hopefully those 3-4 stories have actually afordable housing. they're charging 650k for fucking apartment-sized CONDOS in that new building across from starbucks on centre - and of course they're all still on the market despite the building being done for ages now. I'm all for density but there should be a time limit between the building getting done and people moving in, and if the developer takes a hit on his millions of dollars in profit so actual working people can live in these places, so be it
Google “supply and demand”
By Nahmy
Sat, 12/28/2019 - 11:25am
Google “supply and demand”
yeah, they're priced too high
By anon
Mon, 12/30/2019 - 11:33am
yeah, they're priced too high, that's why they're empty. except developers are allowed to write off losses on uninhabited units as income loss and all kinds of other financial trickery so instead of lowering their prices, which is what supply and demand SUGGESTS they do, they can still make money even with the damn things empty, just waiting for a sucker
The building is actually well
By Kris MacDonald
Sat, 01/04/2020 - 9:05pm
The building is actually well over 50% sold (some still pending an upcoming closing) many more which closed recently so their sales prices are now public record.
So true look at all the empty
By anon
Mon, 01/20/2020 - 8:15pm
So true look at all the empty condos on Washington St and still more going up
Where are you getting that from?
By John
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 11:17am
Huh? Nowhere in the article does it state there will be single family homes built on the two lots. It will most likely be ground-floor retail with condos above it, given its location.
Probably my fault
By adamg
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 12:20pm
The company's big West Roxbury project is a subdivision of single-family homes on the other side of the neighborhood, maybe I didn't make it clear that that doesn't mean they plan to build single-family homes on Centre Street (which, as others have noted would be kind of dumb - the lot isn't large enough for more than maybe two houses and there's no way they could recoup their acquisition costs that way).
Cue the WRSA aka chronicles of WR...
By Bill B
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 9:14am
Can’t wait for the geniuses of the West Roxbury Safety Association to pivot their pedestrian safety expertise into building safety and deem any development here unsafe.
You can’t put a building that close to the road! Where will the pedestrians leap for safety when drivers weaving at 40 mph on their four lane highway jump onto the sidewalk?
You already can’t always get a parking space directly in front of the store you’re going to! No more new people! Because of safety! Really, safety. That’s what it’s about.
Big Box
By Carmella
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 3:31pm
Looks like another big box made of Legos will be approved by the ZBA and stand on this site. When will this city develop a plan to keep and bring back families to the city?
Please explain
By Gary C
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 4:37pm
This is a double lot on the edge of a busy commercial street. I welcome your thoughts on how to turn this into housing for families.
Seriously?
By Stevil
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 5:52pm
Have you ever driven around Boston? Huge swaths of the city are filled with commercial on the first floor and 3-4 stories of residential above.
this is the type of housing we should be building almost everywhere. Except downtown where we should be building mid rise 20-50 stories as appropriate (yes, including my neighborhood of Back Bay parkwayne! - though not in the historic district).
Plenty of family housing
By SwirlyGrrl
Sat, 12/28/2019 - 4:29pm
Boston has a glut of 3-4 bedroom homes.
What Boston needs is smaller units for singles and doubles and smaller families - studio, 1, and 2 bedroom units.
That would pull singles out of the larger units, freeing them for families.
But do you really want families? They tend to use more tax money than they supply. That's why "vasectomy" housing is popular for communities on the I-95 circuit around the city - no school kids.
Simple structure with an
By anon
Fri, 12/27/2019 - 4:17pm
Simple structure with an architectural symmetry that is pleasing to the eye. One by one these modest gems are disappearing in the name of LUXURY condo development.
" pleasing to the eye"
By Keiko
Sat, 12/28/2019 - 12:35pm
A nice, warm, charming aesthetic is what Center St is losing - and arguably has lost a lot already. The kind of feel that makes you want to walk from shop to shop, rather than drive to one shop, park in front, do whatever in that shop, and then leave. And if you don't get a spot in front, you drive right past all the shops.
Building fronts that are just blocks directly abutting the cement sidewalk don't create that feel.
Here's hoping that the developer does create something pleasing that encourages people to stay and enjoy, rather then something cold and efficient that encourages people to drive on by.
Add comment